VIDEO: Hearn: I've received confirmation that Wilder has agreed to Brezeale

check this guy out. took what a promoter said as gospel truth and made a thread. lemme tell u, if u ever go back and read some of the dumb s--- people on here believe, its a riot. Look at what he wrote after the video :lol1:

no i didnt :lol1: full of excuses others had warned me about your biases :thinking: unless you can name me some big fights where one fighter got a flat fee Maidana, Maidana, Guerrero, Ortiz, Mosley, Marquez, Berto. There you go. Why are you still yapping? I named all of these fights long ago. :lol1: derp derp yu iz biased doe. ReddFoxx PMd you to dell that littuhl lacedup hates american crackheads :lol1: Pathetic. Boring.

You asked for one big PPV fight no i didnt :lol1: full of excuses others had warned me about your biases

No other way to look at it if he signs for Brezeale without making a counter offer. Seems like Wilder is just looking for his generation’s and descendant’s retirement funds from the Joshua fight.

Lol at the Wilder fan boys, saying Joshua has another opponent lined up too to excuse this possible blatant duck. There's a big difference from possibly having to face your mandatory instead of unifying and actually signing to fight another opponent. Who Joshua fights next is still up for debate but if what is being said is true then Wilder is only fighting one guy next and it won't be Joshua. If Wilder has signed to fight Breazeale which may explain the lack of the counter offer and the general silence from Wilder and his team then this maybe the clearest duck since Lewis/Bowe.

Cotto upside was 35% split Cotto didn’t get 35% :lol1:

if cotto got upside and hatton got uk ppv that means there was no flat fee moron and lookie here declaring yourself a winner of something "whos next" that childish shiiit is laughable. only immature people declare themselves winners to make themselves feel better :dunce: Haha that’s a James Toney quote you dunce :lol1: Maidana, Maidana, Guerrero, Ortiz, Mosley, Marquez, Berto. There you go. You asked for one big PPV fight. Don’t hide behind the Cotto fight. We weren’t discussing if Floyd ever gave a split to anyone, but that seems to be the route you want to go down. I guess because you know you were talking absolute rubbish in regards to “name me one big PPV fight... “ Another fail for bigjavi. How’s Espinoza doing? :lol1:

Cotto upside was 35% split bruh he was just like i won whos next :rofl: thats the shiiit kids do

So come up with proof. You said Cotto, and that wasn't true - He just had an upside not a split. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1173821-mayweather-vs-cotto-purse-breakdown-of-payouts-for-both-fighters Who's the other one? Even Hatton didn't get a split, he just got UK PPV. You can say what you want but you haven't proved anything, what you said wasn't true and you resort to old top rank PPV fights to back it up lol. You asked for one big fight and I gave you about 8, so that should be enough. NEXT WHO'S NEXT I GOT MILK BABY if cotto got upside and hatton got uk ppv that means there was no flat fee moron and lookie here declaring yourself a winner of something "whos next" that childish shiiit is laughable. only immature people declare themselves winners to make themselves feel better :dunce:

Upside: "if we do 1million PPVs you get 2million dollars on top" Split: "You get x% of everything in the pot" Cotto upside was 35% split

What's the difference between upside and split Upside: "if we do 1million PPVs you get 2million dollars on top" Split: "You get x% of everything in the pot"

So come up with proof. You said Cotto, and that wasn't true - He just had an upside not a split. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1173821-mayweather-vs-cotto-purse-breakdown-of-payouts-for-both-fighters Who's the other one? Even Hatton didn't get a split, he just got UK PPV. You can say what you want but you haven't proved anything, what you said wasn't true and you resort to old top rank PPV fights to back it up lol. You asked for one big fight and I gave you about 8, so that should be enough. NEXT WHO'S NEXT I GOT MILK BABY What's the difference between upside and split

so when top rank was the promoter people bought the ppv because it said top rank or because floyd was on the card? you can try one more time if you'd like this is getting boring already you were wrong pacquiao wasn't the only one :dunce: So come up with proof. You said Cotto, and that wasn't true - He just had an upside not a split. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1173821-mayweather-vs-cotto-purse-breakdown-of-payouts-for-both-fighters Who's the other one? Even Hatton didn't get a split, he just got UK PPV. You can say what you want but you haven't proved anything, what you said wasn't true and you resort to old top rank PPV fights to back it up lol. You asked for one big fight and I gave you about 8, so that should be enough. NEXT WHO'S NEXT I GOT MILK BABY

That isnt what is happening here Bolio my man. AJ offered Wilder 12.5mill flat rate based on what they thougt the fight makes and what they think Wilder is worth (bearing in mind it was the first offer in the negotiations so starting low). The 50mill part is Joshua saying "IF the fight is worth 100mill, then i will happily accept a 50/50 split when offered. But its not, so that isnt how much the fight is worth." I seriously and genuinely don't know how anyone can misinterpret what Joshua said here. I thought it was clear what he was trying to put across.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/BogusAllCoyote-max-1mb.gif .. ..

Eddie keep trying to look tough by telling lies to the media. In reality he slowly bending to our demands. He need me. We working on the fight right now. Announcement soon.

So far they have offered a flat fee of 12.5 million for Wilder or a flat fee of 50 million for AJ or more than 4 times as much. That isn't fair and who is African American has nothing to do with it. Those offers amount to about an 80/20 split in AJ's favor.That isn't fair to Wilder. Offer Wilder a 65/35 split in AJ's favor instead of the flat fee BS and the AJ vs Wilder fight would probably happen and that would be fair pay for both boxers.Wilder won't fight for less than he is worth any more than AJ would. That isnt what is happening here Bolio my man. AJ offered Wilder 12.5mill flat rate based on what they thougt the fight makes and what they think Wilder is worth (bearing in mind it was the first offer in the negotiations so starting low). The 50mill part is Joshua saying "IF the fight is worth 100mill, then i will happily accept a 50/50 split when offered. But its not, so that isnt how much the fight is worth."

Your ilk just cant stand that your time is over We are the future now not you. who exactly is "your" and who exactly is "we"?

Yall are just going to believe Hearn?

I said every Floyd PPV not every top rank ppv. You're being pedantic and boring. You know I wasn't referring to his fight vs Judah :lol1: so when top rank was the promoter people bought the ppv because it said top rank or because floyd was on the card? you can try one more time if you'd like this is getting boring already you were wrong pacquiao wasn't the only one :dunce: