Who was more overrated--Ali or Floyd?

as usual boxrec overrating Fraud jr at # 42. :nonono: 1. Sugar Ray Robinson 2. Henry Armstrong 3. Muhammad Ali 4. Sam Langford 5. Harry Greb 6. Joe Louis 7. Ezzard Charles 8. Willie Pep 9. Roberto Duran 10. Archie Moore 11. Benny Leonard 12. Ray Leonard 13. Pernell Whitaker 14. Bob Fitzsimmons 15. Joe Gans 16. Carlos Monzon 17. Barney Ross 18. Jack Johnson 19. Marvin Hagler 20. Jimmy Wilde 21. Mickey Walker 22. Sandy Saddler 23. Manny Pacquiao 24. Julio Cesar Chavez 25. Alexis Arguello 26. Rocky Marciano 27. Gene Tunney 28. Roy Jones Jr 29. Lennox Lewis 30. Evander Holyfield 31. Bernard Hopkins 32. Barbados Joe Walcott 33. Eder Jofre 34. Tony Canzoneri 35. Emile Griffith 36. Jack Dempsey 37. Charley Burley 38. Kid Gavilan 39. Salvador Sanchez 40. Ike Williams 41. Larry Holmes 42. Floyd Mayweather Jr 43. Thomas Hearns 44. Jimmy McLarnin 45. Stanley Ketchel Floyd ranked @ 42. That's about right.

Twice as many votes for Floyd being more overrated than Ali. I think it is safe to say who carved out the greater boxing legacy.

and there you have it. let this ridiculous poll continue w/o me. Adios casual.

im just trying to gauge the criteria..... whos above him and by how much Who was above him has to take into account not just resume but quality of opposition and wins, how they won, strength of divisions and who sought out he toughest challenges. That can be argued until the end of time since we all have different opinions about his is ranked above or below him. We can argue that forever, but Floyd isn't even in my top 50 all time.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/26AHLBZUC1n53ozi8/giphy.gif nevertheless, this is a silly thread. have fun :beerchug::friday:

Probably been said a few times, but I cba to read through the whole thread, what is overrated about Ali? He said he was the greatest. He is now considered almost universally to be the greatest HW who ever lived. He himself acknowledges he wasnt the GOAT P4P, he said that was Robinson in the interview I have heard. So we know he was talking about himself as the greatest HW of all time. Which he is. Mayweather calling himself TBE is almost laughable. Not to say he isnt a great great fighter, the best of his era. But the more you find out about the careers of guys like SRR, Langford, Greb, Armstrong, Charles etc the more you realise just how preposterously great they were in their eras.

seriously...go look at those guys resumes. how long before any of them fought a live body. if i had to rate them on skill alone - rjj srl hearns duran you are partial towards punchers. your prerogative. i like those sobs too. that wont make me ''hate'' a guy whos clearly the more superior guy in the ring. if you wanted power may, you dont look at his ww record. prior to, he was ending people at a respectable click. i hate using the word if BUT if may had dependable hands, im more than certain his ko % would be higher. lastly, with pitty patting....ww may was always at the power disadvantage. everyone he fought were either naturally bigger and/or had power yet may schooled them. a fight fans hate for may wont allow them to be honest. for every criticism aimed at him, can be aimed at almost everyone. yeah, may is egotistical and not in an enduring way. boo hoo Lmao at this nonsense. Sharmba was bigger than Floyd? Hatton? Marquez? Not even Manny was bigger. Judah wasn’t bigger and neither was Guerrero. What exactly makes Cotto bigger? Shane wasnt even bigger. You’re making these guys out to be King Kong, Godzilla, Superman and Andre the Giant with floyd being Mighty Mouse. I thought this facade of floyd being this little itty bitty guy was finished long ago. Nah uh. Not on my watch pal.

prime ali would be humiliated today. everyone knows it.

so ill ask you, how many would you honestly place above may ? Duran, SRL, Hearns, RJJ...all better fighters. All Mayweather did most of the time was outpoint his way to victory which all the aforementioned could have done easily, but boring the people who came to watch them was worse to them than actually making a fight and possibly losing. Tommy and SRL could pitter patter their way to victory against DLH and Pacquiao without even trying.

No amount of hyperbole by fans can ever do justice to how amazing Ali was. No other fighter was more revered by fellow boxers and even his harshest critics had to concede he was the greatest of all time. Those who disagree are in the minority. Mayweather, on the other hand, declared himself TBE and received a backlash of hate from boxers and fans alike. Those who still insist he's the TBE are a smug, loud vocal minority who think pure defensive boxing and jabbing your way to victory should be on the same level as someone who took risks and entertained the masses. It's not. Never will be.

so, laughing makes may ungreat :dunno: Yeah that or maybe you should reread this thread's title :dunno:

Neither were over rated! Both changed the game and dominated with ease! 100% Fact

"Neither" is a better choice.

hhhmmmm.....great but overrated. hes not super duper great, just regular great. ok, how many are universally recognized as super duper great ?!?!? short list ?!?!? so......... no such thing as a mismatch :dunno: every sap with a pair of gloves on has 50/50 chance :dunno: btw, there are such things as close but clear fights ''we need to see every fight :boxing:.'' and why is it all mays fault that some fights didnt happen :dunno: anyway, id bet every penny i had on may vs those you mentioned, prime for prime. Apparently it went over your head. The idea that if you set the bar at the top, ie., call yourself the best ever or greatest, you now invite speculation and doubt. Unless you think Floyd was the greatest fighter who ever lived then there is room to suggest he is overrated and NOT The Best Ever.

the laugh riot section - margarito !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! freitas !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! casamayor !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! prime pac (may is older and pac avoided his needle demand, doe) !!!!!!!!!!!! meh section - williams is overrated. he was long and sloppy AF. everyone with a little bit of skill was able to hit him. if neanderthal margie (73'' r) was able to land 1k punches, may (72'' r) wouldnt have had too many problems fighting that lanky sob. cotto, meh. on his best day, hes still too easy to hit. ssm, probably the toughest name mentioned. i get it. people dont like may. doesnt make him ungreat. If you read the entirety of my original post you would notice I didn't say he wasn't great. Just overrated. And no, it is not a foregone conclusion he beats any of those fighters. Not when he got gifts against Castillo, washed up Oscar and flat-footed Maidana.

Deluded hater :) Have yourself a good cry fanboy.

Ghost will trigger d sleeping *****es/floydiots. I am a Tbe fan. The best excuses indeed

ill just throw this out there....may was great with what he had (brittle hands) and where it took him (multiple divs). those he ''ducked'' were of little threat, with the exception of winky. would have been boring AF, doe. If they were never a threat he would not have avoided them. Williams, Margarito, prime PAC and Mosley, fresh Cotto, Freitas and Casamayor all legit threats.

He only dared to be elite, but not a Great. He just dared to be elite long enough to be a Great, but never intentionally dared to be Great. Moreover he never fought a great fighter in his prime. 50-0, but rather hollow. Facts about age - It's ring age that matters, not 'age'. Pipino Cuevas HOF was finished by 24 years old, Wilfried Benitez also in his 20's, Morales approaching 30. Hopkins was at the elite level in his 40's. Defensive styles and higher weight classes add to longevity. Mayweather didn't rise up the weight classes in order to fight greats. Floyd RETIRES when he doesn't want to fight stylistic threats. He was surrounded by prime Pacquiao, prime Williams, prime Margarito and prime Cotto during 2007-2009 but fought none of them. Juan Manuel Marquez 1. Outweighed by 4lbs in the weigh in, being involved in one of the biggest catchweight frauds in boxing history. 2. Put on weight the incorrect way. Was slow, chubby. He later put on the weight properly (some boxing ****ysts say potentially by cheating, with him showing visible signs of an HGH gut). 3. Completely stylistically disadvantaged. Conclusion: Marquez in this condition was poor. Not a great win at all. Shane Mosley 1. 38 year old, ancient artefact. Relied on speed and athleticism in his younger days - this is what made him great. 2. 1.5 years after his winning performance against tailor-made Antonio Margarito. 3. Shane Mosley of 2007 = razor close war with Cotto. Shane Mosley of 2000-2003 = razor close war with ATG De La Hoya. There are many levels between prime De La Hoya and Cotto. That's how far Mosley had fallen since 2007. Now add another 3 years, and you have an archaeological discovery from the Neolithic period. (Pacquiao gets no credit for this win, either). Oscar De La Hoya 1. 2007 version of Oscar. He was completely past prime. This was 3 YEARS after his clear loss to Felix Sturm. 2. Oscar had been in wars throughout his whole career, fought so many Great fighters at-or-near their primes. He was war torn and wasn't even seen as much of a boxer anymore. 3. He was depressed, coke addicted. Not bothered about boxing anymore, and was more interested in promoting. He had an awful showing against Steven Forbes immediately after. (Manny Pacquiao gets no credit for the win over a dead Oscar). 4. Regardless of whether Floyd had to fight at 154, that doesn't actually change the fact that Oscar was completely past prime and couldn't pull the trigger anymore. Floyd had major speed advantages. 5. Prime Oscar had a reputation of losing stamina across the stretch. Now imagine a 2007 version, this effect was even greater. This is what allowed Mayweather to win the last four rounds (I had it 8-4 Mayweather), not any adaptive ability. Manny Pacquiao Pacquiao was semi-shot for the following reasons: NB: Semi-shot doesn't mean 'sucks' 1. Aggressive Style, being well over age 30. 2. The expiration dates of fighters spending the majority of their career in the lower weight classes is far quicker. Manny Pacquiao was from the Light Flyweight, Flyweight, Bantamweight, Featherweight divisions. 3. Manny Pacquiao was completely and utterly war torn. He fell from prime since 2010! He had been in so many wars...against ATG's and elite fighters. The Margarito fight took the prime out of Pacquiao. I can't think of any great fighter in the last 25 years who has been in wars against as many great fighters. He looked so lacklustre against Mosley and Marquez. It was consensus that he was fading, and that he had lost the 'killer instinct'. 4. Mayweather's prime weight was 130 (where he started). His speed, power etc. was greater in those weight classes, he was also younger then. Pacquiao actually started at 106lbs (Light Flyweight). 6 weight Divisions from 106-130. Pacquiao's speed, power, athleticism etc. was ECHELONS GREATER at the lower weights. Manny Pacquiao hasn't even knocked anyone out at welterweight since Cotto. So Floyd fought the softest possible Pac. Mayweather is the naturally bigger man with the considerably bigger frame. I am DISGUSTED he couldn't knock little Pac out, shame on him. To make it worse, he only "beat" him on the basis of a couple of light jabs. 5. Pacquiao's killer instinct was already lost, but the KTFO6 by Marquez 3 YEARS PRIOR to the Mayweather fight, had eliminated all traces of killer instinct. He became so cautious. He was no longer the fighter who would take shots from bigger, HARD PUNCHERS like Cotto, Margarito, Morales, Barrera, Marquez and Hatton, to land his own. Pac at this stage of his career couldn't even walk over a featherfist in Mayweather. 6. Increasing emphasis on pure boxing in his career, especially after being KTFO6 by Marquez. This makes his game more predictable to 'boxers'. His crudeness was decreased, his unorthodox manner of aggression had wilted. KTFO6 made Roach turn a lot more towards pure boxing. The very thing that Manny had when prime, was lost. His very threat was in his killer instinct, his ability to take punches to land his own, and his crudeness. All three had been diminished. - This is actually a key point in such discussions. 7. Pacquiao had been more devoted to his career as a congressman, focussing on big boy careers, not mere boxing. 8. Pacquiao had a legitimate shoulder injury that Ellerbe was aware of. Pacquiao had a bad camp due to the injury, unable to take a legal painkiller, too. The OFFICIAL MEDICAL STATEMENT is that Manny Pacquiao had surgery for a torn rotator cuff, a 'significant tear'. 9. Mayweather was apparently so dehydrated that he needed IV's (which are known to be used in sports to mask PED use). Mayweather had the T/E ratio of a 128.5 year old man. Mayweather is not worthy of much credit for this win over 'number 48'. Miguel Cotto 1. The late resurgence in Cotto's career has been due to new tactics under Freddie Roach. Cotto wasn't Roach-trained for Mayweather. 2. Cotto before Roach went on to look so flat and mediocre against gatekeeper Austin Trout. 3. This isn't the killer 140lb or 147lb Cotto, by the way. Cotto is past it. War torn. 4. Cotto would be LUCKY to make HOF, and a large part of it will be due to his popularity. Even if he does I don't consider him a great fighter. Ricky Hatton 1. Mayweather dragged Ricky up to welterweight. Ricky said he didn't feel good there. 2. Ricky Hatton should have lost to Collazo - it was at 147 and he looked bad. Went back down, looked good. 3. Ricky Hatton is no HOF'er. If he gets in, it's largely on the basis of popularity. Definitely not a great fighter. Jose Luis Castillo 1. In the opinion of many, Mayweather lost the first fight. 2. Rematches always favour the boxer, by the way. 3. Mayweather knows what it's like to have a torn rotator cuff, hence him losing to Castillo. Yet Pacquiao is talked down on for his SIGNIFICANT torn rotator cuff. Where is the medical statement to prove Mayweather had a torn rotator cuff/got surgery for it? Was it even a SIGNIFICANT tear? 4. Mayweather did very well to beat this major stylistic threat in the rematch. Castillo would be LUCKY to make HOF, in my opinion he's definitely not. But if he does, he's on the lowest possible tier and not a great fighter. Diego Corrales 1. Not a HOF'er. Just very good. 2. Corrales was heavily overweight and had to crash diet, he took the fight because he needed money to pay lawyers. He was severely drained. Canelo Alvarez 1. Green. Only 22-23 years old. 2. Catchweight king antics by Floyd. Canelo is a real middleweight who was making a mockery of boxing fighting at 154. Floyd dragged him to 152lbs. 3. Canelo was massively stylistically disadvantaged. Can't cut off the ring, plodder with telegraphed punches. 4. Good win despite all of this tbh. Marcos Rene Maidana 1. Marcos arguably beat Mayweather. Mayweather fanboys consistently have differing views on what rounds Maidana won, thus making a case for a Maidana victory. I had it a draw. A draw against a B grade fighter. 2. Mayweather won the rematch, well done, you beat a B grader. Genaro Hernandez 1. Clearly aged over night. At 32 years old, he looked very old. He had a long career. Lacked any sort of sharpness or energy. 2. Massively stylistically disadvantaged. Colon McTapper 1. Self explanatory Everyone else are just chumps like fat, blown up featherweight Guerrero, quitter Ortiz, Andre 440k PPV Berto, past prime Sharmba Mitchell, Zab Judah who Mayweather should have lost to by disqualification (Roger ran into the ring). When you hear 25 world champions, are you aware that there are four ‘world champions’ per weight division? Are you aware that boxers can unjustifiably earn a world title against an overmatched opponent without having to fight those who are genuinely seen as THE best? These are belt holders, not ultimate undisputed world champions. The best boxers lose, especially when they face each other and continue to fight when they’re very past prime. In history, they would fight once every few weeks even if they were carrying injuries into the ring. Hence why they have career records quite like the average Olympic medalists today, who also lose fairly often due to similar schedules. Solid post. I cant imagine Ali ducking Margarito, or saying prime Cotto lives too far. Can’t even see Ali retiring to avoid Paul Williams.

No, a hater just hates for reasons that cannot be objectively discussed. I posed the pros and cons of each fighter and asked posters to discuss who they feel is more overrated based upon opinion, resumes, media hype, fan bases, skills and whatever else they want to consider. You are clearly unable or unwilling to engage in an intelligent manner, which doesn't surprise me in the least. Deluded hater :)