Would Kell Brook had beaten Keith Thurman

I would've picked Kell. We'll never know now.

danny at ww isnt a big win. he has done nothing there. even porter is iffy if that is really a big win but danny was a big name not a big win Good point. Thurman still has top 3 or top 5 resume

its a shame spence cannot get full credit for beating brook because he decided to move up and get his face destroyed. . which is pathetic because he made 147 and didn't look drained to me. i personally give spence full credit but in the history books that win has an asterisk. i would favor brook over thurman 60-40. i think he's a better boxer. his jab and size would be huge hurdle for keith. sht thurman had to box on the back foot to survive danny i think brook can wear him down. i even see thurman having issues vs peterson to be honest. thurman has 2 very big wins. but none were emphatic. both danny and porter feel like they're entitled to a rematch. so its not like keith is so far ahead of the pack. danny at ww isnt a big win. he has done nothing there. even porter is iffy if that is really a big win but danny was a big name not a big win

its a shame spence cannot get full credit for beating brook because he decided to move up and get his face destroyed. . which is pathetic because he made 147 and didn't look drained to me. i personally give spence full credit but in the history books that win has an asterisk. i would favor brook over thurman 60-40. i think he's a better boxer. his jab and size would be huge hurdle for keith. sht thurman had to box on the back foot to survive danny i think brook can wear him down. i even see thurman having issues vs peterson to be honest. thurman has 2 very big wins. but none were emphatic. both danny and porter feel like they're entitled to a rematch. so its not like keith is so far ahead of the pack. it doesnt have an asterik for me. that was a very very good win for spence as i believe brook that night wouldve beat any top ww at the moment including thurman especially if they fought in brooks backyard like errol had to do.

Would make for a interesting fight for sure. While i agree 147 is too low for Brook, he’s still a good solid boxer with power and technigue. I doubt Thurman would give him a CW above ww limit. If he did, that would probably be a very bad business decision on his part and that “0” would be history.

I think stylistically its an intriguing fight. I think Thurman is a tiny bit better in the majority of areas that matter in this fight, I think he's a little faster, slightly better feet, hits a touch harder, has a little more variety. Kell might be better technically, throws straighter, is a bit smoother, and physically stronger. Both guys have proven chins. Both guys can be a little vulnerable to the body. The kicker is I think Thurman is able to make 147 much better. If you look at Brook's two performances vs Carson Jones, at 147 he went life and death, I always found it interesting that the rematch was at 150 and Kell dominated it. I think for that reason I would lean Thurman by close decision. It would be a chess match, but Thurman's freshness and mental and physical freshness down the stretch gives him a close decision win. Above 147, say at a catchweight of 150lbs, I think I would lean Kell.That makes sense to me. Welterweight isn't Brook's best weight and he has told us this many times. I would favor Thurman in a close fight for the reasons given here.

I think it would have been 50-50. He really shouldn't have wasted those good years on Euro bums.

its a shame spence cannot get full credit for beating brook because he decided to move up and get his face destroyed. . which is pathetic because he made 147 and didn't look drained to me. i personally give spence full credit but in the history books that win has an asterisk. i would favor brook over thurman 60-40. i think he's a better boxer. his jab and size would be huge hurdle for keith. sht thurman had to box on the back foot to survive danny i think brook can wear him down. i even see thurman having issues vs peterson to be honest. thurman has 2 very big wins. but none were emphatic. both danny and porter feel like they're entitled to a rematch. so its not like keith is so far ahead of the pack.

Brook would beat the dogsht out of that pony tailed queer thurman.

I would of favoured Brook.

Brook would have schooled Queef Thurman. Brook gave Porter a boxing lesson, Thurman went life and death. Brook way too good.

I think stylistically its an intriguing fight. I think Thurman is a tiny bit better in the majority of areas that matter in this fight, I think he's a little faster, slightly better feet, hits a touch harder, has a little more variety. Kell might be better technically, throws straighter, is a bit smoother, and physically stronger. Both guys have proven chins. Both guys can be a little vulnerable to the body. The kicker is I think Thurman is able to make 147 much better. If you look at Brook's two performances vs Carson Jones, at 147 he went life and death, I always found it interesting that the rematch was at 150 and Kell dominated it. I think for that reason I would lean Thurman by close decision. It would be a chess match, but Thurman's freshness and mental and physical freshness down the stretch gives him a close decision win. Above 147, say at a catchweight of 150lbs, I think I would lean Kell.