Salido's win vs Loma: Just due to low blows? Or good boxing performance?

You're probably right. I was just probably reacting to your overall statements in this thread as opposed to direct responses to me so I do apologize. :usa2: We are cool!

Salido fought dirty as hell, but the biggest reason Loma lost was inexperience on the pro level. And Salido fights like that all the time, he'll sneak in low blows, headbutts, hold and hit, whatever he can get away with, but he has losses in the double digits and Loma did a lot better late in the fight. So that show you with just a little more experience, Loma would have made the right adjustments early in the fight. Salido is just a very seasoned, rough, but clever veteran. And Loma just wasn't ready for all that yet. We all know what happen if they fought again. Great post homie!!! From Hank hill, "I'll tell you hwhat!"

Really? What did I give you for your insults? You're probably right. I was just probably reacting to your overall statements in this thread as opposed to direct responses to me so I do apologize. :usa2:

I was agreeing with that guy you were talking to about how weight doesn't sometimes matter if you have the superior skills, like Floyd and Pac. That's the only part I agreed with and bolded. If it makes you feel good, and boosts your ego, insulting me, go for it. I don't stoop. Whatever. It was a terrible comparison, which is why I called you both out for it.

You talked sh@t to me first jackoff. You get what you give with me Really? What did I give you for your insults?

Low blows or not anyone with half a brain should of had it 8 rounds to 4 for loma. Solido got swept whole second half of the fight.

I'm disputing that Loma should be considered as experienced and seasoned as Floyd or Pacman in his 2nd pro fight dunce. It's obvious but you're just naïve. Hence, me calling you either a teen or a newbie. Newbie. I was agreeing with that guy you were talking to about how weight doesn't sometimes matter if you have the superior skills, like Floyd and Pac. That's the only part I agreed with and bolded. If it makes you feel good, and boosts your ego, insulting me, go for it. I don't stoop.

Salido fought dirty as hell, but the biggest reason Loma lost was inexperience on the pro level. And Salido fights like that all the time, he'll sneak in low blows, headbutts, hold and hit, whatever he can get away with, but he has losses in the double digits and Loma did a lot better late in the fight. So that show you with just a little more experience, Loma would have made the right adjustments early in the fight. Salido is just a very seasoned, rough, but clever veteran. And Loma just wasn't ready for all that yet. We all know what happen if they fought again.

Are you disputing that Canelo and Margarito both outweighed Floyd and Pac? They were also a lot better than Salido. Newbie? Hahaha.. I'm disputing that Loma should be considered as experienced and seasoned as Floyd or Pacman in his 2nd pro fight dunce. It's obvious but you're just naïve. Hence, me calling you either a teen or a newbie. Newbie.

The irony. Look how riled up this gets you. The fight happened ages ago. Let it go. You and the entire legion of morons on the site said Lomachenko would erase him while flying his banner. The fact people still try to argue he won shows the bias of people who can't let it go. It happened, he lost legitimetely. Get a hobby or something, jeez. You talked sh@t to me first jackoff. You get what you give with me

Lol that shows just how very little you know about boxing newbie. I'm sure you started following boxing with Floyds rise to ppv fame lol Are you disputing that Canelo and Margarito both outweighed Floyd and Pac? They were also a lot better than Salido. Newbie? Hahaha..

Man, I remember this fight like it was yesterday...almost everyone was picking Lomachenko to win outright...I was rooting for him because I knew he had the potential to be one of the Top P4Pers and wanted to see him make it past this SIRIous obstacle... Then Salido showed up, gave his all, and monkeywrenched Team Lomachenko's immediate plans...as I, and maybe a few other experts, said could easily transpire... Yes, he came in heavy...yes, he landed blows CLEARLY BELOW the belt (UNLIKE the ones Ward threw in Kovalev II, and you motherf*ckers with ruined lives KNOW this)...yes, Laurence Cole is a piece of sh*t... BUT...after the smoke cleared, and regardless of what the aforementioned ref did or didn't do...Salido simply proved he wanted it more, and that he was the better man that night...it's in the books. So accept it and move on...Lomachenko did...and in less than 3 years after that bout, he is now a consensus Top 3 P4Per... And guess what?...if Crawford slips, AND Lomachenko steps up and beats Mikey Garcia...he will be THE UNDISPUTED #1 like Ward and Mayweather were... Doubt that happens though...:cool: Nah, Salido only proved that he could barely beat a guy in his 2nd pro fight even after ignoring weight and cheating. Not that impressive.

I like these examples. Great observations. Green K. Lol that shows just how very little you know about boxing newbie. I'm sure you started following boxing with Floyds rise to ppv fame lol

Shut your p*ssy whining ass up. Bringing up the Arum approved bought scorecards. That shouldve never been a split decision in the first place. Of course, no mention about the Lomachenko clinches from you so your opinion is biased and stupid. If the ref deducted points it shouldve been for both fighters. But that wouldve upset you too since "Loma is a victim doe." Lol you triggered little f@ggoty a55 b@tch. Say that to a beasts face dumb b@stard and you get dropped.

That'd have been nice, but the ref didn't see it that way. Even if Loma redeemed himself against Salido now, it wouldn't mean anything at all. Loma is on another level at this point, and Salido is finished. No need to waste energy, since there's nothing that we can do to reverse history. Have a good day, bro. Lol I don't care what the ref thought. He was obviously wrong and Loma still landed more punches overall and almost got the ko late. No need for me to change anything bro. You have a good day.

Quit whining. Lomachenko should've had a couple of points docked himself for excessively clinching like his Ukrainian counterpart. Lomachenko was constantly fouling like a one dimensional boxer with limited skills against Salido via excessively clinching. Lomachenko's poor / lack of footwork and defence got exposed against his god Orlando Salido. See how Mayweather performed against a much heavier Canelo Alvarez or how Pacquiao performed against a much heavier Margarito. It was his 2nd pro fight ya twit. Good analogy lol

Man, I remember this fight like it was yesterday...almost everyone was picking Lomachenko to win outright...I was rooting for him because I knew he had the potential to be one of the Top P4Pers and wanted to see him make it past this SIRIous obstacle... Then Salido showed up, gave his all, and monkeywrenched Team Lomachenko's immediate plans...as I, and maybe a few other experts, said could easily transpire... Yes, he came in heavy...yes, he landed blows CLEARLY BELOW the belt (UNLIKE the ones Ward threw in Kovalev II, and you motherf*ckers with ruined lives KNOW this)...yes, Laurence Cole is a piece of sh*t... BUT...after the smoke cleared, and regardless of what the aforementioned ref did or didn't do...Salido simply proved he wanted it more, and that he was the better man that night...it's in the books. So accept it and move on...Lomachenko did...and in less than 3 years after that bout, he is now a consensus Top 3 P4Per... And guess what?...if Crawford slips, AND Lomachenko steps up and beats Mikey Garcia...he will be THE UNDISPUTED #1 like Ward and Mayweather were... Doubt that happens though...:cool:

Quit whining. Lomachenko should've had a couple of points docked himself for excessively clinching like his Ukrainian counterpart. Lomachenko was constantly fouling like a one dimensional boxer with limited skills against Salido via excessively clinching. Lomachenko's poor / lack of footwork and defence got exposed against his god Orlando Salido. See how Mayweather performed against a much heavier Canelo Alvarez or how Pacquiao performed against a much heavier Margarito. I like these examples. Great observations. Green K.

Not really. He fouled more than enough times to draw a point deduction. If the point deduction happens Loma wins so the really didn't win legitimately. Not only that he came in over weight. Stop defending that trash dude. That'd have been nice, but the ref didn't see it that way. Even if Loma redeemed himself against Salido now, it wouldn't mean anything at all. Loma is on another level at this point, and Salido is finished. No need to waste energy, since there's nothing that we can do to reverse history. Have a good day, bro.

Not really. He fouled more than enough times to draw a point deduction. If the point deduction happens Loma wins so the really didn't win legitimately. Not only that he came in over weight. Stop defending that trash dude. Quit whining. Lomachenko should've had a couple of points docked himself for excessively clinching like his Ukrainian counterpart. Lomachenko was constantly fouling like a one dimensional boxer with limited skills against Salido via excessively clinching. Lomachenko's poor / lack of footwork and defence got exposed against his god Orlando Salido. See how Mayweather performed against a much heavier Canelo Alvarez or how Pacquiao performed against a much heavier Margarito.