GGG's Legacy

duran and hearns you can't read either huh Duran prime? :lol1: You're funny. Neither were prime to be honest. Halger has no prime HOFers on his resume.

please, you can't read, or know when to fold 'em didn't you utter this statement: duran was ktfo by hearns worst than pacquiao and hearns had been in wars prior to fighhting hagler.... I'll ask again.....give me 1 PRIME atg that Hagler fought......those names you gave were complete bvllsh1t cause neither were prime which is why i won't even acknowledge them. Give me prime atgs or fvck off.

I can read just fine.....oh, by the way.....you come up with those prime atgs that hagler fought yet? please, you can't read, or know when to fold 'em didn't you utter this statement: duran was ktfo by hearns worst than pacquiao and hearns had been in wars prior to fighhting hagler....

duran and hearns you can't read either huh I can read just fine.....oh, by the way.....you come up with those prime atgs that hagler fought yet?

So no prime atgs? Thanks, thats all i wanted to know. duran and hearns you can't read either huh

It was 2009, not 2010. http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine%27s_Annual_Ratings:_2009 Given the fight took place in May, 2010 Floyd was fighting #1 PFP in the world at that time https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floyd_Mayweather_Jr._vs._Shane_Mosley Typical revisionary pacFUck stuff by pac goons lol chrisJS you are dogs asshole XX Not a Pacquaio fan. I can't stand him or is fans and never cheered louder over a sports moment than December 8th, 2012 (which I was at live). Your English needs work. I don't know what the bold is supposed to mean? Pacquaio was rated #1 by that publication in 2009 and 2010. http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2010

i answered your question straight with duran and hearns, and added as a side note how many fights in hagler was... i thought that was clear enough, but i forgot i was talking to somebody who didn't know duran fought hagler prior to being ko'd So no prime atgs? Thanks, thats all i wanted to know.

i said PRIME atgs you idiot. Lol at mugabi.... i answered your question straight with duran and hearns, and added as a side note how many fights in hagler was... i thought that was clear enough, but i forgot i was talking to somebody who didn't know duran fought hagler prior to being ko'd

duran and hearns, and hagler was 60+ fights in when he fought duran, hearns, mugabi, and the sugar man, so stfu i said PRIME atgs you idiot. Lol at mugabi....

Hagler has ZERO prime atgs on his resume.....name one or stfu. duran and hearns, and hagler was 60+ fights in when he fought duran, hearns, mugabi, and the sugar man, so stfu

Ok, Mosley was the 3rd best fighter in the world in 2010. You go ahead and believe that. Mayweather W12 Mosley >>> Sanchez KO8 Gomez, Hopkins KO12 Trinidad, Hearns W15 Benitez, Chavez KO12 Taylor and = to Jones W12 Toney I'll have to disagree because mythical rankings can and often are false especially when dealing with a washed up 38 year old 10 years past his prime and who was 8 wins in 14 fights and only one clean win (vs. a bum) in that 10 years. Just my standard though after all that version of Mosley is better than all the above apparently. I didn't say whether I agreed with it or not. I merely stated that he was universally considered P4P #3 in 2010 on every list out there.

No it didn't continue because he wasn't on the list at the end of 1998. He wasn't ranked P4P in 1999. Again, as I've said multiple times you can argue whether he should or shouldn't have been all day. That's a different story. However the fact is he was P4P #3. Universally. Ok, Mosley was the 3rd best fighter in the world in 2010. You go ahead and believe that. Mayweather W12 Mosley >>> Sanchez KO8 Gomez, Hopkins KO12 Trinidad, Hearns W15 Benitez, Chavez KO12 Taylor and = to Jones W12 Toney I'll have to disagree because mythical rankings can and often are false especially when dealing with a washed up 38 year old 10 years past his prime and who was 8 wins in 14 fights and only one clean win (vs. a bum) in that 10 years. Just my standard though after all that version of Mosley is better than all the above apparently.

its also a fact that shane was inactive over a year...thats not my opinion its also a fact that shane had been raked through the coals already...thats not my opinion.... you see how it works? you accept my s**t, and I'll accept yours Well yeah those are facts. Well done you are getting better. Again all I was doing was clarifying the fact that Shane was P4P #3 across the board when Floyd fought him.

I'm saying that ranking stood until the March 1999 issue (which was 12 months after his fight with Pestriev or whatever his name was). They eliminated after 12 months of inactivity despite fights scheduled (including the Tito one) so clearly they had more difficult rules and policies to stay ranked (that's when Nigel Collins was editor and wasn't GBP owned). Mythical pound for pound rankings aren't gospel and can be wrong. That's been proven time and time again and it's obviously anyway Mosley was seriously declined (5 losses, 1 win vs. a not so good opponent anyway in 10 years, 16 month layoff and aged 38 is clear evidence of that). At least Whitaker was basically undefeated although a whopping 1 month more inactive and only 34, much closer to his elite days and much, much better than Mosley anyway. No it didn't continue because he wasn't on the list at the end of 1998. He wasn't ranked P4P in 1999. Again, as I've said multiple times you can argue whether he should or shouldn't have been all day. That's a different story. However the fact is he was P4P #3. Universally.

stevie wonder can see that your only option here is to downplay duran and hearns so floyd looks better how stupid you sound really... you trying to compare a win over one of the greatest boxer/punchers on all time, to some shopworn hof's at best and some paper champs... give it up already.. Hagler has ZERO prime atgs on his resume.....name one or stfu.

I'm saying that ranking stood until the March 1999 issue (which was 12 months after his fight with Pestriev or whatever his name was). They eliminated after 12 months of inactivity despite fights scheduled (including the Tito one) so clearly they had more difficult rules and policies to stay ranked (that's when Nigel Collins was editor and wasn't GBP owned). Mythical pound for pound rankings aren't gospel and can be wrong. That's been proven time and time again and it's obviously anyway Mosley was seriously declined (5 losses, 1 win vs. a not so good opponent anyway in 10 years, 16 month layoff and aged 38 is clear evidence of that). At least Whitaker was basically undefeated although a whopping 1 month more inactive and only 34, much closer to his elite days and much, much better than Mosley anyway. ....you broke this down to the least common denominator...much respect....if a floyd boy doesn't respect this statement, they are not hopeless, but hapless...

Where did I post or imply any of these guys were prime? Your personal opinion noted, it would be dishonest for you to post that the overwhelming opinion on NSB was Floyd was scared of Shane and that Shane would beat him. Wasn't reading the forums. I know myself and all my Boxing fan friends knew Mosley was washed up and Mayweather would win easily. That's been the case with nearly every Mayweather fight post 2002. It's part of the reason I've not really been that interested in any of his fights during that time (and skipped many of them) in addition to generally not enjoying the action. I don't really have anything against him - I've never met him. No dishonesty on my part. I'm not surprised people said he was scared or that Mosley would win. Boxing/Sports fans are 50% idiots and 50% smart. Just like the legions on here who swore blind Russell would destroy Loma, that Walters would and that he'd duck Rigo and was running scared. Same with Pacquaio, I'm sure there were tons picking against him every fight and not giving an ounce of credit every fight. Many people pick a side and ride it out and go one way sucking a guy off no matter what and the other way hating and criticizing no matter what. The truth is in the middle usually told by neutral observers like myself.

He’ll be remembered by his 12 groupies here and quickly forgotten by everyone else.

Ok that's May of 1998. In 1999 when he fought Trinidad he was not ranked on the P4P list. I'm saying that ranking stood until the March 1999 issue (which was 12 months after his fight with Pestriev or whatever his name was). They eliminated after 12 months of inactivity despite fights scheduled (including the Tito one) so clearly they had more difficult rules and policies to stay ranked (that's when Nigel Collins was editor and wasn't GBP owned). Mythical pound for pound rankings aren't gospel and can be wrong. That's been proven time and time again and it's obviously anyway Mosley was seriously declined (5 losses, 1 win vs. a not so good opponent anyway in 10 years, 16 month layoff and aged 38 is clear evidence of that). At least Whitaker was basically undefeated although a whopping 1 month more inactive and only 34, much closer to his elite days and much, much better than Mosley anyway.

Well that's neither here nor there whether you care or not. Again just merely stating the fact. its also a fact that shane was inactive over a year...thats not my opinion its also a fact that shane had been raked through the coals already...thats not my opinion.... you see how it works? you accept my s**t, and I'll accept yours