Canelo vs Golovkin: A Technical Summary (video)

Check out my analysis https://youtu.be/5mseiZk0bcU ..................................... :)

Check out my analysis https://youtu.be/5mseiZk0bcU

Good video. Canelo is going to be on the end of that jab all night this Saturday. Thanks. Some people think GGG is going for the Lemieux gameplan but I'm not sure he can pull it off against Canelo. Yeah, the video could have said that in 3 minutes. Well any analysis can be summarized. The point is to show the instances happen often enough that it's a pattern and not just a one-off. To quote Roach, "I don't look for mistakes, anyone can make mistakes. I look for habits."

Yeah, the video could have said that in 3 minutes.

For those who didn't watch because it's a 17 minute video here's a summary Cotto had success with the jab (shows video of Cotto jabbing) GGG has a great jab (shows Lemuiex and Jacobs getting jabbed) Canelo has excellent counters (shows Cotto getting countered) Against bigger guys Canelo has a tendency to drop his output and stay on the ropes (shows him on the ropes against Kirkland and Smith) GGG pummels people against the ropes (shows video of Lemieux, Brook, Jacobs on the ropes) While Canelo may stay on the ropes, his power an accuracy still put Kirkland and Smith away. Then it showed video of GGG getting out boxed by Jacobs and Brook. I think the point was that GGG lacks any kind of head movement and can be hit by speedy guys. Ends by saying GGG can't let his head stay still and allow Canelo to land his combos and Canelo can't let himself get trapped against the ropes. Video didn't give predictions or show why one guy will win, just kinda showed why it's such a perfect matchup. No matter who wins in the ring the fans will all win, except the nuthuggers.

Turn on subtitles for proper viewing! Good video. Canelo is going to be on the end of that jab all night this Saturday.

Wasn't this the guy who picked Pac to beat Floyd? Completely ignored every post about reach because of "angles?" Yup. Aren't you the guy that predicted floyd to walk pac down and stop him because "pacquiao cant fight inside or backing up"?

Don't like it, don't bother. It's simple. Don't stay butthurt years alter. Peace. What do you mean no voiceover or text? There are more than 10 slides of analytical text. My dude, stop crying. The bullsh*t came from you so it's pretty clear it's your ass that's sore if anything. Don't like me calling you out on BS? Don't do BS. Simple. Good luck with your analysis.

What forum? You mean you do this sh*t elsewhere too? Maybe someone posted it here then but I suspect it was you because your name sounded like Bozo. You made your "analysis" public knowledge, so why cry when you get called out on it? I don't doubt that you put in a lot of work but your bias gets in the way and it showed when you posted all that "angle" garbage the last time and were wrong by a whole lot. Quite a few posters were trying to school you but you wouldn't listen. Maybe you should take to the analysis from posters on the boards you spam. Might help you going forward. Peace. Don't like it, don't bother. It's simple. Don't stay butthurt years alter. Peace. No one bothered to sum it up. It's just 17 minutes of video and music, no voiceover or text. No thought. No nothing. What do you mean no voiceover or text? There are more than 10 slides of analytical text.

A lot of truth in the vid, I liked it. As a fan I could kind of discount how ggg went in vs Brook (who couldn't hurt him) and Lemieux (who's not a boxer) and see how he did things in those fights he may not do vs canelo. I also could see thing canelo did vs Kirkland (it seemed the game plan was to let him tire out) and smith (who couldn't handle canelos power and couldn't hurt him) that he wouldn't do against ggg. The biggest take away I had is ggg works at a certain distance and if you are fast enough to lunge in from outside that distance (Jacobs) or fight inside that distance (Brook) canelo can have a lot of success. If ggg gets to fight at his distance (cotto or mayweathers who wasn't shown) canelo will probably have difficulty. Both have stationary heads and

Canelo has been in with some very fast fighters. He's going to see everything Golovkin throws. Canelo faced some laser fast fighters but pretty much eat every straight they threw. He didn't slip or counter them as if he's seeing them. Plus Cotto arm punches, not the whole mass behind it like G's. Accept it or not still watch this,it's fun, I recommend it. :soapbox:

No one bothered to sum it up. It's just 17 minutes of video and music, no voiceover or text. No thought. No nothing. Ok good I wont even bother then. Thanks for saving me 17 minutes.

Gr8 video, without bias or romanticism. Really enjoyed it, most importantly it's realistic Miguel Cotto not even a jabber. GGG is a jabber. And I'm not a rapper. https://i.imgflip.com/vc2l6.jpg?a418032 :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I'm going to watch in a bit. Watching NFL. Sum it up please? No one bothered to sum it up. It's just 17 minutes of video and music, no voiceover or text. No thought. No nothing.

You're dumbing down a debate that happened 6 years ago between multiple posters on a different forum and holding onto that...why? If you don't want to check my analysis then don't check it. Nobody's forcing you. Just stop crying. What forum? You mean you do this sh*t elsewhere too? Maybe someone posted it here then but I suspect it was you because your name sounded like Bozo. You made your "analysis" public knowledge, so why cry when you get called out on it? I don't doubt that you put in a lot of work but your bias gets in the way and it showed when you posted all that "angle" garbage the last time and were wrong by a whole lot. Quite a few posters were trying to school you but you wouldn't listen. Maybe you should take to the analysis from posters on the boards you spam. Might help you going forward. Peace.

Hating what? NSB is paying you to make these posts? ****outtahere. I remember you because I kept trying to tell you that you were discounting Mayweather's reach but your head was so far up your ass you really thought Pacquiao's angles would negate all that. Go ahead, do what you do with these summaries. You're not fooling me but plenty of sheeple on this board will buy in. You're dumbing down a debate that happened 6 years ago between multiple posters on a different forum and holding onto that...why? If you don't want to check my analysis then don't check it. Nobody's forcing you. Just stop crying.

Nope. You keep saying that though. Stay hatin! Cotto always had one of the best jabs in boxing but Golovkin's is definitely longer and likely heavier. And what comes behind it is something Canelo will have to respect much more. Hating what? NSB is paying you to make these posts? ****outtahere. I remember you because I kept trying to tell you that you were discounting Mayweather's reach but your head was so far up your ass you really thought Pacquiao's angles would negate all that. Go ahead, do what you do with these summaries. You're not fooling me but plenty of sheeple on this board will buy in.

Wasn't this the guy who picked Pac to beat Floyd? Completely ignored every post about reach because of "angles?" Yup. Nope. You keep saying that though. Stay hatin! Gr8 video, without bias or romanticism. Really enjoyed it, most importantly it's realistic Miguel Cotto not even a jabber. GGG is a jabber. And I'm not a rapper. https://i.imgflip.com/vc2l6.jpg?a418032 Cotto always had one of the best jabs in boxing but Golovkin's is definitely longer and likely heavier. And what comes behind it is something Canelo will have to respect much more.

Gr8 video, without bias or romanticism. Really enjoyed it, most importantly it's realistic Miguel Cotto not even a jabber. GGG is a jabber. And I'm not a rapper. https://i.imgflip.com/vc2l6.jpg?a418032

Wasn't this the guy who picked Pac to beat Floyd? Completely ignored every post about reach because of "angles?" Yup. And he was right, because Pac did beat Floyd lol.