*In the GGG team as a whole was what the title was meant to say, and Sanchez in particular.
Or is it just Abel talking for the sake of stirring up articles? Because if he or GGG really believe then it should not be taken casually and with a sense of defeatism but the case should be voiced over and over beforehand so as to give it attention and create an atmosphere where it becomes a serious argument that needs to be faced and refuted. Even if they can't unseat any judge or change anything atleast those allegations puts them on the defense, highligting the bias that may come.
...Or maybe the argument is leaning more on the side of a conspiracy thory after all and even if there is some suspicion they ultimately accept that the judging is most likely fair.
But it would be incredibly stupid from Abel to just shrug it off and think "oh that's just the way it is", resolving his team to their fate and that there must be a stoppage/KO. Even if that outcome has always been the strength of GGG you don't do sh1t like that conceding advantages.
And if Abel actually thinks this is a worthwile tradeoff in exchange for some kind of mindgame points where he gets to advocate GGG's knockout power and aggressivness he's clearly way lost crippling his fighter instead of defending him.
He clearly outboxed the guy who was constantly moving, Ggg clearly won 8 to 9 rounds.
Considering that Jacobs didn't even bother to stop throwing arm punches...
lil g just lost again....lol....two in a row now...Smh
GGG folding that WW up as he smacks him all over the ring en route to a 5thround TKO.
https://s16.postimg.org/5u9hyrddh/Untitled-1.gif
GGG after the Jacobs fight:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/g5bJ7ru0FhM/hqdefault.jpg
Jacobs after the fight:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eFYqQPzWkTc/hqdefault.jpg
Why the need for the glasses, it dark?
JAcobs got out landed by about 70 shots total, out jabbed by almost 100 jabs; knocked down. The stats don't support your case.
Funny that it was a welterweight but he couldn't do that to Jacobs or nelo.
Lol
I wouldn't call him an elite boxer but I would say that he can box. He has that Eastern European fundamental style. To me he's like a limited Pirog. Pirog has one shot power. Golovkin doesn't. He has thudding power that gets you over time.
He does a few boxing things well.
1. Jabs to make the opponent move their feet
2. He can do leaping hooks and rights, and punch where the opponents going to go. He's good at hitting a target when the opponent tries to use footwork
Things I think he does bad
1. Can't hit when there's a lot of head movement
2. He doesn't box to keep create oppurnities, he waits until opponent looses focus
3. won't takes risks. Ussually picks safest punch(jab)
4 hasn't fought many guys that can throw a straight punch
He has a strong jab, power in his punch & he pressures that's it. Everything else goes out the window. I gave the fight to nelo by one round. If they rematch my pick will remain the same, nelo wins on the cards.
Oscar is the only reason it's sketch if it goes to the cards we have seen a lot of foockery from judges on his big fight cards. With all that said I don't see this fight going to the cards at all , ggg is looking for the KO and canelo can't move like Jacobs did.
BBB siders getting all their excuses ready for an "I told you so" after the fight.
A few months ago the were saying Canelo won't last 5 rounds with BBB side.
Now BBB side is too old and the judges are corrupt.
BBB side fights two guys with a pulse that aren't on house arrest and suddenly he aged 10 years over night and the man is holding him down. You guys are too funny.
Idk let's see... Draw vs Mayweather when Canelo won maybe 1 round.... Open scoring against Trout had him up like 7-1 or 8-0 vs Trout when the fight was WAYYYYY closer than that... And if I remember correctly they had him up like 118-111 vs Lara in a fight that could have went either way. Hell, even the Cotto fight he had wide scorecards and that fight wasn't the blowout it was scored... GGG has been in 1 close fight and the judges scored it close 115-113 3 ways... So you decide if Canelo seems to have an edge scoring wise from these blind judges
You's was saying before he knocks everybody out all the way upto light heavyweight. Now all of a sudden you're worried about a guy whose never fought at the weight?
Hold on, didn't he just fight ABOVE the weight? Or does that not count for the sake of your stupid argument ?
It's just meaningless talk with no effect on anything. GGG will most likely fight a smart fight without fighting differently than usual to ensure a KO win. GGG always goes for a KO anyway. The judges will score the fight anyway they chose and only they know if they will be fair or not. Many posters on here think GGG must score a KO win and cannot win on points and they have said so. I think GGG can win on points and the judges aren't bought and payed for but I don't know that for a certain. History has shown the judges to be generous toward Canelo in scoring his fights as a rule but not always. One judge voted Lara the winner in a fight I thought Canelo deserved to win.
He has to decisively outbox him or outright beat the shyt out of him. Any swing rounds are going towards Ginger beard.
Nelo had no dramatic moments against Mayweather and still managed a draw on one of the cards... Gimme a break
:lol1:That's the whole point, he can't box! Lol....the boy has pop & that's where it stops. He got outboxed by Jacobs, he was also getting outboxed by a welterweight till he busted his eye socket. He has to KO Nelo to win.
He clearly outboxed the guy who was constantly moving, Ggg clearly won 8 to 9 rounds.
Considering that Jacobs didn't even bother to stop throwing arm punches...
If Dave Moretti and Burt Clements are at ringside, anything is possible. I think in order for GGG to win by decision he will need a couple of 10-8 rounds. This will be a close fight IMO, and possibly a controversial decision that may warrant a rematch. It's a 50/50 fight, but you never know how things will shake out with judges. Can't forget that Oscar was on the wrong end of some bad decisions in Vegas, so it can also work against Canelo as well.
I think fighters will look at some of Canelo's card and wonder.
Trout had at least 1 wide card, Lara a least 1 wide one. But close ones also to be honest.
One of the Mayweather cards was crazy.
Wasn't he up on 2 of the Khan cards also? which i found surprising. I also thought the Cotto cards were too wide.
Like Trout said in an interview today, i think it will be hard for anyone to beat Canelo on points if it's deemed a close fight. I just feel that's how things are.
But if that's what GGG's team thinks, he will have to fight with a mind-set accordingly. Win the rounds big, take the task out of the judge's hands.
I can see Golovkin winning a fight that goes the distance. Maybe a SD.
*In the GGG team as a whole was what the title was meant to say, and Sanchez in particular.
Or is it just Abel talking for the sake of stirring up articles? Because if he or GGG really believe then it should not be taken casually and with a sense of defeatism but the case should be voiced over and over beforehand so as to give it attention and create an atmosphere where it becomes a serious argument that needs to be faced and refuted. Even if they can't unseat any judge or change anything atleast those allegations puts them on the defense, highligting the bias that may come.
...Or maybe the argument is leaning more on the side of a conspiracy thory after all and even if there is some suspicion they ultimately accept that the judging is most likely fair.
But it would be incredibly stupid from Abel to just shrug it off and think "oh that's just the way it is", resolving his team to their fate and that there must be a stoppage/KO. Even if that outcome has always been the strength of GGG you don't do sh1t like that conceding advantages.
And if Abel actually thinks this is a worthwile tradeoff in exchange for some kind of mindgame points where he gets to advocate GGG's knockout power and aggressivness he's clearly way lost crippling his fighter instead of defending him.
ggg can get it if he wins 7 clear rounds, most close rounds tend to go to the fighter who is bringing the crowd...
every punch landed by canelo the crowd will make it count, cant say the same for ggg...
but if ggg dominates 7 or more rounds then he gets the Win...
GGG folding that WW up as he smacks him all over the ring en route to a 5thround TKO.
https://s16.postimg.org/5u9hyrddh/Untitled-1.gif
GGG after the Jacobs fight:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/g5bJ7ru0FhM/hqdefault.jpg
Jacobs after the fight:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eFYqQPzWkTc/hqdefault.jpg
Why the need for the glasses, it dark?
JAcobs got out landed by about 70 shots total, out jabbed by almost 100 jabs; knocked down. The stats don't support your case.
... but Jacobs clearly outperformed... tbh...
I stick by what I said before: If the fight is close, Canelo gets the decision. If Golovkin dominates, I think at least two judges will give him a fair shake.
... I see... Then you assume that there will be the usual "Canelo judging"... OK...