In my opinion. This isn't a head to head match-up but rather what was the better win.
Jacobs>Chavez
Smith>Brook (Smith is actual 154 fighter, Brook isn't 160lber)
Khan>Wade (Wade was wearing ankle braclet in the lead up to the fight and never really accomplished much. Khan was at least a former champ)
Lemieux=Cotto (Can't decide which is the better win)
Monroe>Kirkland
Rubio=Angulo
Lara>Murray
Floyd>Geale
Final Score: Canelo 4, Golovkin 2, Draw 2
https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/19761372_1690733257899717_5470115728810049536_n.jpg
Go from the last 7 because they've won all those it's a odd number and Maywesther basically pitched a shut out over Canelo. Why should that be a advantage for Canelo over beating the sh.it out of Geale a 2time champ.
Jacobs > Chavez : Really nofhing needs to be said but a Questionaboe win over Jacibs a decorated amateur / World Champ is still better then a overhyped weight drained Jr.
Brook > Smih : At least Brook has a couple decent wins and earned his strap. Smith was handed a title over a no name. He has no one recognizable on his resume and hasn't been heard of since
Khan = Wade: Khan has more positives like former World champ good resume but was dragged into a division he has no reason fighting in and before the KO of the year Khan was boxin the sh.it out of Canelo. Wades has accomplished nothing has 1 somewhat recognizable name and didn't deserve the figt but got absolutly wrecked. About even in my opinion.
Cotto > Lemiuex : Cottos a first ballot and while he was on his last legs Canelo beating him to me holds more weight then Gennady destroying Lemiuex a guy who was handed his belt and will never be considered a elite fighter.
Monroe > Kirkland : Monroe had 1 ok win had no power and really didn't pose a challenge. Kirkland while having the better resume and probably being the better fighter , before Canelo Kirkland had like 2 fights in the previous 3-4 years was without Wolfe and was nowhere near the old Kirkland. Has Kirkland even fought since. It's like he's foughf 2-3 fights in the last 6 years. At least Minroe has been had a decent win , active and a low level contender.
Rubio= Angulo : Both fighters only showed up for a paycheque. What's the difference between Rubio looking for a way out as soon as the opprotunity presented itself and Angulo just letting Canelo tee off on his face.
Murray = Lara : Lara a far better fighter but in my opinion there's no way Canelo actually won that fight and shouldn't be given credit for it and Murray didn't really put up a challenge.
Gennady > 3 fights
3 fights about he same
Canelo > 1 fight
Canelo has better names of the last 7, Gennady has the better resume in the last 7
Canelo, their best 2 wins are about even but the rest of the wins slight edge to Canelo. Going back further Canelo wins too due to sugar shane and trout
In my opinion. This isn't a head to head match-up but rather what was the better win.
Jacobs>Chavez
Smith>Brook (Smith is actual 154 fighter, Brook isn't 160lber)
Khan>Wade (Wade was wearing ankle braclet in the lead up to the fight and never really accomplished much. Khan was at least a former champ)
Lemieux=Cotto (Can't decide which is the better win)
Monroe>Kirkland
Rubio=Angulo
Lara>Murray
Floyd>Geale
Final Score: Canelo 4, Golovkin 2, Draw 2
https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/19761372_1690733257899717_5470115728810049536_n.jpg
But is getting swept by Floyd really more impressive than the destruction of Geale? I'd say it's a toss up. Probably lean towards Canelo but wouldn't hate anyone for picking GGG.
Hm..... I guess I have to vote Canelo on resume
But I still think GGG will win
We can all at least agree that this fight will be the biggest win on the winner's resume.