Comments Thread For: McGregor's Coach Would Like Mayweather Bout To Happen at 152

Is there bitterness here? Because that's confusing - are you saying a fighter shouldn't try and get an advantage over his opponent? Im a floyd fan, thing is i didnt hear of the older generation boxers ever giving catch weights to drain there opponents (canelo) and not letting opponents wear there preferred choice of boxing gloves even though they were approved by the commision (Maidana)... All these tactics floyd uses prior to the fight i dont feel are needed as the outcome wouldnt be any different. His talent speaks for itself, rest i personally think is unessesary. Beat a man at his best and thats a victory, like when Connor went up and fought diaz, Connor could have easily requested the rematch be at his own weight but he didnt, he fought and beat Diaz on the exact same terms that he lost to him at... To prove to himself and the world that he is a better fighter and no one could make excuses. Got to applaud connor for that, Floyd would never do anything like that. Im a fan of both but this boxing match is a wash for Floyd.

See this is the sh it that gets to me ala canelo. He is so desperate for the payday he is going to drain himself then complain after. Floyd would never fight him at a CW of 152 because the small percentage of him losing goes up and Floyd isn't about risks especially at40. Either set the terms 150 whatever or don't fight.

Floyd can let Connor come in at 160 and the outcome wont be any different, but this is Floyd the master of sucking every bit of advantage he can out of his opponent, even when its not needed. Floyd wont agree to anything above 147. Id be suprised if he does. Is there bitterness here? Because that's confusing - are you saying a fighter shouldn't try and get an advantage over his opponent?

That's why Floyd will never hurt Conor. Conor has ZERO chance of getting even knocked down in this fight. Floyd will win by Tko, Connor won't have the stamina and ring generalship to survive for 12rds.Floyd will break him down to the body at first and get him tired, Then Connor lack of boxing experience will show and Floyd will step on the gas and put a nice whooping on him in 2 consecutive rounds and then the ref will stop the fight because Connor won't be able to defend himself

What's gonna be funny throughout the build up is you're gonna hear about Floyd sparring MMA guys and stopping them, and on the flip side we're gonna hear Connor sparring boxers and the boxers stopping Connor

Connor is much bigger and Floyd should fight him 155 its bad enough he has every advantage might as well give him something and not face a 0-0 drained "boxer".

Lol Now they wanna talk about weight? Remember this guy is a 2 division belt holder. 145 & 155 in the ufc

Is the weight really relevant? What they going to ask for next Reyes gloves lol!!!

At 147 and a pillow size gloves.

Exactly. Comments like this make me wonder how any supposed negotiations are going. This 'fight' isnt happening the fight will definitely happen, no question that was McGregor's coach giving his 2c he is not involved in the negotiation I doubt they will spend too long discussing weight, if at all

By all means have the fight at 152. McGregor needs every advantage he can get in this joke of a mismatch.

I doubt this weight happens two or three pounds more and that's Floyd's walking around weight he's not going to give up that much might be right at the Welter limit or 48 no more...

These mofoz know that they aint wearing those lil' black baby gloves right?? (These idiots are delusional) ZERO chance So they should say.. hey we will lose. Lets drain ourselves anyway? It's useless fight I know...

Says the guy who couldn't grammatically distinguish the use of the word "Lets" from "Let's." :pat: Maybe OJ can give me advice on anger management too while we're at it. Yes "we're" not "were." Lol. You're trying too hard. You made yourself look retarded. I had the sense to correct it when I thought it might not be right. You actually thought the correct word was pre-Madonna. Did you stop and think- hey, this is the name of an entertainer? Dummy.

LMFAO! You mentioned Floyd's name 4 times in the post I quoted. If anyone wanted to deep throat him, they couldn't because you are firmly gripping his waistline with your mouth full of his genitals. Maybe when you go back to 3rd period remedial English class with Floyd you will get from under his desk, go back to your desk, and learn how to use words properly. Says the guy who couldn't grammatically distinguish the use of the word "Lets" from "Let's." :pat: Maybe OJ can give me advice on anger management too while we're at it. Yes "we're" not "were." Lol.

LMAO it will be floyd-weight, which will be 147 no if's and but's Exactly. Comments like this make me wonder how any supposed negotiations are going. This 'fight' isnt happening

Lets = allow. You just Google'd, so you should know. You edited it because you knew you were caught being a pretentious pr1ck. Nice try though you supercilious, stubborn pos. Maybe if you spent more time reading vocabulary books and less time deep-throating Floyd, you would know better. LMFAO! You mentioned Floyd's name 4 times in the post I quoted. If anyone wanted to deep throat him, they couldn't because you are firmly gripping his waistline with your mouth full of his genitals. Maybe when you go back to 3rd period remedial English class with Floyd you will get from under his desk, go back to your desk, and learn how to use words properly.

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/lets-vs-lets/ The Difference Between Let’s and Lets Let’s and lets are based on the same verb, let, which means to allow or give permission. Let’s is a contraction of “let us.” You use it to make suggestions about what you and someone else should do. Let’s go to the movies. Let’s invite Mom. Lets is the third-person singular present tense form of verb let, which means to allow or give permission. If Mom lets us go to the movies without her, I’ll be surprised. You sure I used it incorrectly? Lets = allow. You just Google'd, so you should know. You edited it because you knew you were caught being a pretentious pr1ck. Nice try though you supercilious, stubborn pos. Maybe if you spent more time reading vocabulary books and less time deep-throating Floyd, you would know better.

"When you use the wrong words you change the substance of the post. The problem isn't auto-correct, it's that you have a limited vocabulary because, lets face it, you are not the brightest light bulb in the pack. Actually, let me type this how you would've- ewe our not the brite-est lite bulb in de pac." Nice last second edit LOL. This was your post LOL. "Lets" face it - grammar matters! :pat: https://www.grammarly.com/blog/lets-vs-lets/ The Difference Between Let’s and Lets Let’s and lets are based on the same verb, let, which means to allow or give permission. Let’s is a contraction of “let us.” You use it to make suggestions about what you and someone else should do. Let’s go to the movies. Let’s invite Mom. Lets is the third-person singular present tense form of verb let, which means to allow or give permission. If Mom lets us go to the movies without her, I’ll be surprised. You sure I used it incorrectly?

"When you use the wrong words you change the substance of the post. The problem isn't auto-correct, it's that you have a limited vocabulary because, lets face it, you are not the brightest light bulb in the pack. Actually, let me type this how you would've- ewe our not the brite-est lite bulb in de pac." Nice last second edit LOL. This was your post LOL. "Lets" face it - grammar matters! :pat: What a pretentious, petty Cuck.