True or False Floyd beats every fighter in 140 history?

If you were to take the top 10 atgs capable of fighting at 140 and had a tournament where they all had to fight each other. Everyone is taking L's. Thats true ,if you will fight all best boxers in tehyr prime you will take Ls

If you were to take the top 10 atgs capable of fighting at 140 and had a tournament where they all had to fight each other. Everyone is taking L's.

I know i don't speak pact@rdism - but please point out how you gave Floyd the benfit of doubt in this post: Oh That's right : haven't seen enough evidence to make a call = well thought out opinion based on fact in pact@rdism logic. You are one shltty poster. A shltty poster that you feel compelled to keep quoting and debating with. Looks like I got under your skin. If I wasn't making a valid point you would have never quoted me to begin with. I touched a nerve, which isn't very hard to do with Floyd fans. LOL.

We are talking about 140 here, and I just gave Floyd the benefit of the doubt versus Crawford at 140, what more do you want? You fanboys are unreal, you aren't happy unless everyone is down on their knees unconditionally sucking Floyd's nuts. I know i don't speak pact@rdism - but please point out how you gave Floyd the benfit of doubt in this post: There's a healthy list of dudes who crush him at 140. None of whom he would have ever got into the ring with. At this point, I haven't seen enough of Crawford to make a call. He has the skill set, but he's never been in with anyone at that level yet. He's still untested. Doesn't matter though, you can add Bud to the long list of fighters Floyd would have ducked in their prime. Oh That's right : haven't seen enough evidence to make a call = well thought out opinion based on fact in pact@rdism logic. You are one shltty poster.

He lost to Castillo , Chavez would have kept breaking him down a Prime Chavez not a 100 battle battle worn Chavez who fought Whitaker. Pryor would have been all over him he really lost to Madaina and Pryor is way better than Madaina. There was a reason why Leonard and Hearns avoided Pyror

You just said Floyd would duck Crawford???? Lol. Wtf? That's benefit of doubt? Lol. Hate is strong in you. Yet you have to admit - if Floyd didn't duck Crawford the excuse would be too green. It's true, despite whether or not he could or could not have beaten him, he would not have fought Crawford. No way, no how. He was too busy fighting guys like Bruseles, Gatti and Mitchell.

i think he'd be a hell of a performer at the weight, but there's nothing he's done in his career that leads me to think he'd beat roberto duran. styles make fights. if there's a poor man's duran on floyd's resume it is jose luis castillo.

We are talking about 140 here, and I just gave Floyd the benefit of the doubt versus Crawford at 140, what more do you want? You fanboys are unreal, you aren't happy unless everyone is down on their knees unconditionally sucking Floyd's nuts. You just said Floyd would duck Crawford???? Lol. Wtf? That's benefit of doubt? Lol. Hate is strong in you. Yet you have to admit - if Floyd didn't duck Crawford the excuse would be too green.

I can hear it now - Floyd beats Crawford - easily = Crawford is too green. Lol. What's the point. No matter what Floyd does you're going to hate it. Question - is Crawford better or more dangerous than Canelo? We are talking about 140 here, and I just gave Floyd the benefit of the doubt versus Crawford at 140, what more do you want? You fanboys are unreal, you aren't happy unless everyone is down on their knees unconditionally sucking Floyd's nuts.

There's a healthy list of dudes who crush him at 140. None of whom he would have ever got into the ring with. At this point, I haven't seen enough of Crawford to make a call. He has the skill set, but he's never been in with anyone at that level yet. He's still untested. Doesn't matter though, you can add Bud to the long list of fighters Floyd would have ducked in their prime. I can hear it now - Floyd beats Crawford - easily = Crawford is too green. Lol. What's the point. No matter what Floyd does you're going to hate it. Question - is Crawford better or more dangerous than Canelo?

Aaron Pryor would beat him up but fraud moneystealer would probably retire if Pryor called him out and by default floyd beat him in fantasy fights.

There's a healthy list of dudes who crush him at 140. None of whom he would have ever got into the ring with. At this point, I haven't seen enough of Crawford to make a call. He has the skill set, but he's never been in with anyone at that level yet. He's still untested. Doesn't matter though, you can add Bud to the long list of fighters Floyd would have ducked in their prime.

I think so, but one can make the case that it Whittaker could beat him. I think it's a more solid case to say Floyd was the best 130 lb fighter ever.

Did Floyd have many fights at 140? Only one I can think of off top of my head is gatti A 50 50 fight would be against hatton in manchester. Or against PAC in Philippines PAC would be favourite 70 30

False in my opinion. I think Jose Napoles, Ray Robinson, Henry Armstrong and Robert Duran could all beat him when they fought at 140 pounds. There might have been others who were better than him at 140 but that's enough better 140 pounders to make the statement false.

I'm sure many can beat him. Whether they'd get mugged by judges I can't guarantee that though.

even his wife! Lmao you wrong

cavs blew a 3-1 defecit. deal with it! LMAO never looked at it that way.

Floyd beats everybody even his wife!

Warriors are the cheapest team in NBA history. cavs blew a 3-1 defecit. deal with it!