When Crawford moves up!!!

You better start shack shopping. i make good money...plus i always land on my feet in any situation lol anyways...i dont see it happening anytime soon so

i would bet the ranch on spence beating crawford You better start shack shopping.

SMH. We haven't even seen Crawford at 147 yet. Like I said before Crawford will be a slight under dog against some guys at147

But Floyd backed him up for the first half of the fight though!!!. And the comparison was simply about the smaller man having the technical advantage, which Crawford would certainly have against Spence. having a technical advantage is nice....but is it so much of an advantage, in this case, that it can help crawford keep a guy like spence off him for 12? i think spence is one of those guys that just cant be stopped from doing what he likes to do over 12.....if crawford can outbox him for 4-6 rounds is that going to help him win? im not sure...i mean brook wasnt looking too bad through 6 either....but it wasnt enough..... and that spence jab wasnt too bad either...it set the tone early on that eye.....and that body work too man? wooo.....i dunno if crawford technical abilities are gonna stop spence from doing what he does over the full 12

Canelo and floyd is a bad example because canelo was drained and weak and is not known as a come forward fightsr and doesnt know how to cut off the ring. Spence is in his prime knows how to cut off the ring and isnt drained against crawford if they ever fight. But Floyd backed him up for the first half of the fight though!!!. And the comparison was simply about the smaller man having the technical advantage, which Crawford would certainly have against Spence.

Will Spence want them problems? He did well yesterday. But I think it's clear that Terence is the better boxer of the two. And with Bud being able to switch up the angles, fight long and short, hit and move etc!!..I think Spence would be advised to get Thurman quickly and then move up to 154. Bud is at 140 & I don't think he can beat Errol at this time. The weight right now is the factor.

Canelo and floyd is a bad example because canelo was drained and weak and is not known as a come forward fightsr and doesnt know how to cut off the ring. Spence is in his prime knows how to cut off the ring and isnt drained against crawford if they ever fight. Canelo wasn't drained. So stop right there. Floyd was just too fast for him & Floyd hits harder the you think.....

Canelo and floyd is a bad example because canelo was drained and weak and is not known as a come forward fightsr and doesnt know how to cut off the ring. Spence is in his prime knows how to cut off the ring and isnt drained against crawford if they ever fight. ive seen much of your work and already know you are an idiot...but you are right, here, for the most part...cept for canelo was "drained"...thats complete rubbish youve made up......your hero is going to have more problems with canelo than floyd did and youve already set up your excuse as to why...lol

Crawford own words is Spence is toooooo much

Yes Spence is good. But the question I have is can someone like Errol, who, let's be honest, is pretty straight forward in his approach. Outbox a guy who has so many dimensions like Crawford does? I mean on a technical level I give the advantage firmly to Crawford. Strength and power will no doubt lie with Spence. But as we saw in the Floyd/Canelo fight, that often isn't enough. i hear you....like i said...i think that guys are looking at what they saw last night and thinking spence aint a top level "boxer"....but as good as spence did you could tell he wasnt satisfied....he wasnt at his best and he knew it but he had alot of things working against him..he was off 9 months...fighting in brooks backyard...and brook is awkward and does some unconventional stuff....i actually think spence might have an easier of a time against crawford than he did against brook as weird as that sounds....and as good as crawford is.....

i dont think anyone can handle spence for 12.....i just dont see it...and i think crawford has proven to be a top 10 p4p guy without question...i think spence is the goods tho....spence is a different class than anyone crawford has beaten even though id say crawfords resume is better than spences at this point..... Yes Spence is good. But the question I have is can someone like Errol, who, let's be honest, is pretty straight forward in his approach. Outbox a guy who has so many dimensions like Crawford does? I mean on a technical level I give the advantage firmly to Crawford. Strength and power will no doubt lie with Spence. But as we saw in the Floyd/Canelo fight, that often isn't enough.

What's your reasoning bro? :boxing: i dont think anyone can handle spence for 12.....i just dont see it...and i think crawford has proven to be a top 10 p4p guy without question...i think spence is the goods tho....spence is a different class than anyone crawford has beaten even though id say crawfords resume is better than spences at this point.....

When Crawford moves up!!! Will Spence want them problems? He did well yesterday. But I think it's clear that Terence is the better boxer of the two. And with Bud being able to switch up the angles, fight long and short, hit and move etc!!..I think Spence would be advised to get Thurman quickly and then move up to 154. ... Spence vs Crawford is a fight too far, tbh...

i would bet the ranch on spence beating crawford What's your reasoning bro? :boxing:

i would bet the ranch on spence beating crawford