Kell Brook Media Creation

Jim Watt was awful with scorecards man. His scorecard for Quigg/Frampton was a draw which is horrible. Brook didn't go life and death with Jones in the 2nd fight. Dominated and stopped him. But you compared him to Carl Froch. These sky guys get paid to say what they say so you cannot blame them. As for life and death not a good look fighting him twice he was supposed to dominate and stop him the first time. Who rematches journey men

Jim watt is usually pretty good with his scorecards you cannot compare him to Carl froch. Also it was sky and don't forget the payola involved. Either way it doesn't look good when home tv stations had you losing the fight. However it was a close fight judges proffered kells cleaner work. Could've gone either way. It is well documented he ducked fighters coming up rather going life and death with Carson Jones lol. Twice smh Jim Watt was awful with scorecards man. His scorecard for Quigg/Frampton was a draw which is horrible. Brook didn't go life and death with Jones in the 2nd fight. Dominated and stopped him.

He had 3 minutes to go guy sheesh. Stop riding him so hard.

How is he very good what has he don't to show that he is very good. He is overhyped they built him as next best thing since sliced bread he does not deserve those accolades. My mans a quitter no respect coward dude. Even malignaggi fought with a broken jaw against a monster in cotto this dudes a fraud. Eye is one thing Jaw is another! Your Vision is far more important!

Yes he is to a certain degree Just look at his top 5 best wins. Also the first time he fought some one with a punch and some skill at welter he quit. There is a reason he was one of the most carefully managed fighters in the game taking over a decade to fight a puncher and now we know why

No he wasn't, Brook is still very good, he start off this match very well but as MANY including myself posted Body Shots and Spence Jr Inside Game would break him. Said he could NOT Clinch Spence Jr like he did Porter because Spence Jr has a NASTY inside Game and honestly the Clinching was his Downfall because Spence tore him apart on the inside How is he very good what has he don't to show that he is very good. He is overhyped they built him as next best thing since sliced bread he does not deserve those accolades. My mans a quitter no respect coward dude. Even malignaggi fought with a broken jaw against a monster in cotto this dudes a fraud.

Sky was Jim Watt scoring who is the reverse of Froch. For some reason was majorly negative towards UK fighters. Brook clearly beat Porter by 3 rounds and most media scorecards had it that way, very good win for Brook and Porter is still a great fighter these days and Thurman had a much closer fight with Porter. He also never had the Maidana fight on offer, and the Bradley fight was never going to happen either in 2010 because the Alexander unification was in plans and Bradley was moving up not long after. Brook lost his WBO ranking when he moved to Matchroom and had to start all over again which is why it took long and had **** competition for so long. I said it in another thread. He should've fought Alexander, Chaves, and Vargas which were all on offer and he would've been a much better WW. Chased that Khan fight too much too. Jim watt is usually pretty good with his scorecards you cannot compare him to Carl froch. Also it was sky and don't forget the payola involved. Either way it doesn't look good when home tv stations had you losing the fight. However it was a close fight judges proffered kells cleaner work. Could've gone either way. It is well documented he ducked fighters coming up rather going life and death with Carson Jones lol. Twice smh

No he wasn't, Brook is still very good, he start off this match very well but as MANY including myself posted Body Shots and Spence Jr Inside Game would break him. Said he could NOT Clinch Spence Jr like he did Porter because Spence Jr has a NASTY inside Game and honestly the Clinching was his Downfall because Spence tore him apart on the inside

I said he's not complete garbage and you're somehow turning it into "praised for his defeats". I'm not making excuses for him or trying to paint him as something he's not. I'm just not down with this, "you lost to the best in the world so you're trash" bullshyt. I don't dismiss a fighter after a loss. But Brook is a star and he didn't really beat any star opponents. He didn't fight Chaves, Vargas, etc, other fighters that could had made his argument better

He won every round before the eye injury so what does that make spence getting owned by a bum??? It's a 12 round fights forget the eye injury for a second. Why was brook standing around like a bellend from the 7th onwards that bodywork is a muthafka

Guys I live in the UK and the media hype was crazy. They showed Kell Brook fighting Godzilla and loads of Japanese people were saved when he gave the big bastard lizard an overdose of chocolate brownies!

So he gets praised for his defeats. He has good skills but his best win is a close decision against Porter where he held to dear life. I said he's not complete garbage and you're somehow turning it into "praised for his defeats". I'm not making excuses for him or trying to paint him as something he's not. I'm just not down with this, "you lost to the best in the world so you're trash" bullshyt.

He won every round before the eye injury so what does that make spence getting owned by a bum???

Get brooks brownie out your Mouth Hold on mate, just one more.

Ozone layer is getting thinner. The world needs more doctors. War is breaking out everywhere. Don't waste a serious answer on plumbs! Just wind em up!! Get brooks brownie out your Mouth

Sky was Jim Watt scoring who is the reverse of Froch. For some reason was majorly negative towards UK fighters. Brook clearly beat Porter by 3 rounds and most media scorecards had it that way, very good win for Brook and Porter is still a great fighter these days and Thurman had a much closer fight with Porter. He also never had the Maidana fight on offer, and the Bradley fight was never going to happen either in 2010 because the Alexander unification was in plans and Bradley was moving up not long after. Brook lost his WBO ranking when he moved to Matchroom and had to start all over again which is why it took long and had **** competition for so long. I said it in another thread. He should've fought Alexander, Chaves, and Vargas which were all on offer and he would've been a much better WW. Chased that Khan fight too much too.

It took him 12 years to start mixing it up with decent opposition and when he did he quit bar porter who is good but nowhere near great. Spence also is good but we don't know how great he could be. He is still learning and will get better

Brook is legit. Even in defeat, he looked fantastic at times tonight. Just because you're not #1 doesn't make you a zero. So he gets praised for his defeats. He has good skills but his best win is a close decision against Porter where he held to dear life.

Brook is legit. Even in defeat, he looked fantastic at times tonight. Just because you're not #1 doesn't make you a zero. Ozone layer is getting thinner. The world needs more doctors. War is breaking out everywhere. Don't waste a serious answer on plumbs! Just wind em up!!

Brook is legit. Even in defeat, he looked fantastic at times tonight. Just because you're not #1 doesn't make you a zero.