Davis got a win over Pedraza, who is a decent fighter. I just watched the fight again though and thought Pedraza fought a terrible fight. Was leaning in, dropping his hands, and giving away his advantages. I think he could have pulled off a decision win if he fought smarter. He was looking good when he boxed at range.
I don't know how good Walsh is, I've only seen some clips. I'm not that impressed with Davis though. He is just another Broner.
You were proven to be wrong.
Well to be fair, my prediction was for his career as a whole. I am far more impressed with his victory over Pedraza than I am with his victory over Walsh. He is probably better than Broner though.
Broner 2.0
Hating ass non sense.
Just pretend his name is Tank Davisovic and enjoy the ride.
:lol1::lol1:
Hey if he proves me wrong, I'll give him full credit.
I think Davis is much better than Broner. He is a serious boxer who does the things Broner so often doesn't do. He trains hard. He makes weight. He throws 60 punches a round, not 25 punches a round like Broner. He knocks
almost everybody out. He doesn't clinch and hold like an octopus.
We'll see if he can maintain discipline better than Broner, but he has only fought one good fighter. An impressive win to be fair, but I saw a lot of flaws and he seems like an idiot.
In my opinion Walsh has almost no chance to win. Davis will knock him out and I am sure about that. Davis throws very fast. accurate bombs. It won't last very long.
I think Davis is much better than Broner. He is a serious boxer who does the things Broner so often doesn't do. He trains hard. He makes weight. He throws 60 punches a round, not 25 punches a round like Broner. He knocks
almost everybody out. He doesn't clinch and hold like an octopus.
Richard Dwyer has picked Walsh to win by KO...so yea Walsh is f#cked.
:lol1::lol1:
I was almost tempted to put some money down, but the odds aren't tempting enough. I suspect if he beats Walsh, I'll be able to make some money betting against him down the road, just like I did with Broner :fing02: