Hey dickhead .. it was you talking about how many likes and dislikes The New Face of Bullshit was getting.
I just responded to what you said.
I was responding to some GolovTard who was saying it was overwhelmingly against Canelo when (at that time) the margin was only six.
Moreover, even though this margin is now a lot wider, all that means is a lot of Lil g's fans care enough to sign on for a thumbs down. That said, there are similar youtubes where the margin is the other way.
In other words, I don't really give a fugg. If you do, fine.
Aint gonna change shyt doe.
:rofl: You're so ****ing dumb.
3x the draw is a 75%/25% split. You ****ing retard. Canelo would get 75%, Golovkin 25%. A 3:1 ratio.
Keep embarrassing yourself you clown.
If Golovkin earns 1 and Canelo is 3x the draw it means he earns 3. A 3:1 ratio. :dunce:
Hahaha, 3x (three (3) times (x)).
Goodnight stupid. :dunce::crazy:
How did i state it differently you retard? I said Canelo is 3x the draw, would Golovkin accept 25%. :dunce: :rofl:
Go back to school. You failed hard.
3:1 ratio is not the same as 3x the draw.
You're too stupid to understand the difference doh.
3x the draw is what you said.
So, by your calculations 3 X 25% = 100 ?
:banana::smashfrea
Nelo lol hes a big pusss, he was afraid of getting counter by MoneyMay during there match
So why is GGG afraid to make money on an easy fight that would put him the biggest stage n the biggest purse wtf lol easy fight for a great reward
Let me help you. Think of total earnings for the fight as 100%. Now divide the pie so that Canelo makes three times as much as Golovkin:
Canelo 75%
Golovkin 25%
That is your 3 to 1 ratio, because 75 = 3 x 25.
That's right.
If the original post would have said it in those terms it would have been correct, but he stated it differently.
How are my percentages off? 75% is 3x 25% you retard. :rofl:
33.333% would be 2:1. :dunce:
Ok, I'll spell it out for you.
You said "Canelo is 3x the draw that GGG is". And went on to say, that means that Golovkin should only get 25%......Read that carefully......Are you still not understanding?
3 X 25% = 75% ...yet you were saying that Golovkin deserves 25% because Canelo is a 3 X greater draw? Hahaha
The 25% value that you gave Golovkin would have made sense if you had said that Canelo is a 4X greater draw than GGG.
4 X 25% = 100%
Stay off the crack, boy.:crackhead
There's no point in trying to talk rationally with someone who is mentally challenged, as you clearly are. You can't even comprehend simple mathematics.
Uh...., your calculations are a little off. :smashfrea
If Canelo has a 3 times greater draw that would mean Golovkin is worth 33.33%.
Let me help you. Think of total earnings for the fight as 100%. Now divide the pie so that Canelo makes three times as much as Golovkin:
Canelo 75%
Golovkin 25%
That is your 3 to 1 ratio, because 75 = 3 x 25.
Eric Gomez vice president of Golenboy told Rafael the offer was atleast 15 mil.
If true, then GGG's team is dropping the ball.
I have never heard any of the Golden Boy team talk in detail.
They seem to skirt around the subject but never just blurt out what they want.
They didnt offer a percentage because they dont care if the offer is accepted, and are only "negotiating" for the PR value. They hope Jacobs wins, or something else happens.
What nobody wants to talk about though is that its likely not the money that is the biggest stumbling block here. Its what other terms are likely to be in that "offer". Is Golden Boy demanding options on GGG? Is Golden Boy trying to limit GGGs money in a potential rematch? Is there an escape clause that would let GBP get out of the deal? They put a rematch clause in the Chavez deal so I can GUARANTEE you there is an escape clause in the GGG offer.....
There are alot of different ways to torpedo a deal besides just money.
This I definitely agree with, we are not sure what other terms would be input in that contract, if it's strictly $15m flat fee I say take it. And then destroy Canelo but there would or might be a lot of things attached to that $15m.
This are the little fine print or details, we don't get to see or read about. It's plain obvious that GBP would prefer this fight to happen in another 2/3 years, and I don't believe they would negotiate in good faith.
But if and that's a big "if", they offered that money without too many stuff attached to it then take it.
People keep referring to a $15 million dollar offer but have not heard Canelo or Oscar give an amount. I've seen articles with a flat offer but with no amount attached to the flat offer.
I really do believe GGG team are wrong here, flat fee or no flat fee they need Canelo name on their resume, beating Canelo helps GGG a lot for future fights/references. They need to do whatever they can to get that fight for him before he gets too old, at the end day Canelo would continue fighting and making his money. No need to delay this fight IMO.
1 = 25%, 3x1 = 75% :dunce:
You clearly have no understanding of what you spoke about in the post I responded to.
You said "Canelo is 3 times the draw that Golovkin is". Your percentages are incorrect....You need to go back and learn your grade 2 math. Haha :dunce: :crackhead
You been talking about this a lot, please tell us what are the terms that make you discredit that offer since the very beginning??
Thank you bro good post
They didnt offer a percentage because they dont care if the offer is accepted, and are only "negotiating" for the PR value. They hope Jacobs wins, or something else happens.
What nobody wants to talk about though is that its likely not the money that is the biggest stumbling block here. Its what other terms are likely to be in that "offer". Is Golden Boy demanding options on GGG? Is Golden Boy trying to limit GGGs money in a potential rematch? Is there an escape clause that would let GBP get out of the deal? They put a rematch clause in the Chavez deal so I can GUARANTEE you there is an escape clause in the GGG offer.....
There are alot of different ways to torpedo a deal besides just money.
You been talking about this a lot, please tell us what are the terms that make you discredit that offer since the very beginning??
You said this:
The article said this:
"Sergey and Vadim took Gennady to the boxing gym as an eight-year-old. When they saw the damage which those young fists were capable of they picked street fights for him against grown men, which he invariably won, as a hardening process for the boxing life to come."
Now how the fuck do you turn that into Golovkin and his brothers beating up random civilians just because of the victims race?
It was implied in another interview in Russian I will look for them
Speaking of outside of the norm, when was the last time a fighter with ZERO quality wins got a 15 million dollar offer to fight anyone? It's OK, you can say it NEVER!
Rather when has a man with zero quality wins been sO highly rated?
Now the fact he is so highly rated, you should get paid for being a superstar of boxing. GGG hasnt fought other superstars yet that's why he's been underpaid. Doesn't mean nelo can continUE to underpay