Hatton, Brook, and Khan... RANK'em

as far as accomplishments?? Hatton Khan Brook

Hatton Khan Brook Hatton - there's no shame having losses to May & Pac. He has Ws over Kosta and a couple other semi decent notable wins. #1 at 140 Khan - Has some decent wins over some names but has losses to lesser opponets. Brook - 1 notable win , loss to Gennady but shouldn't be held against him the rest of his resume is sh.it Ricky is a maniac

In head to heads I think Brook beats them both. But he deserves to be ranked below both....at the moment. Brook vs Hatton at 147 - Hatton would have got an absolute shoeing Yeah, i'd agree with that :ANYWORD:

Hatton Khan Brook.

In head to heads I think Brook beats them both. But he deserves to be ranked below both....at the moment. Brook vs Hatton at 147 - Hatton would have got an absolute shoeing

This isn't even a competition so far: Hatton Khan Brook If Brook can get a win over Bradley/Pacquiao at welter and then win a title at 154 against one of the top 4 guys in that division then I'd rank him higher. Expect laceddown and the rest of the idiots to come on here and say Brook ranks higher lol

I'd go with Hatton, he worked his way up the hard way and finished at the very top just coming up short. Khan on the other hand was given gifts or fed bums in the early part of his career and when he stepped up he got beat by guys like Peterson and Garcia. Oh and career is effectively over already. Brook could do more, if beat beat Spence, Khan and got a title at 154 there would l d be a good argument for Brook being second to Hatton.

What an insult to Ricky Hatton too be compared to these two -- is British boxing this bad?

Hatton Khan Brook Hatton - there's no shame having losses to May & Pac. He has Ws over Kosta and a couple other semi decent notable wins. #1 at 140 Khan - Has some decent wins over some names but has losses to lesser opponets. Brook - 1 notable win , loss to Gennady but shouldn't be held against him the rest of his resume is sh.it