Pacquiao looked like absolute trash tonight. He'd get beat by multiple 147 contenders

Pac beats every WW right now. Spence needs more experience to compete with someone like Manny. Manny wasn't at his best tonight. He clearly was holding back because he could've done some series damage against Vargas.

pacquiao would beat the living **** out of broner, that's why he turned down the biggest payday of his career :rofl:

LOL @ Spence not being able to beat Pacquiao. He'd destroy this version of Pacquiao. He's too big and strong for him.

Nonsense. Sure, I'd take Errol Spence over him. He's younger, bigger, stronger and hits harder. But the other guys you named? I'd still at age 37 take Pacquiao over them. Especially Thurman. People act like Thurman is going to run over Pacquiao but he couldn't even Ko a ****ing 40 year C-level fighter like Bundu. If you can't KO a 40 year old, you're overrated. Period. Plus, Thurman hasn't KOed anyone in a really long time. so I'd definitely take Pacquiao in that fight. Crawford would be interesting. I'd lean toward Pac though. If Brook can still make 147, I'd probably take him to beat Pacquiao. But that's like 2-3 guys tops. Pacquiao would still be competitive in those fights despite being like a decade older. Bundu's been KOed by 1 guy his entire career and it was just in his last fight, yeah such an old bum. Not saying Pacquaio won't beat the hell out of Thurman, but the logic of that one was baffling. Everybody isn't there to be KOed. Spence is just that good. Otherwise I agree with the rest.

http://i.imgur.com/BPQpXXS.gif That right hand is going to put Pac to sleep again. Whew, that was a bad right hand.

I had IT closer to 114-113 then those garbage cards of 118-109.

https://i.imgflip.com/1dm9e0.jpgvia Imgflip Meme GeneratorMaybe one day there will be a cure for ignorant. Until then i wish you the with your struggle https://imgflip.com/i/1dm9e0

http://i.imgur.com/BPQpXXS.gif That right hand is going to put Pac to sleep again.

I think him and Bradley are the only 147 guys in the top 10 P4P lists around so by default, he's probably the best WW until he gets overtaken.

He just won a world title by a lopsided ud so how does that equal looking like trash. Mayweather didn't shut him out before so what makes you think a rusty, older Mayweather would shut him out now? If any of those guys beat him in a real fight then they beat him. They don't get an automatic win over Pacman just because you say so. Moretti had the correct scorecard

If manny pacquiao is the best welterweight in boxing at the current moment, then the welterweight division sucks ass. He's clearly not the best welterweight in boxing if you saw what transpired tonight

It wasn't regular Pacquiao but he's still top of the division. I'd give him the edge against most guys at 140-147. Guys I'd favour are probably Spence or Crawford. Spence is nowhere near the position to get the Manny fight though compared to other PBC fighters and Crawford probably is going to be denied by TR until Manny's about to retire and needs to pass the torch.

And almost got knocked out with one shot causing the ref to end the fight ten seconds early. Gotcha. He still looked stellar vs him. (Almost) getting dropped doesn't change that. He won 10/11 rounds

#48 is a little past his prime & he STILL puts in work. What, are you fckers expecting him to be 2009 #48? get the fck outta here. #R2SPECT to #48 for still laying the pipe down to these weak ass young negros.You could show him more respect by calling him by his correct name and not #48.

Bradley schooled him until getting rocked in the last round. And almost got knocked out with one shot causing the ref to end the fight ten seconds early. Gotcha.

To be honest it looked like paq never turned it on tonight. Lets assume thats the best he has left, there is a short list of fighters at WW that can handle the Paq we saw tonight. Spence is too green, he gets beat. Thurman and Brook may get him.

Spence, Brook, Thurman, Crawford. Those guys all would beat Manny. Mayweather would shut him out in a rematch.He just won a world title by a lopsided ud so how does that equal looking like trash. Mayweather didn't shut him out before so what makes you think a rusty, older Mayweather would shut him out now? If any of those guys beat him in a real fight then they beat him. They don't get an automatic win over Pacman just because you say so.

Decent scrap, 116-111 for Pac in my eyes. It was overshadowed at times by Stephen A Smith, who made me believe they should have put Stephen Hawking there for the job instead.

Nonsense. Sure, I'd take Errol Spence over him. He's younger, bigger, stronger and hits harder. But the other guys you named? I'd still at age 37 take Pacquiao over them. Especially Thurman. People act like Thurman is going to run over Pacquiao but he couldn't even Ko a ****ing 40 year C-level fighter like Bundu. If you can't KO a 40 year old, you're overrated. Period. Plus, Thurman hasn't KOed anyone in a really long time. so I'd definitely take Pacquiao in that fight. Crawford would be interesting. I'd lean toward Pac though. If Brook can still make 147, I'd probably take him to beat Pacquiao. But that's like 2-3 guys tops. Pacquiao would still be competitive in those fights despite being like a decade older. Name one fighter who KOd Bundu before he fought Thurman.

Also, name one fighter that has looked stellar against Vargas. Bradley schooled him until getting rocked in the last round.