Jacob's W over Quillin better than any W on GGGs resume @160

I guess i'll take your advice from here out on that and not respond further because you quote my red k statement while claiming I said that you called Danny's pirog loss "great" you need reading comprehension skills "in what world does a KO loss to Pirog >> anything on GGG's resume? troll" You do know thats the "greater than" sign right? LMFAO Cant be calling out "reading comprehension" skills if you yourself dont have them.

Ah, Ill have to watch it again. I have a vague recollection of the fight. I was probably hammered when I watched it. You might want to be hammered again because outside of the knockdowns it's a pretty boring fight.

Nah, based on the scorecards the draw verdict was rendered only because of the fluke knockdown. Had the ref done his job and correctly ruled it a slip (if one of the judges can see it from ringside then so should the ref) Andy Lee would have won 114-112. I can't possibly see giving Quillin more than 5 rounds personally, especially after Lee dropped him and Quillin fought scared the rest of the night. Also Quillin fatass missed weight. Ah, Ill have to watch it again. I have a vague recollection of the fight. I was probably hammered when I watched it.

You are referring to the Lee fight im guessing. Its the only draw I know of Quellin has, if memory serves it seemed like Quellin should have won that fight and Im a Andy Lee fan. Its been a while though. Nah, based on the scorecards the draw verdict was rendered only because of the fluke knockdown. Had the ref done his job and correctly ruled it a slip (if one of the judges can see it from ringside then so should the ref) Andy Lee would have won 114-112. To put it into reference none of the judges saw Quillin winning the fight based on rounds. I can't possibly see giving Quillin more than 5 rounds personally, especially after Lee dropped him and Quillin fought scared the rest of the night. Also Quillin fatass missed weight.

I guess i'll take your advice from here out on that and not respond further because you quote my red k statement while claiming I said that you called Danny's pirog loss "great" you need reading comprehension skills Why did you get emotional and send him private messages? King Krusher got emotional and did the same thing to me. You and King Krusher should hook up. You'd make a good couple.

1. I disagree. 2. Geale was more accomplished, beat higher ranked fighters, beat better fighters, and won more championships. 3. Quillin spent 3 years fighting unranked middleweights. 4. When he did fight a rank middleweight he got a draw (should have been a lost.) 5. The second time he fought a ranked fighter he got sparked out in one round. 6. If Quillin wasn't American he wouldn't be getting this praise. 7. If you think Quillin is the best win between Golovkin and Jacobs you're an idiot. You are referring to the Lee fight im guessing. Its the only draw I know of Quellin has, if memory serves it seemed like Quellin should have won that fight and Im a Andy Lee fan. Its been a while though.

:rofl: 1. If You start your first point with a lie then the rest of your points are automatically invalid. "in what world does a KO loss to Pirog >> anything on GGG's resume? troll" Literally what you sent. 2. Jacobs vs Pirog was a title fight, not a "prospect stepping up" 3. No **** sherlock. 4. The outcome of the fight doesnt change the fact that Danny fought Pirog who is greater than anybody on GGs resume. Meaning Danny has fought the tougher competition aka better resume. /end I guess i'll take your advice from here out on that and not respond further because you quote my red k statement while claiming I said that you called Danny's pirog loss "great" you need reading comprehension skills

If youre going by "im not a GG nuthugger" then you fooled me because thats definitely some nut hugging statements to be making. Saying GGs resume is great but PQ's resume is **** is a total contradiction. Its basically where I can tell ydksab. Theyre close enough that they were ranked #1 and #2 at one time. Jacobs win over Peter Quillen is better than anyone on GGGs resume, youve yet to prove OP wrong or myself. Beating the #2 MW > youre whole argument I never said anything about Golovkin having a great resume, because it's not. Don't know why you said that when I sure never did. It's just much better than Quillin's, who has only beaten Hassan N'Dam.

1. never said that you called Danny's loss to Pirog great. 2. if Danny was prime in 2010, then what is he now, super-duper-ultra prime? He wasn't prime then, he was a prospect stepping up in competition. 3. GGG/Pirog was on the menu until Pirog retired due to injury. 4. while some might give a guy credit for a spirited, competitive loss...there is no credit given for being knocked out, doesn't matter by who. FIN :rofl: 1. If You start your first point with a lie then the rest of your points are automatically invalid. "in what world does a KO loss to Pirog >> anything on GGG's resume? troll" Literally what you sent. 2. Jacobs vs Pirog was a title fight, not a "prospect stepping up" 3. No **** sherlock. 4. The outcome of the fight doesnt change the fact that Danny fought Pirog who is greater than anybody on GGs resume. Meaning Danny has fought the tougher competition aka better resume. /end

"in what world does a KO loss to Pirog >> anything on GGG's resume? troll" Lets talk about this private message you sent with some red k like a hoe instead of discuss openly here. First, i never said a KO loss to Pirog is great. Thats you making things up. Second, The challenge was great. Two prime fighters going at it was great. Ill even add that Pirog vs Jacobs > GG vs Proksa. If Pirog vs GG happened it would be considered a great fight. It would be considered Golovkins most legit, Prime vs Prime fight. Even in a loss thats still a good name on Jacobs resume as far as who he has fought compared to GG. 1. never said that you called Danny's loss to Pirog great. 2. if Danny was prime in 2010, then what is he now, super-duper-ultra prime? He wasn't prime then, he was a prospect stepping up in competition. 3. GGG/Pirog was on the menu until Pirog retired due to injury. 4. while some might give a guy credit for a spirited, competitive loss...there is no credit given for being knocked out, doesn't matter by who. FIN

Quillin has looked good before, but that was at the prospect level, and when he fought N'dam. The guy has not impressed since N'dam. are you saying we should be impressed by PQ because he KO'd the male stripper Zerafa in 5? He probably belongs at 168lb "in what world does a KO loss to Pirog >> anything on GGG's resume? troll" Lets talk about this private message you sent with some red k like a hoe instead of discuss openly here. First, i never said a KO loss to Pirog is great. Thats you making things up. Second, The challenge was great. Two prime fighters going at it was great. Ill even add that Pirog vs Jacobs > GG vs Proksa. If Pirog vs GG happened it would be considered a great fight. It would be considered Golovkins most legit, Prime vs Prime fight. Even in a loss thats still a good name on Jacobs resume as far as who he has fought compared to GG.

I never commented on the quality of GGG's resume, that wasn't what we were discussing. Winky is the biggest name on either resume but don't get cute...he was already shot and on his last fight. PQ don't get too much credit for that win. Since you bring it up though, GGG's resume leaves a lot to be desired, specifically, an elite middleweight. But so far he's done what an elite middleweight should do to the B and C class fighters...blow them out. PQ struggled vs a similar class of fighter and got KO1 by Jacobs (a B fighter imo) I can't entertain you anymore you seriously trolling or dksab Up to the point of losing to Danny Jacobs, Peter Quillen has done the same as in beating who he was supposed to beat. Old vets, club fighters, low top 20's, and low top 10's. Ive already conceded GGs resume is better but im not going to kid myself and say its head-ass-and shoulders above Quillens. Up to the point of losing to Danny Jacobs GGs resume was only slightly better and calling them comparable is more accurate than not.

Quillin's best (and only halfway relevant) win is Hassan N'Dam. Other than that he beat no one relevant. Even his win over Rosado was questionable, and that might be his second or third best win. That's just...nowhere near the same as Golovkin's career. Not even close. I can't believe anyone would genuinely think that. If youre going by "im not a GG nuthugger" then you fooled me because thats definitely some nut hugging statements to be making. Saying GGs resume is great but PQ's resume is **** is a total contradiction. Its basically where I can tell ydksab. Theyre close enough that they were ranked #1 and #2 at one time. Jacobs win over Peter Quillen is better than anyone on GGGs resume, youve yet to prove OP wrong or myself. Beating the #2 MW > youre whole argument

"Quillin's best (and only halfway relevant) win is Hassan N'Dam." Wrong. Andy lee is his best win. Also, Lee was robbed against quillin MAJOR. Quilling is not very good :lol1: Quillin/Lee was a draw

"Quillin's best (and only halfway relevant) win is Hassan N'Dam." Wrong. Andy lee is his best win. Also, Lee was robbed against quillin MAJOR. Quilling is not very good

lemeuix would splatter quillin

Quillin's best (and only halfway relevant) win is Hassan N'Dam. Other than that he beat no one relevant. Even his win over Rosado was questionable, and that might be his second or third best win. That's just...nowhere near the same as Golovkin's career. Not even close. I can't believe anyone would genuinely think that. bro, Rosado was up on my card when that fight was stopped. PQ was very lucky.

Their resumes both leave a lot to be desired. Neither one looks stellar. Actually Winky Wright is a better name than anybody on GGs list but im not going to consider that version of Winky a high quality win. Their resumes are both littered with the same type of ESPN level characters its not even debatable. I never commented on the quality of GGG's resume, that wasn't what we were discussing. Winky is the biggest name on either resume but don't get cute...he was already shot and on his last fight. PQ don't get too much credit for that win. Since you bring it up though, GGG's resume leaves a lot to be desired, specifically, an elite middleweight. But so far he's done what an elite middleweight should do to the B and C class fighters...blow them out. PQ struggled vs a similar class of fighter and got KO1 by Jacobs (a B fighter imo) I can't entertain you anymore you seriously trolling or dksab

Quillin's best (and only halfway relevant) win is Hassan N'Dam. Other than that he beat no one relevant. Even his win over Rosado was questionable, and that might be his second or third best win. That's just...nowhere near the same as Golovkin's career. Not even close. I can't believe anyone would genuinely think that.

Theres the cop out. You dont know what the **** youre talking about so I must be a troll. This is a direct quote son. You mention one name at the end and the rest is typical female emotions. " He never did anything or beat anyone. His best win is Lemieux's best win. He looked terrible against everyone he fought, even the awful Salka-level fighters he beat. He never, EVER showed in the ring that he was better than Geale, Macklin, Lemieux, or Murray. Hell, he couldn't even prove he was better than Rosado when they fought. " Any more excuses? Quillin has looked good before, but that was at the prospect level, and when he fought N'dam. The guy has not impressed since N'dam. are you saying we should be impressed by PQ because he KO'd the male stripper Zerafa in 5? He probably belongs at 168lb