I work for the law firm dotting the i's and crossing the T's.
104 shows a year x 10 years.
2 month on Fox
Rest on FS1/affliates
500 Million per year pay to PBC with 10 year guarantee. 5 Billion lifetime of contract. On par with the NHL deal with NBC.
FOX gets 100% advertiser rights/revenue and 50% of venue fee.
This explains the non existent fall schedule.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2013/06/I-dont-believe-you.gif
Exactly. Nobody, and I mean nobody - would give a ten year guarantee for starters, but clearly a number of other stupid points. Over 100 shows a year , are you crazy? Quality over quantity! How would they even advertise that! Ffs shutting up now because clearly loads of Shute
I didn't say that I wanted this nor do I think it would/could happen I was simply saying if this were true (which we all know isn't likely) PBC would have to steal fights or work with others in order to fill dates.
That would be ideal, but with damn near every big promoter signing exclusive deals with networks, it seems unlikely. Well, unless you have fights mandated to happen from the sanctioning bodies.
Well the Op's 500 Million for 104 cards a year is LOL inducing, but I have noticed that Networks are investing in boxing again. If the fox deal arrives, it will mean more boxing for everyone.
The OP was talking absolute rubbish (British voice). Stop, FOX is not giving no 104 cards per year deal lol. And why would you want that? More boxing in all likelihood just equals less quality. There will be plenty of big cards and lower level cards via both SHO/FOX/FS1 to satisfy the viewing audience.
I didn't say that I wanted this nor do I think it would/could happen I was simply saying if this were true (which we all know isn't likely) PBC would have to steal fights or work with others in order to fill dates.
True 104 is excessive however and this is a really big IF this were true that means pbc would essentially be giving two fights a week and he would have to get the extra fighters from somewhere possibly stealing fighters/fights from espn/toprank deal. Imagine international fights/fighters having the option of being broadcast on ESPN+ or fox sports on tv which as a promoter would you pick?
Yeah I know this is way far off. But know one really knows anything until the deal is announced.
The OP was talking absolute rubbish (British voice). Stop, FOX is not giving no 104 cards per year deal lol. And why would you want that? More boxing in all likelihood just equals less quality. There will be plenty of big cards and lower level cards via both SHO/FOX/FS1 to satisfy the viewing audience.
You're obsessed with my name change. Is it a crime to change title on here?
Way to duck the question.
Dramashow you aren't dead, you're like PBC-new name, same ol' BS.
when are you guys going to realise pbc is already dead. its just showtime boxing with a new name. haymon just couldnt get his concept to work
SO if it's showtime boxing with a new name then it isn't dead, right?
Sort of like how you are no longer dramashow but still have the same anti Haymon bias and lack of common sense.
Well, how many legit fighters does Tom Brown have anyways that aren't Haymon guys? Which guy does he have independent of Haymon? Dibella has some, but not really the case for Tom Brown.
TR has 54 cards per year, but a good portion of that is international cards. I'm interested in seeing how that plays out as they can't pick up Matchroom cards. And SHO is likely to pick up cards of fighters like Frampton/Fury/etc.
FOX doesn't need a crap load of cards. With SHO putting on about 20-24 cards a year, they only need 6-8 big FOX cards. That will equal big time quality. And then they can put some solid fights from fighters trying rebuild themselves and prospects on FS1.
True 104 is excessive however and this is a really big IF this were true that means pbc would essentially be giving two fights a week and he would have to get the extra fighters from somewhere possibly stealing fighters/fights from espn/toprank deal. Imagine international fights/fighters having the option of being broadcast on ESPN+ or fox sports on tv which as a promoter would you pick?
Yeah I know this is way far off. But know one really knows anything until the deal is announced.
Well top rank has a deal for 54 fights but they don't have that amount of fighters. If haymon could put lou dibella fighters, tom brown, or any other promoters fighters than its possible.
Well, how many legit fighters does Tom Brown have anyways that aren't Haymon guys? Which guy does he have independent of Haymon? Dibella has some, but not really the case for Tom Brown.
TR has 54 cards per year, but a good portion of that is international cards. I'm interested in seeing how that plays out as they can't pick up Matchroom cards. And SHO is likely to pick up cards of fighters like Frampton/Fury/etc.
FOX doesn't need a crap load of cards. With SHO putting on about 20-24 cards a year, they only need 6-8 big FOX cards. That will equal big time quality. And then they can put some solid fights from fighters trying rebuild themselves and prospects on FS1.
Not as insane as 104 shows a year. Fighters be in the ring, Sam Watson saying "Great fight, now get back in the gym, youre back out there again next week"
Well top rank has a deal for 54 fights but they don't have that amount of fighters. If haymon could put lou dibella fighters, tom brown, or any other promoters fighters than its possible.
when are you guys going to realise pbc is already dead. its just showtime boxing with a new name. haymon just couldnt get his concept to work
Bookmarks for later
500 million a year is insane
Not as insane as 104 shows a year. Fighters be in the ring, Sam Watson saying "Great fight, now get back in the gym, youre back out there again next week"
Obviously OP’s dea ll structure is ridiculous, but when the real deal gets announced, there are going to be some glum looking boxing folk around, from Eddie Hearn (so long dreams of signing a big name) to genrick and killakali.
500 million a year is insane