Who had the more entertaining style: Butterbean or Wlad?

More exciting, Butterbean, but he was not ever really a contender.

Klitchkos style is more for ppl who like technical boxing ... Not really dude. I am drawn to technical fighters the most and I can't stand Wlad. You can be technical and boring, and you can be technical and exciting. Guys like Rigo, Lomachenko, Bradley, Fury, Golovkin, Roman, and Kovalev are all technical fighters who I consider exciting to watch. Then there are guys like Devon, Wlad, Ward, Shiming, who I just really can't get into at all, and won't tune in to watch them intentionally.

Lol @ the Bill Cartwright reference.

There is a difference between being historically significant and being entertaining. They are not always one and the same.

Mr. T was a wrestler as well as a bouncer. He could probably kick some butt in real life.

I'd like to see him vs a 1980s Mr T. Id piti the fool who took an 80's version of Mr. T.

Nothing is less entertaining than Wladimir Klitschko. And I've seen Henri Akinwande fight. How did I miss this gem of a post? :lol1:

Not sure the word "Style" has anything to do with either man. Bean was a freak show 4 round guy who never was a serious competitor as far as contending for a title. Wlad was a 1/2 stand up boxer who had a weak chin and held anyone that got close. Neither man will be remembered in the future as a great boxer/fighter. Ray Interesting point of view as always. Thanks for your thoughts, Ray.

Nothing is less entertaining than Wladimir Klitschko. And I've seen Henri Akinwande fight.

this is so disrespectful

Let's just say it like it is, Wladimir is safety first but he is guy who will risk a lot more than Andre Ward so If you want to critique so hard you must be judging Ward as an absolute joke of a fighter.

Yet not only you voted, you also felt compelled to post in. :lol1: Andre Ward is more boring to watch than Wladimir Klitschko let me hear you cry.

Wlad and Ward are boring but Ward is the more boring of the two that dude can't even go for the kill absolutely boring ass POS.

Not sure the word "Style" has anything to do with either man. Bean was a freak show 4 round guy who never was a serious competitor as far as contending for a title. Wlad was a 1/2 stand up boxer who had a weak chin and held anyone that got close. Neither man will be remembered in the future as a great boxer/fighter. Ray

Butterbean.....

So far 78.95% of the poll voters are picking Butterbean. Lol because most people on here are either new or hate wlad. If anyone saw him early in his career they would see a varied offense that was running guys over or leading to him getting his bell rung. After the Brewster debacle he altered his style completely. The Sam Peter fights made him even more unwatchable. But if you see him fight Mercer, Byrd, Barrett, etc, there's no way you could say he's not entertaining and certainly more so than butterbean lol

You must be new to boxing because the first half of wlad's career was quite entertaining. So far 78.95% of the poll voters are picking Butterbean.

Butterbean really didn't box, he brawled, that's why he lost to a former HW champ almost 20 years after his prime. Thread is a nonsense waste of web data. Yet not only you voted, you also felt compelled to post in. :lol1:

You must be new to boxing because the first half of wlad's career was quite entertaining.

I forgot how fat he was. He could punch but he is knocking out bums in that highlight film.