Canelo's bad situation

meh hell make more money than all those guys u listed and even though hes not, will probably go down as a better fighter than all the guys you listed (except GGG) so dont really see a crisis

He can reach down 1 weight division(147) and bring up a big name fighter to fight him.

Actually, I predicted that Canelo would beat Lara by controversial decision. It was obvious, after having seen him getting a draw from a judge against Mayweather and getting the win against Trout, lol. As for educating the community, then all you can come up with is subjective opinions. You can never disprove anything I say. I, on the other hand, is showing to talk the talk AND walk the walk. I bring the evidence in form of correct predictions. And it hurts you to see how well I'm predicting the fights. You wish it was you. You're one of those guys who only make predictions regarding easy fights and you're probably one of the idiots who said that Santa Cruz would KO Frampton easily, LOL. If you want the fame, then stop being lame and start becoming a name. Develop some unique skills or whatever. :rofl: You are one insecure dude. What subjective opinion? Your idiotic opinion that ray leonard is the 2nd best middleweight of all time? That is definitive proof that you don't know the sport. Keep regurgitating the picks from whatever youtube channel you get them from...you need this. :lol1::lol1:

This thread is incredibly disrespectful to the Lineal 155lb Champion. He can suck a 155lbs dick. His homosexual teacher, De La Hoya, is probably teaching him how to "marinate" it well before the sucking begins.

This thread is incredibly disrespectful to the Lineal 155lb Champion.

Sounds like you got canelo vs lara wrong. :lol1::lol1: Educating the community...like when you said sugar ray leonard was a top 3 middleweight all time? Actually, I predicted that Canelo would beat Lara by controversial decision. It was obvious, after having seen him getting a draw from a judge against Mayweather and getting the win against Trout, lol. As for educating the community, then all you can come up with is subjective opinions. You can never disprove anything I say. I, on the other hand, is showing to talk the talk AND walk the walk. I bring the evidence in form of correct predictions. And it hurts you to see how well I'm predicting the fights. You wish it was you. You're one of those guys who only make predictions regarding easy fights and you're probably one of the idiots who said that Santa Cruz would KO Frampton easily, LOL. If you want the fame, then stop being lame and start becoming a name. Develop some unique skills or whatever.

1. Lara wasn't robbed. 2. I give Canelo a chance against anyone at 154 and 160 and he'd probably be favorite in a lot of those fights. If anyone is in a tough spot it's GGG. 34 years old and a loss might be a death sentence. Canelo is 26 and still young. Most don't even count the loss against Mayweather against him since he was young and May is an ATG. 1: Yes, he did. You don't score a fight according to the sound of the audience, but according to who controls the fight. Lara proved to be the technically superior boxer, but everyone knows how protected Canelo is now, so Lara would up his game further in a rematch. 2: Based on what? Based on struggling against a small old Cotto who had done nothing for years, except getting schooled by Trout and beating a cripple? Last time I made a wrong prediction was when I predicted that Canelo would KO Cotto. Since then, I lost all respect for him. There's no excuse that he wasn't able to KO Cotto. And doesn't it mean anything to you that Canelo not only lost to Mayweather, but was his easiest victory in many, many years, easier than even Guerrero? Mayweather won every round clearly and exposed Canelo as the technically limited and flawed fighter that he is. Yeah, like predicting the result of every damn fight before it happens? Educating the community? Sounds like you got canelo vs lara wrong. :lol1::lol1: Educating the community...like when you said sugar ray leonard was a top 3 middleweight all time?

People who say "he was running!", "he was only going backwards!", etc., etc., are mainly idiots who don't understand the technical aspects of the sport. Hit and don't get hit. Hate it or love it. Canelo was missing all night and while Lara's jabs and potshots were weak, they were plenty and they were clear. Canelo had nothing to offer that night and you have been brainwashed by that homosexual fool called De La Hoya. He is feeding you this Canelo **** to make money. Well in that case I can beat all the top fighters I'll just jab jab jab run backward jab jab jab run backwards That was running not boxing. Mayweather Whittaker sugar ray that's boxing that's swimming without getting wet

Canelo's screwed lol..no where to go :ugh:

No way in hell do the Charlo's beat him. Andrade would have the best chance at 154 and I would still favor Canelo in that fight. Matter of fact, the only guy I would favor over Canelo at either weight class would be GGG

canelo beats both charlos and probably most of PBC 154 pounders

Canelo is in a real crisis. He's stuck between 154lbs and 160lbs. He can fight in both weight classes, but both of them are full of guys who can beat him. At 154lbs, he would lose to Andrade, Charlo 1, Charlo 2 and Lara (who got robbed in their first fight). At 160lbs, he would lose to Golovkin, Saunders, Eubank and Jacobs. He can keep fighting small guys like Cotto and Khan or fight shot fighters like Kirkland or irrelevant fighters like Angulo, but sooner or later, the retarded Mexicans will realize that something's wrong. He can't go beneath 154lbs. And while he CAN go above 160lbs, he would lose to everyone there, so that's a no-go. In other words, he's stuck between 154lbs and 160lbs and there is 8 fighters there who can beat him. Time is ticking, fat ginger... I only see him losing to Golovkin and Saunders, the rest he beats. Lol at Canelo losing to a Charlo. Canelo's only crisis is that he won't be the big star he is right now if he continues ducking. He's supposed to be the face of the sport.

The Charlo's can't beat Canelo. I would only favour Andrade and Golovkin over him.

You are right 1: Yes, he did. You don't score a fight according to the sound of the audience, but according to who controls the fight. Lara proved to be the technically superior boxer, but everyone knows how protected Canelo is now, so Lara would up his game further in a rematch. 2: Based on what? Based on struggling against a small old Cotto who had done nothing for years, except getting schooled by Trout and beating a cripple? Last time I made a wrong prediction was when I predicted that Canelo would KO Cotto. Since then, I lost all respect for him. There's no excuse that he wasn't able to KO Cotto. And doesn't it mean anything to you that Canelo not only lost to Mayweather, but was his easiest victory in many, many years, easier than even Guerrero? Mayweather won every round clearly and exposed Canelo as the technically limited and flawed fighter that he is. NO Top Boxer will lost again Canelo

How can Lara win when he was literally running backwards all night. He lost and handily. Floyd schooled him and he stood in the pocket and wasn't back peddling If you watch the Floyd fight again it was funny because canelo was getting pressured and waking backwards against Floyd of all people. I'm not sure how good canelo us but then again I'm not sure how good most of those 154 160 ponders are either. Only thing I know for sure is that ggg would be at least a 5/1 favorite against all of them.

People who say "he was running!", "he was only going backwards!", etc., etc., are mainly idiots who don't understand the technical aspects of the sport. Hit and don't get hit. Hate it or love it. Canelo was missing all night and while Lara's jabs and potshots were weak, they were plenty and they were clear. Canelo had nothing to offer that night and you have been brainwashed by that homosexual fool called De La Hoya. He is feeding you this Canelo **** to make money. I don't know, can I safely say he was doing a whole lot of moving without punching then? It's bad enough that he didn't even counter when he made Canelo miss. What can I call it then?

The Charlos don't stand a chance, I can't see none of them winning more than 3 or 4 rounds.

How can Lara win when he was literally running backwards all night. He lost and handily. Floyd schooled him and he stood in the pocket and wasn't back peddling People who say "he was running!", "he was only going backwards!", etc., etc., are mainly idiots who don't understand the technical aspects of the sport. Hit and don't get hit. Hate it or love it. Canelo was missing all night and while Lara's jabs and potshots were weak, they were plenty and they were clear. Canelo had nothing to offer that night and you have been brainwashed by that homosexual fool called De La Hoya. He is feeding you this Canelo **** to make money.

Spot one once again! Canelo could have lost to Trout he well yeah he pretty much did lose Lara he was missing a lot of shots and he couldn't hit his opponent cleanly hellish fight for him! Andrade could beat him but Canelo has a punchers chance and at 154lbs we have to remember IF he isn't on some good PED's he is going to be absolutely *****d on the night of the fight he is killing his body to make this weight he's clearly too big for it. I don't think Canelo power is all it's sold out to be that's likely why he is so afraid of Golovkin who he knows will beat him up, Canelo is tailor made for Golovkin slow plodding little bit of fast hands but power not so good, GGG would have a field day on him. How can Lara win when he was literally running backwards all night. He lost and handily. Floyd schooled him and he stood in the pocket and wasn't back peddling

160 has better fights for him stylistically I see ggg edging him but thats it Maybe when GGG is in his 40's as of right now? Absolutely two different skill gaps, GGG would expose him to the level Lara did BUT he'd put a hurting on him mark my word this isn't going to be close at all.