Honestly at this point this seems as reasonable as whats going on.
How the f#ck did Fury not get suspended months before the Klitschko fight happened after supposedly testing positive?
If the UKAD was helping cover this up for some reason, why aren't they covering it up now?
If Hughie tested positive why wasn't he suspended at least?
This situation seems to be one of the more sketchy PED situations all around in boxing ever.
It's very strange. Only two explanations that I can think of. The first is that Fury's team challenged the shit out of it behind the scenes, drawing out the pre-hearing process. The second is that UKAD deliberately dragged their feet for reasons unknown.
And that's only if the letter Fury received in June was notifying him of the hearing. If that was the charging letter, then it would mean that UKAD did not initiate proceedings until 15 months after the test came back positive. That, if true, is incredible.
I guaranteed you Wlad's lawyers are gearing up right now.
LOL, but this is what some cats are suggesting.
I just know a lot of **** isn't making sense to me with this PED situation. If Fury used a PED why was he allowed to fight? Why wasn't this info out til recently?
Whatever the case with Fury & a PED I think the UKAD needs to be looked into as far as how they do business. If you piss dirty you shouldn't be fighting til your situation is resolved one way or another whoever you are.
It makes no sense to me either mate.
First thing they did was claim Fury was injured and that was the reason the fight was off, no mention of the suspension for failing a drug test. They then claimed Hughie wasn't fighting because he was ill, again no mention of the suspension for a failed drug test.
Fury's injury looked genuine to me and it was also verified by doctors. As for Hughie, his illness has been known about for a long time. He took a year off for it in 2013/14 and that had nothing to do with doping accusations.
Honestly at this point this seems as reasonable as whats going on.
How the f#ck did Fury not get suspended months before the Klitschko fight happened after supposedly testing positive?
If the UKAD was helping cover this up for some reason, why aren't they covering it up now?
If Hughie tested positive why wasn't he suspended at least?
This situation seems to be one of the more sketchy PED situations all around in boxing ever.
That would be like sweeping dust under the carpet when visitors knock on the door, inviting them in, then pulling the carpet back and saying " Hey, look what I hid under here"
Lets believe the team that tried to hide the failed drug test and suspension from the public and fans. Hughie had an illness, Tyson hurt his ankle at exactly the same time they got suspended? GTFO you gullible fool.
They didn't try to hide it, numbnuts. They were only charged and suspended on June 24 and the first thing they did was start a court action themselves against UKAD. The court has already orderd UKAD to lift the suspension, so I'd say that's round one to the Furys.
Lol. This whole situation is getting out of hand. I just want this resolved one way or the other and to move on it. And LMAO at some of the conspiracy theorists here blaming the Jews and what not. I'll tell you what's going on, it's probably that damn dirty bastard Oquendo, he spiked Fury's and Browne's tests, kidnapped Chagaev and forced him to retire and probably threatened to kill Luis Ortiz's family if he fights Ustinov. Get ready for Wlad/Oquendo for all the marbles LMAO!!!
On the real, I just want a rematch. Wlad should be concerned that he fought Fury while on PED's before and more concerned that the doping agency that knew about this allowed him to.
LMFAO, ordered by a judge lol. They banned him whilst they investigated him thus why we never got the rematch. Fury will be banned in due course, he's exhausted his appeal process with the UKAD, now he's preparing his defence for the the higher authority.
Those sources you have provided are really going off of quotes of Peter Fury, a former convicted and time spent crook for gun crimes, another untrustworthy scumbag gypsy.
You're clutching at straws, just like Fluff and his high powered barrister. He's up against those pesky reptilian homosexual Jews.
Click the links and read the reports. One of them names the QC who ordered that Fury's ban be lifted. Nobody names a Queen's Council judge in a news report unless they are very sure of their facts.
According to Peter Fury he was informed of the ban 45 mins after he announced that Tyson had been injured.
Fury was never injured dummy, are you really that naive ?
You wrote that as if you had a clue what you were talking about. And as usual, you don't.
UKAD lifted the ban on Fury because they were ordered to by a High Court judge.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/boxing/1549966/tyson-fury-has-drug-ban-lifted-and-will-defend-world-heavyweight-titles-against-wladimir-klitschko/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-3722364/Tyson-Fury-cleared-face-Wladimir-Klitschko-world-title-rematch.html
LMFAO, ordered by a judge lol. They banned him whilst they investigated him thus why we never got the rematch. Fury will be banned in due course, he's exhausted his appeal process with the UKAD, now he's preparing his defence for the the higher authority.
Those sources you have provided are really going off of quotes of Peter Fury, a former convicted and time spent crook for gun crimes, another untrustworthy scumbag gypsy.
You're clutching at straws, just like Fluff and his high powered barrister. He's up against those pesky reptilian homosexual Jews.
Fury got charged on the same day he pulled out of the fight I believe. 24th June?
According to Peter Fury he was informed of the ban 45 mins after he announced that Tyson had been injured.
Povetkin had explainable amounts of a drug that could not be cycled off, Fury has unexplainable amounts of a drug which can be flushed in testing right.
These comparisons are uncomparable. You're defending a cheat, I never defended Povetkin I just hope for a quick resolution, Fury is prolonging the inevitable hence why the UKAD have passed it over to the higher authority to ban and charge him.
Ok mate, I understand where you are coming from now.
Nope. The press and the boxing world are reporting that UKAD have CHARGED Fury with PED use and that the hearing which will decide whether he is innocent or guilty has yet to be scheduled.
Only biased idiots like you are already calling him a cheat before the hearing has even happened.
Where you calling for Povetkin to be banned before his case had been investigated, btw?
Povetkin had explainable amounts of a drug that could not be cycled off, Fury has unexplainable amounts of a drug which can be flushed in testing right.
These comparisons are uncomparable. You're defending a cheat, I never defended Povetkin I just hope for a quick resolution, Fury is prolonging the inevitable hence why the UKAD have passed it over to the higher authority to ban and charge him.