Hearn wants Joshua vs Klitchko if Fury gets stripped for PEDs

He's a casual. Where's fury ?

No, genius, you said you never rated Klitschko based on having beaten nobody, yet you're all over Joshua's nuts like a rabid squirrel. That's what I was responding to. Obviously if they fight now Wlad's age has to be taken into account. I'm not at all...I've never rated klitchcko and as I said if lennox Lewis was around at the time of wladimers reign lewis would have beaten him like he did with his bigger brother...this I have no doubt ...as for joshua who knows how far he will go in terms of longevity and beating everybody....but he's certainly not a spoiler and one punch and grab fighter like klitchcko and 17 fights into his career he's not being knocked out by Corrie sanders and lamon Brewster ....I admire klitchcko for his reign and the way he has carried himself but In terms of style and boxing abilty I've never been a big fan and he was good champion in a era of very poor heavyweights...ugly style and I hope this clears it up

Stfu your bumboy joshua will go nowhere near klit, he will roll over bums for as long as he can. You are beyond belief, you just listen to the hype instead of watching and learning where fighters need to develop and making up your own opinion,. You r one dumb f***. Not even worth arguing with. Your basically sayimg a young strong fighter beats an older past his prime fighter because of youth and strength take your tongue out of joshuas a******e for one minute and think about it. Why is it so inconceivable that vlad could control the fight vs joshua?? Whos joshua fought?? What has he shown besides power?? What happens when he gets hit back?? These are all unknowns yet you choose to back an unproven fighter to beat one of the most dominant hw champs in recent history, past his best or not, i think i know who the naive idiot is here.... He's a casual.

Stfu your bumboy joshua will go nowhere near klit, he will roll over bums for as long as he can. You are beyond belief, you just listen to the hype instead of watching and learning where fighters need to develop and making up your own opinion,. You r one dumb f***. Not even worth arguing with. Your basically sayimg a young strong fighter beats an older past his prime fighter because of youth and strength take your tongue out of joshuas a******e for one minute and think about it. Why is it so inconceivable that vlad could control the fight vs joshua?? Whos joshua fought?? What has he shown besides power?? What happens when he gets hit back?? These are all unknowns yet you choose to back an unproven fighter to beat one of the most dominant hw champs in recent history, past his best or not, i think i know who the naive idiot is here.... http://replygif.net/i/95.gif

Dick head says who ? .... I doubt very much a 41 year old heavyweight who is in the twilight of his career can dictate and overcome a fighter who is physically bigger than him and stronger than him...only naive idiot would even pick a boxer who is simply fading.....no heavyweight boxer in history has kept his physical prime beyond 38.....klitchcko will have nightmares facing a boxer who he can't physically lean on and contsntly grab and hold down.....now sh1tbag when and if this fight takes place next year me and you are gonna have a serious wager on this Stfu your bumboy joshua will go nowhere near klit, he will roll over bums for as long as he can. You are beyond belief, you just listen to the hype instead of watching and learning where fighters need to develop and making up your own opinion,. You r one dumb f***. Not even worth arguing with. Your basically sayimg a young strong fighter beats an older past his prime fighter because of youth and strength take your tongue out of joshuas a******e for one minute and think about it. Why is it so inconceivable that vlad could control the fight vs joshua?? Whos joshua fought?? What has he shown besides power?? What happens when he gets hit back?? These are all unknowns yet you choose to back an unproven fighter to beat one of the most dominant hw champs in recent history, past his best or not, i think i know who the naive idiot is here....

I don't give a sh1t who or what you think....I'm saying klitchcko will be 41 years of age and really past it if they do face each other...I don't care who joshua has faced yet ....he's beaten them all and he's only getting better ....his size and power matches up well with klitchcko and there is more question marks about klitchcko than there is about joshua now to me...he is too old ? Can he pull the trigger ? Will his chin hold up against a powerful bigger opponent ? .....the better the competition of joshua the more he will up his game...good fighters will do that and you can only fight to the other fighters strengths and he's not got out of second gear ...klitchcko has had his day and will get busted up by joshua just you wait and see if they do fight No, genius, you said you never rated Klitschko based on having beaten nobody, yet you're all over Joshua's nuts like a rabid squirrel. That's what I was responding to. Obviously if they fight now Wlad's age has to be taken into account.

So now your arguing over a month lol...Jesus wept ....I don't care when Joshua fights Haye ...if it's July, August or September ..I will still take Joshua to knock Haye out ..end of discussion You will back Joshua to knock out Haye? Ok Steve, thanks for clearing that up, but that isn't going to happen. Hopefully the fight takes place October, as Hayes birthday is on the 13th, so the dates will work out nicely if Joshua takes the Parker fight on January 9th.

Bloody hell Steve, last time I'm trusting your maths as it would be October(at the latest) not September, you clown lol So now your arguing over a month lol...Jesus wept ....I don't care when Joshua fights Haye ...if it's July, August or September ..I will still take Joshua to knock Haye out ..end of discussion

Earn your points and prove to me you know boxing before you make stupid comments again other wise you won't get a reply lol... Bloody hell Steve, last time I'm trusting your maths as it would be October(at the latest) not September, you clown lol

Steve, you realise when I said "sometime next year" it means sometime next year lol and no I don't believe the Wlad fight will happen before September, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if Wlad walks away from boxing after the Fury fight. But don't worry Steve, when the Joshua v Haye fight happens we can have a big wager. Yes we can...Joshua knocks Haye out

Steve, you can't reply with one of your cheeky comments now, can you mate? "you don't know what you're talking about". Taxi for Steve plunger.. Earn your points and prove to me you know boxing before you make stupid comments again other wise you won't get a reply lol...

Excuse me lol...who said it may not take place next year ? Now I The IBF has already said that Joshua must face Parker by Jan 9th and use your pea brain of yours and count the months after that....it's September of next year at the earliest if it's Haye and there's a distinct possibility that Joshua could already have faced klitchcko by the summer of next year....start using your brain ffs...as the argument about Haye .joshau is not gonna be worried about facing Haye next year anyway , David Haye just needs to beat a decent fighter first because he's fought absolute cans .mark de mori ffs...we all saw Haye round for ha life from klitchcko and then blame it on his little pinky....GTFOH gumbo Steve, you realise when I said "sometime next year" it means sometime next year lol and no I don't believe the Wlad fight will happen before September, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if Wlad walks away from boxing after the Fury fight. But don't worry Steve, when the Joshua v Haye fight happens we can have a big wager.

Steve, you can't reply with one of your cheeky comments now, can you mate? "you don't know what you're talking about". Taxi for Steve plunger.. Excuse me lol...who said it may not take place next year ? Now I The IBF has already said that Joshua must face Parker by Jan 9th and use your pea brain of yours and count the months after that....it's September of next year at the earliest if it's Haye and the there's a distinct possibility that Joshua could already have faced klitchcko by the summer of next year....start using your brain ffs...as the argument about Haye meeting Joshua....AJ is not gonna be worried about facing Haye next year anyway , David Haye just needs to beat a decent fighter first because he's fought absolute cans..mark de mori ffs...we all saw Haye run for his life from klitchcko and then blame it on his little pinky....GTFOH gumbo ..Joshua mullers Haye if and when they meet

Did i say wlad had good footwork?? No i didnt, i said joshua would need good footwork to beat him. Nor did i ever suggest wlad was at his best, obiously not, dont be such a presumptious fool. Only an idiot like you could try and argue that wlad would not be able to control the fight against joshua Dick head says who ? .... I doubt very much a 41 year old heavyweight who is in the twilight of his career can dictate and overcome a fighter who is physically bigger than him and stronger than him...only naive idiot would even pick a boxer who is simply fading.....no heavyweight boxer in history has kept his physical prime beyond 38.....klitchcko will have nightmares facing a boxer who he can't physically lean on and contsntly grab and hold down.....now sh1tbag when and if this fight takes place next year me and you are gonna have a serious wager on this

Steve, you can't reply with one of your cheeky comments now, can you mate? "you don't know what you're talking about". Taxi for Steve plunger..

Because of the circumstances inherent in and peculiar to the promotion of major Heavyweight Championship Contests, the Heavyweight Champion shall defend his Championship within one (1) year after acquisition by him in a sanctioned contest scheduled for twelve (12) rounds against the leading available contender designated by the Championships Chairman. After compliance with his mandatory defense obligation, throughout the remaining term of a Heavyweight Champion’s reign, he shall be obligated to mandatorily defend his Championship within intervals of no more than nine (9) months against the leading available contender in the Heavyweight Division as designated by the Championships Chairman Taken from the offical IBF rules/guidelnes. Once Joshua defends his belt against Parker (which I expect to happen) according to the rules taken from IBF, he will have to face the next mandatory challenger within 9 months, which means Haye V Joshua will be happening sometime next year. And the reason Joshua is being forced to fight Parker by January is because of the following: Should the Champion lose his title in an optional defense against an opponent other than the leading available contender, the new Champion shall be required to make his mandatory title defense against the leading available contender, as designated by the Championships Chairman, within a period of nine (9) months after the acquisition. All credit to the IBF, as they stick to their rules and if someone wins the IBF HW title (when not a mandatory challenger), they have to face a mandatory challenger within a 9 month period, not a year.

Don't make it sound like klitchcko has footwork like sugar ray Leonard ..he's also quite static and robotic.....as I said klitchcko is now almost 41 and that's a age when your prime is way past you and only an idiot like you would think klitchcko is still at his best...Christ lost almost every round to fury...klitchcko is done now Did i say wlad had good footwork?? No i didnt, i said joshua would need good footwork to beat him. Nor did i ever suggest wlad was at his best, obiously not, dont be such a presumptious fool. Only an idiot like you could try and argue that wlad would not be able to control the fight against joshua

easy fight for joshua. klitschko is only good against smaller fighters who he can hold so they can't throw punches. its a pretty big tactical advantage when only one guy can throw punches in a fight. try it sometime. try fighting someone who doesn't throw punches back at you. you will prob win unless you knock yourself out fury style.

You don't know what your talking about ...Haye will will be hurt if Joshua lands on him....he's been stopped by a cruiser weight Carl Thompson and your saying Joshua will not hurt Haye...get a grip ffs You mean the fight where Haye punched himself out? That was early in his career, Haye was all over Thompson, the fight was nearly stopped, with Haye unleashing a barrage of power punches. Basically Haye punched himself out and Thompson took advantage. That defeat actually improved Haye as a fighter, and since then how many big shots has any fighter landed on Haye? He rarely gets hit.

Calm down Steve. We know Parker is the mandatory. Haye is set to be the next mandatory for the IBF belt, that is why IBF bumped him up the rankings as its just a matter of time before Haye fights in a title eliminator, surely even you understand that mate? One shot at Haye? yeah good one. Haye and Joshua will both land big shots but neither will result in a KO, but I expect once Haye hurts Joshua, Haye will use his speed/combinations to end the fight, while Haye is excellent at recovering when in danger and also Haye rarely gets hit, he's excellent at reading his opponent. You don't know what your talking about ...Haye will will be hurt if Joshua lands on him....he's been stopped by a cruiser weight Carl Thompson and your saying Joshua will not hurt Haye...get a grip ffs..hay yes is not even mandatory yet and Joshua won't have to face Haye for another year as I just said...and Haye has to fight better opposition if he wants to compete with Joshua ....Haye has to up his game