Just look how unfair Eddie Hearn is, preventing Brook v Khan!

Eddie was only willing to give Khan £5million because giving Khan more would mean he would have to take a cut I think Khan should get at least £8 million The rest of the money leftover would be split between Brook and Hearn. Its a shame Hearn turned down the fight, he is greedy beyond belief. He stood in the way of Brooks dreams.

Froch v Groves 2, had a total revenue of £22,335,000, and this was with Carl Froch getting paid £8,000,000 and George Groves getting paid £2,000,000. Carl Froch despite holding the World Titles, George Groves was the favourite to win the fight. The controversy of the first fight, meant that pretty much all of the UK casual general public knew about who Froch and Groves are. With Brook, he isn't a household name, with a little over 200,000 people in the UK staying up to win his World Title against Porter. He hasn't done much since then. The guy got stabbed and no one on the street knew or cared, and it didn't even get the media coverage. But lets forget about Kell Brook, and how well known he is for 2 minutes. Froch got paid £8 Million, which was 35.8% of the total revenue. Khan vs Brook is expected to sell just as many tickets, at a higher average ticket price of £110 vs £78. The PPV price will go up to £24.99 for the fight as opposed to £16.99, and the TV money from the US is expected to be 3x more then the Froch vs Groves 2 fight. This puts the total expected revenue of the proposed Khan v Brook fight to be around £38,700,000, including sponsorship, hospitality etc, ppv sales, tickets etc. So if we were to give Amir Khan 35.8% of the total revenue, just like Eddie Hearn paid his own fighter Carl Froch, that puts Khan's purse at £13,854,600 which translates to $19893820, so just under $20 Million Dollars. Eddie Hearn offered Team Khan $10 Million dollars, take it or leave it, when he paid his own fighter Carl Froch $11.49 Million dollars, in a fight that is expected to eclipse the Froch v Groves 2 revenue. If Eddie was to be honest with Team Khan, and tabled an offer that is fair, just like he perceived Froch v Groves 2 split to be fair, then this fight would be made in a heartbeat. Popularity of Khan v Brook v Froch v Groves based on Google Search History Sources: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing/article-2717178/Carl-Froch-vs-George-Groves-II-declared-box-office-hit-Rematch-22m-richest-fight-British-soil.html http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/kell-brook-tells-amir-khan-7227145 ^^^ is this account some odd performance art project or something? you can't be legitimately this hung up on Amir Khan right?

Hey Flatline....That Khan loss hurt aye?

Its money fight for Brook, but I prefer him to aim higher. Khan is a step down from Porter. Hope he fights a Thurman or Garcia eventually, or moves up. Welterweight is severely overrated

In the end of the day guys work for by far less and work just as dangerous jobs are we going to downplay a couple of million not being enough for someone to fight, seriously!? Whilst I agree promoters are greedy but It doesn't give fighters any more reason to be greedy too, you want the sport to carry on growing and profiting well promoters need the income a hell of a lot more than the fighters and once again stop pretending getting paid 2 to 11 million isn't enough Hearn whilst a total knob he is being fair.

Khan doesn't and never did want to fight Kell Brook. He's now confirmed he has no intention of ever fighting him. Move on.

Then why does Eddie say that Khan v Brook is a bigger fight. I agree that Khan is not the draw he once was, but if Khan v Brook is bigger like Hearn suggests, then is it Khan bringing in that revenue or Kell Brook? It's neither or. It's the two vs each other that makes the fight. Khan on his own vs any of the guys he fought prior to Canelo didn't do anywhere near what he would do vs Kell Brook, so obviously Kell Brook brings a helluva lot to the table.

Khan is not as big a draw as Froch by any stretch of the imagination so that is quite simply a ridiculous post - despite Khan getting some google hits from south asia. Khan is simply not a draw in the UK and doesn't bring anything to the table other than 3 KOs on his record. Khan/Brook is nowhere near as big as the Froch/Groves rematch. Then why does Eddie say that Khan v Brook is a bigger fight. I agree that Khan is not the draw he once was, but if Khan v Brook is bigger like Hearn suggests, then is it Khan bringing in that revenue or Kell Brook?

Khan doesn't want to lose to Brook and that's why the fight isn't happening. it's that simple.

Khan is not as big a draw as Froch by any stretch of the imagination so that is quite simply a ridiculous post - despite Khan getting some google hits from south asia. Khan is simply not a draw in the UK and doesn't bring anything to the table other than 3 KOs on his record.

Khan/Brook is nowhere near as big as the Froch/Groves rematch.