Kell Brooks is just another Brit hypejob waiting to get exposed

Brook's time to show he's a hype job was vs Porter. He didn't showed he we was a hypejob. But his resume stinks after that

I am an American and I'm not fat. Look and Lewis and Hatton today. They are FAT. I am not the least bit hurt by all the British champions. If they beat the champ then they deserve to be champ. I like Brook. The British are competitive but they aren't the new boss of anything. I think Frampton and DeGale will both lose their next fight. I think Bretzel will lose his next fight facing Joshua. Hoping "F- Defense" D.Wilder doesn't get koed AGAIN in Russia.

Lewis was exposed by Rahman Hamed was exposed by Barerra Hatton was exposed by Mayweather Khan was exposed by Garcia . U sound butthurt becuz a tiny Island in Europe is doing better than USA? I'm not even brit, but going by you're retarded logic. Brooks "exposed" Porter. Lewis "exposed" US Holyfield, Grant, Briggs, Bowe in amateurs by KO, Rahman in a rematch. Hamed "exposed" Kelley. Kahn exposed Alexander. Hatton "exposed" F@ggignaggi....

Kell has is the most protected fighter in boxing Never faced a puncher.... My sig tells you all you need to know about his punch resistance - he's hiding something A little tap from weak ass Schenko made him dance, now imagine if someone heavy handed lands on him?

I am an American and I'm not fat. Look and Lewis and Hatton today. They are FAT. I am not the least bit hurt by all the British champions. If they beat the champ then they deserve to be champ. I like Brook. The British are competitive but they aren't the new boss of anything. I think Frampton and DeGale will both lose their next fight. Sorry matey, twas just a bit of a trollish reply to the OP's ridiculous post. Americans are our closest friends.

He had pretty major issues with his hands requiring injections regularly. He didnt train properly for the Barrera fight and it was largely due to problems with his hands, it's also the reason he retired. http://www.boxingscene.com/naseem-hamed-reveals-real-reason-he-retired--21903 Naseem was/is a far bigger legend than Hatton or Khan. Agreed. But the word exposed can't really be used for them. Maybe Khan vs Prescott exposed his chin but we knew that was dodgy when Limond and Gomez were putting him over. He's still a good fighter There is something about getting beat and giving it up that adds credence to the exposed thing with Naz. But yeah, never knew about the hands. I know he fought that Spaniard after and looked a bit flat. It is one of those things though. Naz was a on a proper pedestal. Barrera definitely knocked him off it.

You can tell us Brits are doing well at boxing when these butthurt threads start appearing. Sorry my fat American friends, a new boss is in town. I am an American and I'm not fat. Look and Lewis and Hatton today. They are FAT. I am not the least bit hurt by all the British champions. If they beat the champ then they deserve to be champ. I like Brook. The British are competitive but they aren't the new boss of anything. I think Frampton and DeGale will both lose their next fight.

You can't expose a guy who don't want to get exposed. He's obsessed with Khan, who will probably say yes after five years or so.

kell brooks isnt rated very highly to begin with so its impossible for him to be exposed. he isnt a "hypejob" as OP says when hes got no hype. brits have been begging for a khan fight for the last decade because they want to see two of their big name guys go at it. Khan has avoided it like a ***** and given useless offers of 90/10. If he was fighting better guys then it would be excusable but when you fight algeri and collazo then you dont have any excuses for ducking a fight that would pay more money and that fans wanted.

Did Lennox Lewis just get called a hypejob?

Brook isn't a hypejob. He came to America and beat the champ. Lewis is general considered an all time great and yet you brand him as a hypejob. Yes he lost to two average heavyweights but those were the only losses of his career. He avenged both losses by KO and retired as champion. In the 8 years I've been on this forum this the first time I have read that Lewis was a hypejob.

I don't think Hatton or Khan were/are real top, top, top level fighters. They were never going through their careers undefeated. Hatton did beat a great fighter in Tszyu though. The only one who got exposed on that list was Naz. Because he lost and packed it in. I like him but he is a textbook flat-track bully. He had pretty major issues with his hands requiring injections regularly. He didnt train properly for the Barrera fight and it was largely due to problems with his hands, it's also the reason he retired. http://www.boxingscene.com/naseem-hamed-reveals-real-reason-he-retired--21903 Naseem was/is a far bigger legend than Hatton or Khan.

Lewis was exposed by Rahman Hamed was exposed by Barerra Hatton was exposed by Mayweather Khan was exposed by Garcia What is it with these guys being exposed as soon as they step up their level of competition? It's only a matter of time until Brooks is exposed for the hypejob that he is. Any fighter you can name who is going to expose him? Probably just like you, fans are running out of patience with this British fighter. They're asking when he is going to fight one of the top guys in the division since Porter in a lackluster performance.

Where's my apology you troll? What have i got to apologise to you for? You claimed Collazo won that fight, he didn't.

I don't think Hatton or Khan were/are real top, top, top level fighters. They were never going through their careers undefeated. Hatton did beat a great fighter in Tszyu though. The only one who got exposed on that list was Naz. Because he lost and packed it in. I like him but he is a textbook flat-track bully.

Yet Hatton was the one who dropped him? Look, it was a close fight, i'm not disputing it, but in my eyes, Hatton did enough. Collazo certainly wasn't "robbed" like 1hourRun claims. Clearly won was wrong, my apologies. Where's my apology you troll?

CLEARLY WON?! Collazo had Hatton on queer street every time he tagged him. Yet Hatton was the one who dropped him? Look, it was a close fight, i'm not disputing it, but in my eyes, Hatton did enough. Collazo certainly wasn't "robbed" like 1hourRun claims. Clearly won was wrong, my apologies.

:lol1: :lol1: Of course i watched the fight, it was a close, scrappy, rough affair but Hatton clearly won. Stay butthurt my fat American friend. BTW, boxrec uses complex algorithms to compile it's P4P list, i'll trust that over whatever a fool like you thinks is correct CLEARLY WON?! Collazo had Hatton on queer street every time he tagged him.

Coming from a guy that takes boxrecs p4p serious..I'm not surprised you never watched the fight and let me tell you this...go watch all ten of Inoue's fights before you jump on the bandwagon -- dont worry it should only take you five minutes 15 if you watch them in slow motion, you bum! :lol1: :lol1: Of course i watched the fight, it was a close, scrappy, rough affair but Hatton clearly won. Stay butthurt my fat American friend. BTW, boxrec uses complex algorithms to compile it's P4P list, i'll trust that over whatever a fool like you thinks is correct

Collazo? How strange, when i check Boxrec, it says that Hatton won? What's all that about then? http://i.imgur.com/GEChEcF.jpg Coming from a guy that takes boxrecs p4p serious..I'm not surprised you never watched the fight and let me tell you this...go watch all ten of Inoue's fights before you jump on the bandwagon -- dont worry it should only take you five minutes 15 if you watch them in slow motion, you bum!