if pistol wins i think pistol deserves a spot on the p4p list. (pistol at number 9) if crawford wins i would put him at number 3 (over golovkin)
i have stated this to people and they have a beef with crawford being ranked higher then golovkin, with a win over pistol.
your thoughts?
if pistol wins i think pistol deserves a spot on the p4p list. (pistol at number 9) if crawford wins i would put him at number 3 (over golovkin)
i have stated this to people and they have a beef with crawford being ranked higher then golovkin, with a win over pistol.
your thoughts?
Imo Crawford is the best fighter in the world. He has'nt proven it yet, but Postol would certainly be a big step in that direction. So I could easily see him in the top 5 with a win. Honestly would'nt have a problem with him being ahead of just about anyone.
If Postol wins, he would definitley hop into my top ten, but I just don't see that happening.
P4P list to me is not simply a measure of a resume. How you win matters. If Crawford wins by a SD, he'll jump a spot for me. If he dominates the fight, he'll get into the top 5. Same for Postol - if he beats Crawford via a controversial SD, he'll take Crawford's spot. If he dominates him, he'll jump into top5.
Unless Postol clinches non-stop and pulls some dirty sh1t, then screw him.
How could you not? All things equal okay but it wasn't. Size advantage and inactivity over Gamboa versus Lucas who was coming off a win over Provodnikov and did it more convincingly than anyone including Bradley and lineal 140 king Herrera. Lucas is better than anything Crawford has.
I'd say that Gamboa was harder to beat at the time that Crawford took him down. But its definitely a worthy debate. We'll see on fight night.
Would you rank that win over Matthysse as better than Crawford's win over Gamboa?
How could you not? All things equal okay but it wasn't. Size advantage and inactivity over Gamboa versus Lucas who was coming off a win over Provodnikov and did it more convincingly than anyone including Bradley and lineal 140 king Herrera. Lucas is better than anything Crawford has.
On Sevond thought I would rank Postol 5 on my list behind Ward at 4. I thought his win over Lucas was more impressive than anything Crawford has done but he did resort to a lot of clinching to get that win.
I already have Crawford at 5 and he wouldn't move up my list unless he blitz Postol. As of now I feel GGG, Kova, Ward, and Gonzales are all superior to both him and Postol.
Would you rank that win over Matthysse as better than Crawford's win over Gamboa?
I already got crawford on my list,,, and if he beats Postol, it will only reinforce his standing..
If Postol wins, especially in clear fashion, then I think he could creep on the list, at the very least he is an honorable mention.. Wins over crawford and lucas are about as good as you can get for most fighters
Crawford is already in the top 10, so how does Postol get a higher jump into the rankings with a win here?
On Sevond thought I would rank Postol 5 on my list behind Ward at 4. I thought his win over Lucas was more impressive than anything Crawford has done but he did resort to a lot of clinching to get that win.
I already have Crawford at 5 and he wouldn't move up my list unless he blitz Postol. As of now I feel GGG, Kova, Ward, and Gonzales are all superior to both him and Postol.
Crawford is already #3
Damn its getting hard to rank the top 5
Ward
Crawford
Spence
Wilder
Charlo bros
Damn, well they all great doe
I'm black and i still think you're crazy... stop makin boxing a race thing. Go see a shrink for that ****.. This is a sport. Sport needs objectivity.
If Postol wins I have him #5 over Ward, if Crawford wins I might put him #6 under Ward or maybe even #5 over Ward.
Crawford is already in the top 10, so how does Postol get a higher jump into the rankings with a win here?
crawford is gonna beat postol.
he is much more dynamic, talented, and versatile than postol.
i dont know why people are trying to downplay crawford. the man's skills are quite visible.
crawford is already in the top 10 p4p....Not everybody thinks the same way you think or shares your opinion. I have seen much of Crawford and I think he is good. I just don't think he is as good as you think he is. I think I see some weaknesses. If he beats Postol that would be his best win and a great win for him. I think Postol will beat him so we'll soon see if Crawford is the ace you claim him to be.
Who ever wins that fight will be on my top 10 pfp list but not higher than GGG. I am picking Postol to win. He is indeed a pistol.
why wouldn't you rank crawford above golovkin if he won? his resume would actually be clearly better then golovkins.