Will Kell Brook ever opt to fight Errol Spence Jr. or will he avoid him?

Looks like most people here believe he won't object to fighting Spence Jr. I guess only time will tell.

Khan's last 5 fights: Algieri Alexander Collazo Diaz Molina Wow what cloth he's made from!! Straight outta da 50s Straight up murderer's row right there :lol1::lol1::lol1:

I think they will fight when need be.

What do you think? Personally, I don't think Brook will ever consider stepping in the ring with Spence. He doesn't like fighting elite talent. Kell Brook and Deontay Wilder are both in similar positions; both guys are in the elite of their divisions and being a world champion is an important aspect to their marketing position. Kell Brook isn't going to chase a voluntary fight against Erroll Spence Jr, but he's not going to vacate the IBF 147 belt to avoid the fight.

Hamed, Hatton, and Khan. But Brook isn't from their cloth. His whole game is fighting bums until Khan decides to come home and give him a payday. The plan is to take zero risk as long as the the possibility of a Khan fight lingers out there in the nebulous future. Khan's last 5 fights: Algieri Alexander Collazo Diaz Molina Wow what cloth he's made from!! Straight outta da 50s

I agree. I can't think of a single UK "champ" that fought any americans :lol1: :lol1: :lol1: because obviously you're a bum who don't know anything about boxing

He literally fought an American to become the champ :lol1: Guess the guy didn't think that much. Also apparently missed last weekend's heavyweight showdown, Degale's win over Dirrell, Frampton's win over Avalos or Selby's win over Hunter.. smh

I agree. I can't think of a single UK "champ" that fought any americans He literally fought an American to become the champ If Spence wins the final eliminator and become mandatory he has no choice. The IBF actually abide by their own rules, if Brook doesn't face Spence whilst he's mandatory he will be stripped of the belt and that's the only bargaining tool Brook has so there's no way he vacates. Agreed

According Hearn he would fight him no problem. If he can fight Cotto, GGG or Garcia or someone like that he could fight Spence.

Let's be honest here, Brook isn't really the type to take on tough challenges. To this day his best win is a sloppy Porter who can't handle people who stay on the outside and clinch when he attempts to get inside and smother. Spence is already 26 and his best win is Algeri who many people think lost to Ruslan and got wiped by Manny. People just didn't think Amir Khan had slipped that much.... This reminds me of when Porter KO'd Paulie...

Agreed. Fury defending his titles versus bum Klitschko, Frampton defending against bum Quigg, McDonnell travelling to defending against bum Kameda (twice) and Selby going to America to beat Montiel. Classic tea drinkers always fighting bums at home.Fury was contracted to fight Klit with the rematch clause. Agree with the rest of the bums you mentioned. God forbid Frampton or Quigg fight Rigo.

All I know is you should hold it against Spence if he gets ducked by everyone at 147.....considering your past posts you'd consider him a bum for never fighting anyone.

What do you think? Personally, I don't think Brook will ever consider stepping in the ring with Spence. He doesn't like fighting elite talent. Elite talent? You mean an unproven prospect right? I dont think Brook would have a problem stepping in the ring with him. Spence should look at taking on the winner of Thurman vs Porter then we can talk about a Spence vs Brook fight

Agreed. Fury defending his titles versus bum Klitschko, Frampton defending against bum Quigg, McDonnell travelling to defending against bum Kameda (twice) and Selby going to America to beat Montiel. Classic tea drinkers always fighting bums at home. Lets not forget DeGale and his bum fights at home. Crolla has an easy defence against that bum Barroso as well. Shocking!

I don't think Brook is worried about Spence right now. I think he'd fight him unless the Khan fight was on the table. Then I think he would vacate to fight Khan, which will surely pay him far more than a Spence fight.

Brook will move up before he fights Spence. Brook and the rest of the U.K. "champs" hold the belts hostage and only fight bum mandatories and bum voluntaries. Agreed. Fury defending his titles versus bum Klitschko, Frampton defending against bum Quigg, McDonnell travelling to defending against bum Kameda (twice) and Selby going to America to beat Montiel. Classic tea drinkers always fighting bums at home.

I agree. I can't think of a single UK "champ" that fought any americans Hamed, Hatton, and Khan. But Brook isn't from their cloth. His whole game is fighting bums until Khan decides to come home and give him a payday. The plan is to take zero risk as long as the the possibility of a Khan fight lingers out there in the nebulous future.

I think so, he probably beats the still raw Spence right now.

Brook will move up before he fights Spence. Brook and the rest of the U.K. "champs" hold the belts hostage and only fight bum mandatories and bum voluntaries.

Let's be honest here, Brook isn't really the type to take on tough challenges. To this day his best win is a sloppy Porter who can't handle people who stay on the outside and clinch when he attempts to get inside and smother. Before that fight happened we weren't hearing about how sloppy Porter was.... It was all about how Porter was going to KO him. Sloppy Porter>>>>>>Uncaged Algieri>Caged Algieri. I'm not going to defend Brook's resume, it's weak and he hasn't defended his title against anyone worth a damn so far. To me Spence is coddled though, he hasn't even faced anyone with decent power yet. Brook brings power and Speed to the table, not saying Spence will be easy but if he were fighting Brook next he would going very unprepared by my reckoning. If you think Algieri is a good enough warm up for Brook then lets end the convo there. Spence just needs to win the eliminator and the fight will go down within a year, thank God the IBF title is the one in question, no step aside fees here.