Duran wants to see Pac May part 2

floyd fans defense: well the official judges had him winning that's all that matters. clean punching isn't that important. Yeah they turn a blind eye in the corrupt system that favors Vegas Golden Goose. We all know who they favor. The hometown boy.

I want to see a rematch too. This time Mayweather won't have all the unfair advantages. Even the great Duran does. Only fl0mos who's scared of their hero losing for lack of confidence in their man are the once who don't want this. Shows how worried they are for a rematch.

I want to see a rematch too. This time Mayweather won't have all the unfair advantages. Even the great Duran does. Only fl0mos who's scared of their hero losing for lack of confidence in their man are the once who don't want this. Shows how worried they are for a rematch.

Same slowmo **** you got banned the last time. obviously you just came in to trash this place. This is an interview by Duran. You know the legend who has a movie soon? well, here watch and learn.. Duran : Roberto Duran "I dont want to see Canelo vs Pacquiao, I want a Mayweather Pacquiao rematch!" Duran : I know Pacquiao wants to fight Mayweather again. He needs to keep on attacking Mayweather Duran: Pacquiao is a very intelligent fighter. I gave him an "A"

Same slowmo **** you got banned the last time.

I want to see a rematch too. This time Mayweather won't have all the unfair advantages.

Floyd landed no heavy punches and never had his opponent hurt. For a guy who thinks he's the best ever that's embarrassing. He is the The Best Ever Defensive Specialist. We don't need to see that anymore. Actually in a amatuer fights, a solid punch is equal to a pitter patter shot while in the pros a solid shot is not equal to a pitter patter shot. The thing is Pac landed more punches, including the more solid punches. There is no argument really. Pac deserved the win. # Pac lost to Vegas not Floyd

Floyd landed no heavy punches and never had his opponent hurt. For a guy who thinks he's the best ever that's embarrassing. He is the The Best Ever Defensive Specialist. We don't need to see that anymore.

floyd fans defense: well the official judges had him winning that's all that matters. clean punching isn't that important. Floyd's hugging prowess is phenomenal. I guess Pac's gonna remember the sensation of Floyd's tits rubbing his on his retirement. But, will he miss it?

Now that's just complete bullcrap! This is why you shouldn't listen to other people all the time. There's just no way Mayweather won that round. Heck, even the corners told very different stories. floyd fans defense: well the official judges had him winning that's all that matters. clean punching isn't that important.

I honestly can't believe ANYBODY gave that round to Floyd, man. It's just plain ridiculous! 5 letters VEGAS

Round 7 with punch connects in here bud. Round 6,7,8 I honestly can't believe ANYBODY gave that round to Floyd, man. It's just plain ridiculous!

Now that's just complete bullcrap! This is why you shouldn't listen to other people all the time. There's just no way Mayweather won that round. Heck, even the corners told very different stories. Round 7 with punch connects in here bud. Round 6,7,8

All three judges gave round 7 to Mayweather. Steve Farhood gave round 7 to Mayweather. Al Berstein gave round 7 to Mayweather. Let it go, homie. Now that's just complete bullcrap! This is why you shouldn't listen to other people all the time. There's just no way Mayweather won that round. Heck, even the corners told very different stories.

He lost 2 rounds in a row? Like I said, upload the video. I don't see him ever saying he was losing. I see him saying he doesn't think he is losing. My intention is not to continue going back and forth about this when it has been clarified by the source itself, and also by a professional boxer/boxing analyst during the very broadcast. Of course, you are welcome to believe what you want. Yes, he lost both the 6th and 7th round. At that point, it was truly clear he wasn't winning. Like I said, I'm not debating over what they said. I'm looking beyond that. I don't upload videos so all I can say is find somebody with the HBO version. The one I got is the one they re-aired for the Canelo-Kirkland fight.

Your problem is we have we he said, and we have him talking about what he meant. There's nothing left to say about it. I also have what he said...TWICE. The thing is, for it to come out of his mouth twice like that, it must have meant that he really did feel that Floyd was losing. The way I see it is that Sr. didn't want Floyd to get worried and that's why he changed his tone the first time. The second time he literally says that Floyd was losing because of the way he was fighting. And before you say that's like what he meant, this was right after Floyd lost two rounds in a row so obviously it wasn't just the crowd or the judges at this point.

These Pac die hard fans are more annoying than ggg haters. It's the same thing every thread and yet you guys argue against it.

Sooooo...we shouldn't take what he said? We should take what you believe he meant when he stated it? Wasn't that the whole point anyway; what he meant, not what he said?

When Floyd asked his father if he was losing, his father clearly said "No. I ain't saying that you're losing." It can't be any more clear than that, and I can point you to this dialogue for proof. I know what he said but it doesn't mean he meant it in the way you think he did.

Since morales Pac 2. That's the origin of the Manila ice ( right hook ) He knocked down morales with that one. Not to mention Bradley on the 7th. Geez man let it go. To say Pac has no right hook is just dumb. Thanks for letting me know you can't answer the question.