Ed Robinson a Sky commentator called Hearn out for this suggestion.
I think it was kidology from Hearn, the only fight they could do this with is Joshua v Haye. But it still doesn't make business sense to clash it with Fury v Klitschko.
Can't see it myself, they'll go on another date.
If its Ok for bumsquad to fight 3 gimmes in a row then why not aj? i'd say 1st defence chisora, 2nd against hughie fury and 3rd a dillon whyte part 2. yeah baby!
Who cares about Parker more like
Considering it won't be one of the big British names might as well be the guy who could well be his mandatory at the time and brings an undefeated record. Don't tell me you'd prefer to see it be Chisora or Pulev?
Parker makes perfect sense.
If Parker can get past Takam and as many people here particularly Brits feel that is an easy fight for Joshua he should make it. After all Parker will be his mando by then. It would be an all-action affair.
The way Haye was talking you can tell he's been told he's not getting near Joshua this year.
I don't know how serious Hearn was being. It would be a shame if he does go ahead with Wembley against a subpar opponent.
Because potentially it could be the biggest British boxing fight ever.
Sure but making uk fans pay for two PPV the same day. Plus what if you wanted to go to both fights