Veteran boxing promoter Bob Arum believes Filipino legend Manny Pacquiao may reconsider retirement after his final fight against Timothy Bradley, and declared on Wednesday he would "love" to see a rematch with Floyd Mayweather. Click Here To Read More]
Stop being an idiot, please.
http://assets.rappler.com/CF89D21A4A0445EF9F39956EF864A44E/img/BF47181F4F6A46CCA64C80CDCCBF8255/Corrected_May_v_Pac_scorecard__tickets-01.jpg
http://www.boxingscene.com/uploads/93941/IMG_1345.JPG
Go crawl under a rock. Don't come back.
are you sure you are not going to add anything from this before i go crawl under a rock?
The rest of the world: 2+2=4
Rath: No, 2+2=5! If you take each number apart into pieces and put all the pieces together slowly...with more emphasis placed on some pieces than on others....and if you totally ignore other pieces ...and if you actually do subtraction instead of addition.....then you can clearly see that the total comes out to be different. And if you don't it's just because you're biased.
Exactly. Its like dealing with birthers that thought Obama was born in Kenya. Anything that supports their theory they accept as true, no matter how questionable or retarded.
The rest of the world: 2+2=4
Rath: No, 2+2=5! If you take each number apart into pieces and put all the pieces together slowly...with more emphasis placed on some pieces than on others....and if you totally ignore other pieces ...and if you actually do subtraction instead of addition.....then you can clearly see that the total comes out to be different. And if you don't it's just because you're biased.
go away humans are talking, i will call you if we need genius floyd fan donkey
There has only been one scorecard released regarding this fight. If the scorecard is not authentic, you have no proof for your conspiracy theory. If it is authentic, it's already been proven that the judges scored it for Mayweather. It's over.
YOU keep bringing up the conspiracy theory. What card did you base it on? You know damn well you looked at the same scorecard that has been posted and ran with it. You don't even realize that attacking the authenticity of the scorecard means you're arguing against your own damn conspiracy theory. Now is the time for you to bow out. Frankly, I have better things to do than type the same thing over and over to someone who can't admit defeat.
If you don't believe the scorecard is authentic, just stop spamming the board with your conspiracy theory. The end.
what in the " NSAC final score card form does not have to be Floyd vs Pac fight form" don't you not understand?
i said any Official NSAC final score card form of any fight so we could use that to compare with the one that you presented,
I am sure NSAC is using the same form for every fight because the form you presented was mimeographed type form.
is your brain working properly or not?
look closely to your presented form again.
it was a photo of piece of paper that looks like a boxing score card form, on top a keyboard.
the "signatories" i hope you know what that means, does not appear on the form.
it does not even have NSAC LOGO
I'm normally very skeptical of the Boxer in a fight, and find myself some times choosing aggression over counter punching.
Jose Castillo Vs Mayweather - 7-5 for Castillo
Mayweather Vs Maidana - 6-6 draw or 7-5 Maidana
But Mayweather Vs Pacquiao, I had it easily 9-3 for Mayweather.
Pac just didn't do enough, didn't land enough, didn't follow up enough.
The rest of the world: 2+2=4
Rath: No, 2+2=5! If you take each number apart into pieces and put all the pieces together slowly...with more emphasis placed on some pieces than on others....and if you totally ignore other pieces ...and if you actually do subtraction instead of addition.....then you can clearly see that the total comes out to be different. And if you don't it's just because you're biased.
The scorecard shows that all of the judges voted the same way. If you don't believe that the scorecard is authentic, then your conspiracy theory dies right there anyway and all you are left with is the only thing there is anyway....Unanimous Decision - Mayweather.
You were proven wrong, and now you try to ditch the whole thing all together.
http://cdn.meme.am/instances/57844025.jpg
I'm done.
think about this for a second.
there were 36 individual score cards, 12 for each judge.
the person who tallied it never realizes he was tallying it for the wrong corner (which is red corner) 36 times?
your stand is weak
provide an authentic NSAC final core card form
it does not have to be Floyd vs Pac's score card form (any fight will do)just so we could have something to compare your evidence with.
does that sounds fair and logical to you?
keep that meme i might be using that later lol
Things I'd like to see:
1. My name on a Powerball check.
2. A mud wrestling match between J-Lo and Kim Kardashian.
.
.
.
1,000,000. A dog taking a dump on the street.
1,000,001. A rematch between Floyd and Pacquiao.
If the scorecard shows conflicting results, it should be cleared up.
Who can clear up the mistake?
The judges can, don't you agree? There is no reason to keep going over this with you. The truth is there, but you refuse to see it. It's really a shame that the truth hurts you this much.
http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jacobs-column-boxing-0504-20150503-column.html
there was only one judge who stood up according to you.
how is that called judges?
again
provide me with an original copy of the final score card
one with NSAC Logo and signatories on the form.
not the cheap photocopy of a mimeographed printed questionable form
that looks fake from all angles.
At this point, Rath should be treated like people that think the earth is flat or like a child that thinks Santa Claus is real.
The site benefits because numerous visitors click these threads just to see how silly guys like him, spoon23, and the rest are, same way the clicked on Junior Gong.
this post should not be taken seriously coz it is false.
this poster is a known yusaf mack and floyd supporter
he has vested interest.
therefore he is not credible.
big dunn's logic
the ganging up technique of genius floyd fans in full display
showing their propensity to use kindergarten insult if their genius logic fails
SHAME ON YOU
Writing Mayweather won unanimously was not the mistake. The judges scored it for Mayweather. It is clear if you read the article.
So you are complaining about a scorecard that has the correct winner on it. It's very simple. Accept that you are wrong and find another angle to attack from.
Just go along with the whole "I think compubox is as good as Sh*t for scoring boxing matches, but when it isn't, it is orchestrated by a Pacroach in slow moe" scenario. I mean it's an equally idiotic perception since compubox isn't used to judge a boxing match in the first place, but at least it is merely based on opinion.
why is it so hard for you to understand that the final score catd shows conflicting results?
oh, because the one that was announced was the one that favors you right.
so the other result just have to be ignored.
genius floyd fan and his logic.
What's funny is the obvious contradiction with both of his conspiracy theories. Going by those, Floyd actually won rounds 4 and 6, which were the most obvious ones to give to Manny.
He's so desperate, he can't even see that.
At this point, Rath should be treated like people that think the earth is flat or like a child that thinks Santa Claus is real.
The site benefits because numerous visitors click these threads just to see how silly guys like him, spoon23, and the rest are, same way the clicked on Junior Gong.
What's funny is the obvious contradiction with both of his conspiracy theories. Going by those, Floyd actually won rounds 4 and 6, which were the most obvious ones to give to Manny.
He's so desperate, he can't even see that.
three stooges genius floyd fans complete.
boogerman
unleaded
transvestitenies
You have the nerve to still bring this up after I curb stomped your zombie a$$ on this issue repeatedly? Really?
The judges clearly decided in favor of Mayweather. Straight from one of the judge's mouths. Read the damn article. His commentary on the fight matches his score card exactly. You contradicted yourself a billion times on this topic, but you have no legs to stand on unless you believe the judges were bought off, but if they were bought off, why did everyone in boxing not named Holyfield agree with them? Please answer that.
http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jacobs-column-boxing-0504-20150503-column.html
What's funny is the obvious contradiction with both of his conspiracy theories. Going by those, Floyd actually won rounds 4 and 6, which were the most obvious ones to give to Manny.
He's so desperate, he can't even see that.
Some might think his persistence is admirable, until you realize that he really is just incapable of comprehending anything.
you comprehension only works on things that favors your stand and stop working on those that does not.
but i can understand
that is why this:
genius floyd fans and their logic
Why do you need to know who tallied the score when one of the judges himself is telling you whom he scored the fight for? He also said he is happy the judges got the decision right. What else do you need?
http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jacobs-column-boxing-0504-20150503-column.html
why don't you want to know who made the mistake of writing mayweather won unanimously on the remark while making red corner won on the score?
Rath is like an inbred Donkey a mutant that doesnt retain anything , something really wrong up top with him .
oh here comes genius floyd fans gang of slow motioned brain posters.
upgrade your kindergarten insults.
it does not work.