Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015?

You still haven't proven how the IBF couldn't breach/redo the contract or eat the fines, which they should have, instead of stripping the guy who won the belt legitly a week later, you point was all about after the fact, I apologize though, I realize now you can't handle losing more than one debate at once. :lol1:

can't force a rematch on a mandatory. it's illegal. http://www.foxsports.com/boxing/story/ibf-strips-heavyweight-title-belt-from-tyson-fury-120915 The IBF stated that if Wlad/Fury disagreed to the mandatory defense, that the title wouldn't have been on the line, in the event that a fight contract was presented to the IBF with the rematch clause.

oh yay, the cheerleader is back! hope your pom poms didn't get dusty. one problem though bruh, what i'm saying is indisputable fact. you can't force a rematch on a mandatory challenger. it's against the rules and it's against the law. the WBA & WBO in a million years would have never forced tyson fury to agree to a rematch clause. so you're applauding someone that is 100% wrong. what does that say about you? Is it wrong, or is it illegal? Yes, the IBF should have breached the contract or voided it, it could have been stated in the terms. Things change in the boxing landscape that need to be accomodated for sometimes.

You are an absolute fool kid..... title fights, especially concerning long-standing champions, OFTEN include a rematch clause. It is to protect the champion from corruption, and from sickness/injury. You are an absolute fool kid. Do you still run around telling people that you work in the boxing industry to try and impress them? How often does it work ? :lol1: I'm done with you sh1t-for-brains ! Have fun, thinking that you are clever :lol1: http://replygif.net/i/95.gif

hahahaha congrats on being, by far, the most ignorant poster on boxingscene. and i don't even say that as an insult. you literally are completely ignorant of the rules of boxing, and worse, you consider it a badge of honor to have no idea how the sport works. you can't force a rematch on a mandatory fight. period. it's against the rules, it's against the law, and the WBA & WBO in a million years would never have forced fury to accept a rematch clause when he was the mandatory. it is strictly forbidden in boxing. what you're suggesting makes no sense whatsoever. you've said a lot of stupid ****, but this one really takes the cake. best of luck in your future endeavors. you must be a real winner. You are an absolute fool kid..... title fights, especially concerning long-standing champions, OFTEN include a rematch clause. It is to protect the champion from corruption, and from sickness/injury. You are an absolute fool kid. Do you still run around telling people that you work in the boxing industry to try and impress them? How often does it work ? :lol1: I'm done with you sh1t-for-brains ! Have fun, thinking that you are clever :lol1:

kafkod, you being a wank-stain on this thread, will not help Golovkin ;) Still running around telling people that you work inside the boxing industry ? :lol1: Have fun kid.

hahahaha congrats on being, by far, the most ignorant poster on boxingscene. and i don't even say that as an insult. you literally are completely ignorant of the rules of boxing, and worse, you consider it a badge of honor to have no idea how the sport works. you can't force a rematch on a mandatory fight. period. it's against the rules, it's against the law, and the WBA & WBO in a million years would never have forced fury to accept a rematch clause when he was the mandatory. it is strictly forbidden in boxing. what you're suggesting makes no sense whatsoever. you've said a lot of stupid ****, but this one really takes the cake. best of luck in your future endeavors. you must be a real winner. You idiot CUNT !! Klitschko would not have given Fury that fight had Tyson refused a rematch clause...... which would not have been a problem, because the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch..... as would anyone else except you and the IBF, you silly CUNT !! :lol1: :lol1: I have no doubt whatsoever that you somehow think you are clever...... ..... but you are the MOST ignorant fanboy CUNT that I have ever encountered. You absolutely REEK of dopey pacstain, and I am positive that you are kafkod..... die slowly, you silly disgraceful alt. I am done with you rules doe, you are officially a fcukwit ! You got your answer cunt, now go die slowly, and hopefully painfully.

"The WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch." You're claiming that the WBA & WBO would have allowed Klitschko to FORCE a rematch clause upon Fury?!? EXACTLY !! But I am also still claiming that you're an asshat.

IBF is an extra organization in my view http://replygif.net/i/1196.gif

silly alt clown..... rules doe, you are kafkod, aren't you ? :lol1:

when you refuse to answer a question that obliterates your position and resume the name calling . . . who do you think you're fooling exactly? you claimed klitschko wouldn't have faced fury without a rematch clause. you claimed klitschko wouldn't have vacated his titles if fury refused a rematch clause. those two things can't both be true. you refuse to explain yourself because you know that you're trapped. no amount of name calling changes any of that. checkmate. Foolio..... I have answered your question at least A DOZEN TIMES, you lying dishonest clown. But you have ignored my reply and refused to acknowledge it, at least A DOZEN TIMES, you lying dishonest clown. Here, I will answer that question again, you lying dishonest clown..... The WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch. And speaking of lying dishonest clowns..... do you still run around stating that you work within the boxing industry to try and impress people ? :lol1: :lol1:

IBF is an extra organization in my view

You're claiming that the WBA & WBO would have allowed Klitschko to FORCE a rematch clause upon Fury?!? I am claiming that you are an asshat. A loud, proud, one :lol1:

post your personal award presentations to the WBA here..... https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTfwwdyOzvwee9PiraW-6rl5xitieMh_6wUA4IjaNhxgR41HOqg well done guys !

And the winner is..... This is the official award presentation to the WBA ! They were not my pick, but they are a clear winner ! http://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server500/241f7/products/463/images/1688/Bratwurst_on_Bun_Trophy_a__07899.1356024707.358.358.jpg?c=2 Congratulations to the WBA !

I just noticed something..... The WBA won the poll, Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015? A LOT of posters who made that selection, are hardcore Golovkin fans. So, you Golovkin fans think that the Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015 is the WBA, because they have far too many champions, what with their super/regular/interim/etc..... The WBA have far too many bullsh1t titles, and bullsh1t champions. Right ? Because..... Golovkin only became the real WBA champion when he beat Daniel Geale in July 2014..... until then, Golovkin was one of the bullsh1t WBA champions mentioned above..... RIGHT ? He has since defended that title on 4 occasions. Which is not the 21 that he will need to beat Hopkins record..... RIGHT ? I will remind you all of your selection again..... The WBA have far too many bullsh1t titles, and bullsh1t champions. This post..... it may not be gold today, but it sure fkn will be real soon :lol1: :lol1: BOOKMARKED !! Come on guys, you can't have it both ways..... you can't criticize the WBA for their bullsh1t today, and then support them tomorrow just because it suits your guy.

Had Fury won without a rematch clause, he would have made a lot more for the rematch. Had Fury won without a rematch clause, he would have been able to keep the IBF title if he wanted to. You claim Klitschko would have refused to face Fury without a rematch clause. Which means that if Fury had insisted on enforcing his mandatory position without a rematch clause, Klitschko would have had to vacate two of his titles. I don't think anybody here but you believes he would have been willing to do that. Which means you are 100% wrong when you insist Fury wouldn't have gotten a title shot without a rematch clause. Fury was a DOUBLE MANDATORY. You can't force a mandatory to sign a rematch clause. Klitschko's choice would have been face Fury or vacate. My position has stayed exactly the same. You accuse me of flip flopping because you don't know how to read. Yes I still work in the industry. I'm sorry that when rules and laws are explained to you that you prefer to pretend they don't exist. Rules doe. Kid. Why are you lying kid ? The WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch. Do you still tell people that you work in the boxing industry ? :) :)

You clearly struggle with basic reading comprehension. Is English not your first language? You claimed that Klitschko would never have agreed to face Fury unless Fury agreed to a rematch clause. correct !! So, if Fury REFUSED TO AGREE TO A REMATCH CLAUSE, Klitschko's choice would have been to face Fury or vacate. Why are you having so much trouble understanding something so simple? Why would Fury possibly refuse a rematch clause kid ? He is not that stupid, he wanted the fight. You stated that the WBA/WBO would have stripped Klitschko. Now, you are trying to say that Fury would have refused a rematch ? Don't be so stupid, Fury AGREED to a rematch, so why are you attempting to insinuate that he would refuse, you dumbass? Stop flip-flopping, you dishonest clown. You stated that the the WBO/WBA would have stripped Klitschko. But anyone with a little common-sense knows that is simply not true. So, STOP LYING KID !! BTW, do you still work within the boxing industry ? :lol1: And, do " rules doe " still > common-sense :) :)

lots of insults and name calling, but you can't counter my position. mandatory challengers can't be forced to agree to a rematch clause. so, IF tyson fury did not agree to a rematch clause, klitschko's choice would be: FACE FURY OR VACATE. one or the other. yet, you claim he wouldn't have faced fury and you also claim he wouldn't have vacated. doesn't make any sense. Your posting has degraded to fanboy/child level. Any reason why that is ? STOP LYING KID !! The WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch..... and you know it !! Still telling people that you are a boxing insider to seem intelligent ? :lol1:

You claim Klitschko would not have fought Fury without a rematch clause, but also deny that Klitschko would have vacated if Fury refused the rematch clause. Those two things can't both be true. So go ahead and call me a bunch of names to try to distract from the fact that your position doesn't make any sense. Other than Loaded Wraps, you don't seem to be fooling anybody. Why are you lying kid ? Those two things obviously CAN both be true, and I have explained why on NUMEROUS occasions. Crawling up your own ass to hide, is something that little children do. Stop lying kid !! Klitschko would NOT have vacated his belts, because the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch..... just like they have on NUMEROUS other occasions..... SIMPLE!! You casual fans are clueless. And you tried to make out that you work in the industry :lol1: Come on then, Mr Boxing Insider..... tell us what you do, and who you are. You are full-of-sh1t kid, from first post to last. Stop being so dishonest you lying deceitful clown, you asked a question, and I have answered it on at least FOUR occasions..... at least have the common-decency to acknowledge that fact. Repeatedly asking a question that has already been answered on NUMEROUS occasions..... is childishly dishonest. Grow up kid..... oh, and..... STOP LYING !! :lol1: Post #223 The WBA/WBO would have deferred their mandatory for the following reasons..... reasons which have already been explained to you, on multiple occasions. Post #225 Stop lying kid..... the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch. Post #227 Stop lying kid..... the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch. Post #233 Bullsh1t kid !! 1) stop lying 2) stop putting words into Klitschko's mouth 3) stop putting words into my mouth, you dishonest clown #2 Klitschko would NOT have vacated his belts, because the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch. STOP LYING KID !!