amir khan wont fight brook 'cause no respect?

Well if you read my posts you would know I am a Kell Brook Fan, and unlike others have been so since Kell was fighting the likes of Karl Taylor, and Ernie Smith. That does not mean I cannot be objective nor am I going to just criticise because its cool on this forum to criticise certain fighters , as far as Khan goes, he is seriously flawed fighter who has probably over achieved and is coming towards the end of his career. I think you understood the point quite clearly I made a valid point you picked Collazo and stated it was a genuine test...., for some reason you seem hopelessly obsessed with Khan . It looks like you are unable to take justified criticism about your approach, blind obsession and double standards. Just leave it there, you have had some attention. Move on.

Is there actually any point to what you are posting or are you just hopelessly in love with Khan and cannot take some justified criticism of his approach to making fights? You are starting to sound like Box Office... Well if you read my posts you would know I am a Kell Brook Fan, and unlike others have been so since Kell was fighting the likes of Karl Taylor, and Ernie Smith. That does not mean I cannot be objective nor am I going to just criticise because its cool on this forum to criticise certain fighters , as far as Khan goes, he is seriously flawed fighter who has probably over achieved and is coming towards the end of his career. I think you understood the point quite clearly I made a valid point you picked Collazo and stated it was a genuine test...., for some reason you seem hopelessly obsessed with Khan . It looks like you are unable to take justified criticism about your approach, blind obsession and double standards.

I have looked at Khans record 57% of this forum picked Alexander in the pre-fight poll.... 48% including yourself picked Collazo. Both those fights were seen as legitimate challenges soon as Khan won, the same people who where picking Alexander and Collazo started labelling them bums. If Khan were to fight , Thurman, Bradley, Porter, Gurerrero, Peterson, Garcia, Brook etc. Those same fighters would also be labelled bums by these same fans I find that quite bizarre. The fact is if one picks against a fighter and he wins, then atleast be consistent and give credit when its due. Similarly the same people saying Khan is irrelevant are posting Thread after Thread and Comment after Comment concerning Khan. Khan probably gets more threads and comments then all the aforementioned fighters combined...Even more strange. Is there actually any point to what you are posting or are you just hopelessly in love with Khan and cannot take some justified criticism of his approach to making fights? You are starting to sound like Box Office...

As I stated, whatever my prediction was I got it wrong regarding Collazo. I don't think Khan is a bum, but I do believe he is nowhere near as good as he believes he is. Don't worry about trolling me, just look at Khans record since Garcia. It speaks for itself. No hard hitters, blown up lightweight and light WWs or fighters well past prime. If Khan fought Thurman, Bradley, Porter or even Guerrero I'd give him props. But he won't, and there is a reason for that. He won't risk getting KOd again because he knows his career would be over. I have looked at Khans record 57% of this forum picked Alexander in the pre-fight poll.... 48% including yourself picked Collazo. Both those fights were seen as legitimate challenges soon as Khan won, the same people who where picking Alexander and Collazo started labelling them bums. If Khan were to fight , Thurman, Bradley, Porter, Gurerrero, Peterson, Garcia, Brook etc. Those same fighters would also be labelled bums by these same fans I find that quite bizarre. The fact is if one picks against a fighter and he wins, then atleast be consistent and give credit when its due. Similarly the same people saying Khan is irrelevant are posting Thread after Thread and Comment after Comment concerning Khan. Khan probably gets more threads and comments then all the aforementioned fighters combined...Even more strange.

For the record I picked both Alexander and Collazo to beat Khan.. But I am not gonna change my tune now and call them bums. Before Khan fought Collazo you stated Collazo was a legitimate Test... Now you claim he is a busted flush, and Khan has not fought anyone creible at 147. So if Khan beats Brook then he will also be labelled a bum? and Khan will still not have fought anyone credible? Here is your prediction for Khan vs Collazo. As I stated, whatever my prediction was I got it wrong regarding Collazo. I don't think Khan is a bum, but I do believe he is nowhere near as good as he believes he is. Don't worry about trolling me, just look at Khans record since Garcia. It speaks for itself. No hard hitters, blown up lightweight and light WWs or fighters well past prime. If Khan fought Thurman, Bradley, Porter or even Guerrero I'd give him props. But he won't, and there is a reason for that. He won't risk getting KOd again because he knows his career would be over.

I remember this hahaha Khan thinks he is on Mayweather and Pacquiao level, no seriously he really does think he is a World Wide Superstar and as big of a draw as Mayweather and Pacquiao Didn't he say something like he can help Mayweather become a bigger World Wide Star lol

I used to like khan until he started to become a delusional fool khan's name isn't as big as he thinks he is pathetic acting like a diva.

This is the same convienent excuse that Ricky Hatton used to duck Junior Witter and he was applaud by some, I think its pathetic really but let's see how those same poster react here. I dont recall Hatton getting "applauded" for ducking Witter. You can't face the #1 and #2 pfp fighters in the sport in their primes then get criticized for not fighting Witter.

I picked Khan to beat both Alexander and I can remember about Collazo to be honest. I may have commented Collazo could give him some problems as it was his first fight at 147...got that wrong! Its irrelevant anyway, both are busted flushes and beating them proves absolutely nothing. For the record I picked both Alexander and Collazo to beat Khan.. But I am not gonna change my tune now and call them bums. Before Khan fought Collazo you stated Collazo was a legitimate Test... Now you claim he is a busted flush, and Khan has not fought anyone creible at 147. So if Khan beats Brook then he will also be labelled a bum? and Khan will still not have fought anyone credible? Here is your prediction for Khan vs Collazo. A genuine test for Khan. He needs to win convincingly to have any sort of shot a suckling on Floyd's golden teat. Personally in terms of achievement and ability I think that Khan and Collazo are on a pretty even level, Collazo just never gets the ridiculous hype that Khan does. Part of me wants Khan to fail, he just keeps spouting the same BS and it get tiring. Collazo, on the other hand remains humble and focused - he is my pick.

It's funny watching that he begged for a Floyd fight for 2 years, Wearing a Floyd mask , calling up Fliyd Sr bad mouthed Mayweather any chance he could but Kell doesn't get the fight because Of doing less of that then he did yeah makes sense I don't even know what's up with Lhan IT seems he's rather be a Pakastani Superstar then a boxer You're right. I have a friend who is a Muslim and is obviously aware with what goes on there and says Khan is more interested in being on TV over there with his wife than boxing.

Out of curiosity who did you pick as the winner when Khan fought Luis Collazo and Devon Alexander? Khan for a guy who is supposedly irrelevant and deluded who sure seems to get alot of threads created about him. The Same people who are saying he is deluded and irrelevant commenting on each and every thread the irony! I picked Khan to beat both Alexander and I can remember about Collazo to be honest. I may have commented Collazo could give him some problems as it was his first fight at 147...got that wrong! Its irrelevant anyway, both are busted flushes and beating them proves absolutely nothing.

Yep excactly. But watch how they would twist and turn with excuses in regards to Hatton conducts. Precisely the biggest money fight for Ricky Hatton outside of Mayweather and Pacquaio was Junior Witter. The argument they are presenting is that Ricky Hatton was too busy facing Bigger names From 2001 to 2004 whilst Junior Witter was calling out Hatton. Ricky Hatton fought such massive names as Mikhail Krovalapov, Stephen Smith, John Bailey, Jason Rowland, Tony Pep, Aldo Nazareno Rios and the list goes on and on. I am a Kell Brook fan but does that mean that I should not be fair and objective as regards my appraisal of Khan? I find the double standard quite fascinating as to how fans elevate their favorite fighters then obsessively, hypocritically and quite unfairly seek to denigrate their rivals.

For some reason known only to himself Khan has placed himself on the same level as Manny and Floyd. Despite not selling out a venue in years, last having a title in 2011 and having no real credible resume at 147. And then he complains everybody is 'ducking' him...SMH Out of curiosity who did you pick as the winner when Khan fought Luis Collazo and Devon Alexander? Khan for a guy who is supposedly irrelevant and deluded who sure seems to get alot of threads created about him. The Same people who are saying he is deluded and irrelevant commenting on each and every thread the irony!

Its not just Khan. Its many of these boxing diva's in general. Remember when Cotto caught a tantrum when Canelo called him him out in the PR newspapers? Or how Floyd claimed he wasn't going to fight Pacquiao because he didn't like Bob Arum? I don't know what's going on with this generation in boxing. The way I grew up and was raised, not liking or getting disrespected by someone should give you more incentive and desire to WANT to fight them! No? For the record, I don't think Khan is afraid of Brook. You don't desperately pursue fights with Floyd and Pacquiao with no fear yet be afraid of someone like Brook who in my opinion is a good boxer but not a dangerous fighter like a Pacquiao or Maidana. I can see why he would be anxious to get in the ring with Floyd. Floyd isn't a dangerous fighter. He's a skilled boxer who will outpoint you rather than knock you around the ring silly. To me its something personal going on between him and Brook. I just can't point my finger on it.

Khan is quickly becoming my least favorite fighter. In every new article, Khan is throwing a new tantrum. Be a man for god's sake.

another Hatton-Witter situation.....this fight will happen....if not this year, then next year for sure

So basically the Same reasons as Ricky Hatton when refused to fight Witter. Yep excactly. But watch how they would twist and turn with excuses in regards to Hatton conducts.

This is the same convienent excuse that Ricky Hatton used to duck Junior Witter and he was applaud by some, I think its pathetic really but let's see how those same poster react here.

For some reason known only to himself Khan has placed himself on the same level as Manny and Floyd. Despite not selling out a venue in years, last having a title in 2011 and having no real credible resume at 147. And then he complains everybody is 'ducking' him...SMH

Khan wanted desperately to fight mayweather because of the massive respect mayweather always gave him then I guess... whats the problem then? mayweather said he wont fight khan because he wasnt respectful, seems fair for khan to say it baout brook and on down the ladder