Wow is he really that old? I thought he was like 28 or something. He's old in boxing age and still does not have one single elite win??
That's just unheard of.
Of course you don't, I replied with facts and we don't like dealing with those in Golovkin threads.
Develop some kind of personality, Mr loooooooooool.
Sure buddy. Keep stalking...
rigondeaux's so horrible to watch at this point that i dont thtink he counts. also, unless you think lomachenko and gonzalez are both ducking him then i can't see how you'd think that.
quillin
cotto
martinez
alvarez
froch
sturm
jacobs
and others rejected a fight initially and later took it. pretty sure geale dropped a title to avoid taking him as a mandatory, IIRC. i don't give much of a **** about paper titles, so i could be mistaken on that one. don't care to boxrec it :lol1:
Lomachenko is not in his division. Rigo can fight him but he doesn't have to, it's the same as the Golovkin - Ward situation.
Gonzalez is just unrealistic, come on now, the dude's tiny.
Anyway, both Golovkin and Rigo are being avoided for the same reasons.
Getting KTFO by GGG or getting utterly schooled by Rigo just doesn't look good on your resume and it changes you as a fighter forever , Donaire and Macklin are the best examples of that.
rigondeaux's so horrible to watch at this point that i dont thtink he counts. also, unless you think lomachenko and gonzalez are both ducking him then i can't see how you'd think that.
quillin
cotto
martinez
alvarez
froch
sturm
jacobs
and others rejected a fight initially and later took it. pretty sure geale dropped a title to avoid taking him as a mandatory, IIRC. i don't give much of a **** about paper titles, so i could be mistaken on that one. don't care to boxrec it :lol1:
Not sure if he vacated a belt, but he might have. Murray and N'Dam both turned down mandatory title shots against Golovkin.
You could make a case for Rigo being more avoided.
rigondeaux's so horrible to watch at this point that i dont thtink he counts. also, unless you think lomachenko and gonzalez are both ducking him then i can't see how you'd think that.
quillin
cotto
martinez
alvarez
froch
sturm
jacobs
and others rejected a fight initially and later took it. pretty sure geale dropped a title to avoid taking him as a mandatory, IIRC. i don't give much of a **** about paper titles, so i could be mistaken on that one. don't care to boxrec it :lol1:
who is more avoided?
i do agree that his team didn't want the ward fight as much as they led on. but who is more avoided?
You could make a case for Rigo being more avoided.
I would not say most avoided man,his team has avoided fights as well
who is more avoided?
i do agree that his team didn't want the ward fight as much as they led on. but who is more avoided?
Lol. You bring up race.. wtf? Ironically you state no one is insecure. Just telling you son, Angulo beat Rosado a lot quicker...and GGG's face was messed up... my initial context is that GGG gonna get nailed by Alvarez! GGG is not the fighter he was when he fought Dirrell at the Olympics... you did watch it innit? The other main context is that Turtle GGG should be at 168 like Dirrell.
Why bring up Angulo? Rosado is the fun new topic about fighting Canelo. Trust me its all related.
And lastly GGG aint white. Guys like Saunders or Lee are white. GGG is straight Asian. Just like in the USA we call people Americans full of mixed people, Kazakhstanian phenotypes and those in Russia have Asian genetics due to general history. Don't worry son. It's all normal. :)
My God, I swear you guys have negative IQs.
What does Angulo beating Rosado quicker have to do with the topic of this thread? And what is the topic of this thread, could you please remind me?
How is Angulo related to Canelo - GGG? Does he fight like Golovkin? GGG is a face first brawler, is that what you saying?
As for the race thing, it doesn't matter GGG's not white. He could be pink and you'd still be hating and criticizing him the way you are now. He's not black, that's the issue.
But please, keep pretending to be an objective fan, you'll only make yourself look like a joke that you are.
Again... empirical facts about bouts hence criticisms of tactics and you guys get all soft. If I thought Angulo was better than GGG, even though he's 154, I would've said it long ago. Lol
Dorks. Great to see you guys so insecure.
No one is insecure, it just derails the conversation. You ghetto dwellers can't seem to comprehend that. When the conversation didn't go your way you start bringing up things that are irrelevant. It really shows your pettiness and actually illustrates your insecurity. You guys can't stand that people like a non black fighter that you throw everything at the dart board regardless of how irrelevant it is. It would be like someone bringing up that collazo knocked Ortiz out in two rounds in a thread that's about Floyd's 130 reign. It's just pathetic.
I didnt start that conversation nor do i care about it..but it is a fact Anglo did stop Rosado earlier...not that it even matters as i think Rosado is garbage anyway....and where did all the name calling and racist mess come from?? i started this thread asking a question..it got answered i agreed and moved on..
No **** it's a fact but what does it have to do with the topic? Nothing. So why keep saying it as if people don't already know that?
And what does that have to do with the topic? Are you so retarded that you dont remember what the topic is in your own thread? You racist idiots got shut down in another one of your retarded threads, so now you've begun a new conversation that is completely irrelevant. You guys are pathetic.I didnt start that conversation nor do i care about it..but it is a fact Anglo did stop Rosado earlier...not that it even matters as i think Rosado is garbage anyway....and where did all the name calling and racist mess come from?? i started this thread asking a question..it got answered i agreed and moved on..
He didnt say he was better,he said he beat Rosado better..and he did...it happens
And what does that have to do with the topic? Are you so retarded that you dont remember what the topic is in your own thread? You racist idiots got shut down in another one of your retarded threads, so now you've begun a new conversation that is completely irrelevant. You guys are pathetic.
What does that have to do with anything? Are you actually stupid enough to be suggesting that Angulo is better than golovkin? That's the only reason you and that other ghetto retard keep referencing it. If you're not suggesting that, then why keep mentioning it when it has nothing to do with the topic?
He didnt say he was better,he said he beat Rosado better..and he did...it happens