Not true.
But as I said when Khan has knocked out 20 guys in a row and in the latter stages all former champs, titleists or accepted contenders, I'll stand corrected in my belief GGG has a far more impressive résumé.
Of course you can come back to the master boxer, but is GGG any different, he clearly outfoxes, out boxes and out muscles all his opposition, thoroughly marshalling them throughout the duration of the fight whatever the class of opponent they are considered in far superior fashion to anything Amir Khan has done to any opponent he has ever faced.
In fact show me one fight where Khan has convincingly won every single round like GGG has versus the likes of Murray and Lemiuex and before ending proceedings unlike Khan has been able to versus opposition on the level of Alexander and Algieri.
Think Khan won every single round against Kotelnik, a better fighter than both Lemieux and Murray.
I actually detest Khan with every fibre of my being, while being apathetic to GGG, but facts are facts.
thus why I don't do polls on this site....they would have a hard time trying to convince someone that GGG has a better resume when they can just choose him on a poll
its a trip...Khan isn't beloved like GGG around here but the fanboyisms are reaching unforeseen levels for triple G
Anyone with a brain knows Khan has the far better resume.
I actually detest Khan with every fibre of my being, while being apathetic to GGG, but facts are facts.
:lol1::lol1::lol1: How can you say that with a straight face?
its a trip...Khan isn't beloved like GGG around here but the fanboyisms are reaching unforeseen levels for triple G
Anyone with a brain knows Khan has the far better resume.
Golovkin has like 20 straight knock outs over titleists, former titleists and contenders alike, guys previously unstopped, dude has is it 18 or 19 straight defences now ?
Who has Khan fought with the exception of Maidana and Garcia who lets be honest are comparable to Stevens the tough former light heavy tough hitter, and hard hitting Lemiuex who is usually out boxed when he steps up in class.
When have you ever seen GGG hurt let alone ktfo, bobbing around like a bowling pin. GGG has consistently fought at a higher level than Khan has this past two years than Khan has his entire career.
I'm opposed to blow hards claiming GGG to be something he clearly has not established himself as yet but it is clear and evident who has had the more impressive career to date. Tickler roams from GGG thread to GGG thread with his unparalleled tripe talk which clearly has no foundation and rests more in the world fabrication.
I find it humourous we here have a guy sounding the harp regarding James DeGale whom just struggled over Lucian Bute, the same Bute GGG handled with relative ease years ago, as well as Dirrell too .... It'll certainly be an interesting time around these GGG threads when he moves up to super mid, hopefully DeGale is still undefeated and holds a belt at that stage, one can only hope so.
:lol1::lol1::lol1: How can you say that with a straight face?
Dude seriously whenever I am reading your posts all I hear in my head is 'parp' ''parrrrrp' 'paaaaarp' it's like hearing someone making fart sounds reading your posts.
Yet you respond to the same posts twice :lol1:
Better things to do doe.
GGG's opposition has been predominantly C or D class, often bums. I will say that he deals with this level of competition in great fashion whereas Khan struggles against B level competition.
That doesn't change who has the better resume.
You have misread the question of the poll clearly.
Reply to me again when you have fully understood.
Dude seriously whenever I am reading your posts all I hear in my head is 'parp' ''parrrrrp' 'paaaaarp' it's like hearing someone making fart sounds reading your posts.
You have misread the question of the poll clearly.
Reply to me again when you have fully understood.
Taking into account who Khan has lost to and defeated and who GGG has defeated clearly to myself their is only one clear winner and it was not the guy who's only real meaningful win is over the guy who took a MD loss to Floyd.
Are we genuinely saying Khan's win over Maidana trumps anything GGG has achieved to date ? Khan was hanging on for dear life at the end, show me one fight where GGG has ever looked in considerable danger of losing a round let alone a fight ! In fact hold that thought, do not bother. I have other things to do today than talk to GGG trolls and DeGale fan boys.
Not true.
But as I said when Khan has knocked out 20 guys in a row and in the latter stages all former champs, titleists or accepted contenders, I'll stand corrected in my belief GGG has a far more impressive résumé.
Of course you can come back to the master boxer, but is GGG any different, he clearly outfoxes, out boxes and out muscles all his opposition, thoroughly marshalling them throughout the duration of the fight whatever the class of opponent they are considered in far superior fashion to anything Amir Khan has done to any opponent he has ever faced.
In fact show me one fight where Khan has convincingly won every single round like GGG has versus the likes of Murray and Lemiuex and before ending proceedings unlike Khan has been able to versus opposition on the level of Alexander and Algieri.
You have misread the question of the poll clearly.
Reply to me again when you have fully understood.
Again....the question is who has the better resume.
Not "who has the better chin".
People arguing for GGG always have to move the goalposts.
Not true.
But as I said when Khan has knocked out 20 guys in a row and in the latter stages all former champs, titleists or accepted contenders, I'll stand corrected in my belief GGG has a far more impressive résumé.
Of course you can come back to the master boxer, but is GGG any different, he clearly outfoxes, out boxes and out muscles all his opposition, thoroughly marshalling them throughout the duration of the fight whatever the class of opponent they are considered in far superior fashion to anything Amir Khan has done to any opponent he has ever faced.
In fact show me one fight where Khan has convincingly won every single round like GGG has versus the likes of Murray and Lemiuex and before ending proceedings unlike Khan has been able to versus opposition on the level of Alexander and Algieri.
Exactly. But is so irritating to see Khan waste his career away. He could easily beat Thurman, Brook, has a solid shot vs Pacquiao too. Only Porter is someone who is really wrong for him at 147. He needs to be more active.
As for GGG, he is unfortunately in a very weak division, and in order to improve his resume, needs to move up or down a 3/4 pounds from 160, to get those big fights against the big names.
All the welterweights are wasting their primes away......they need to start fighting each other...everyone was waiting on that "Money" sweepstakes but he is retired.....they need to clean up that mess, too much talent in that divison without them fighting each other
Yes I am and they're all bang average fighters.
The thread is about who has the better resume. Not who is better at KOing bums.
So by this reckoning Lemieux, Stevens, Geale, Murray and Rubio are all bums ? I must have missed the part where bums assemble winning streaks and hold titles.
Yet Khan has lost to Garcia whom was defeated by Herrera and Peterson who are world class operators right ? We could go on and on... With the likes of Peterson and Prescott what have they ever gone on to achieve on any meaningful level ?
Fact is GGG has faced heavy handed opposition and smiled at them, Khan on the other hand has been as carefully matched these past two years whilst waiting to cash 'out' whilst GGG has faced any and all comers waiting to cash 'in'.
It is absolutely indisputable IMO who has faced and defeated the tougher opposition and won by ko instead of himself being ko'd and landing in all kinds of hilarious gifs, sigs and youtube videos being ktfo, one thing you can rest assured of is GGG will never be featured in a video with David Price, moving like Bernie. For me that is the legacy of Khan.
Again....the question is who has the better resume.
Not "who has the better chin".
People arguing for GGG always have to move the goalposts.
Yes I am and they're all bang average fighters.
The thread is about who has the better resume. Not who is better at KOing bums.
Yet Khan has lost to Garcia whom was defeated by Herrera and Peterson who are world class operators right ? We could go on and on... With the likes of Peterson and Prescott what have they ever gone on to achieve on any meaningful level ?
Fact is GGG has faced heavy handed opposition and smiled at them, Khan on the other hand has been as carefully matched these past two years whilst waiting to cash 'out' whilst GGG has faced any and all comers waiting to cash 'in'.
It is absolutely indisputable IMO who has faced and defeated the tougher opposition and won by ko instead of himself being ko'd and landing in all kinds of hilarious gifs, sigs and youtube videos being ktfo, one thing you can rest assured of is GGG will never be featured in a video with David Price, moving like Bernie. For me that is the legacy of Khan.
there is no way anyone could have picked GGG unless youre a pure, unadulterated fan boy....Khan has a really good resume for all the trash he gets on this site....Lil G...its the complete opposite....huge props from his fans but his resume is lacking
Exactly. But is so irritating to see Khan waste his career away. He could easily beat Thurman, Brook, has a solid shot vs Pacquiao too. Only Porter is someone who is really wrong for him at 147. He needs to be more active.
As for GGG, he is unfortunately in a very weak division, and in order to improve his resume, needs to move up or down a 3/4 pounds from 160, to get those big fights against the big names.
there is no way anyone could have picked GGG unless youre a pure, unadulterated fan boy....Khan has a really good resume for all the trash he gets on this site....Lil G...its the complete opposite....huge props from his fans but his resume is lacking