UK Bookmakers gave Devon Alexander a better chance vs Khan, then Kell Brook! EXPOSED

OP is a ****ing tit.

Learn fractions you spaz :lol1:

I've never seen them rank british boxers so i don't even know about that but they probably put Brook as number one because Khan doesn't fight in the UK anymore. As for odds, they are made by the bookies, not a boxing org or eddie hearn.

Dude, he's trolling. From time to time he drops the act and he is actually a Brook fan. He is making fun of you if you take him seriously. Making fun of people who don't see the act. I don't think that is the trolling part of his thread, he just got the odds wrong. Epic fail - he needs to go back to school and revise his fractions.

The odds from Sky just show how much faith they have in Kell Brook to winWho cares???? Tell Khan to step up and fight

Kell Brook is the marquee fighter for Sky Sports in the UK, the equivalent of HBO before Showtime's resurgence a few years ago. Sky Sports consistently place Brook on the top of their British P4P Rankings, and have hyped the British Boxing public into believing that Kell Brook is a superskilled, slick, boxer with immense power that is going to give Amir Khan all sorts of problems. However, Sky Bet, the betting arm of Sky UK, had odds of 2/1 for Alexander to beat Khan. For those of you who don't know how odds work, a $10 bet on an Alexander win, gave you a return of $20. Now, what is really funny, is that Kell Brook, this so called 50/50 challenger vs Khan has official odds of 7/4 to beat Khan. A $10 bet on a Brook win, will give you a return of $27.50. One would think that it is Khan who is the IBF Welterweight Champion. So Sky Bet, have Khan as a clear favourite to beat Brook. So why are Sky trying to fool the British public into thinking that this fight, is an even match-up, and that Kell Brook is the best fighter active fighter in Britain? My dear friends across the Atlantic, please don't be lulled into believing that Khan v Brook is some 50/50 fight, by fellow British posters on this forum. You could say that 50% of regular boxing viewers in the UK WANT Brook to beat Khan, which is a lot different to believing that Brook will beat Khan. Both Team Khan and Team Brook want this fight, because it allows both Khan and Brook to have a mega pay-day, and allows Eddie Hearn to cash out on Brook. Sources / Evidence: http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12184/9604872/fight-night-flutters-sky-bet-analyse-the-odds-on-amir-khan-v-devon-alexander http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/11067/9783509/bookies-put-their-faith-in-amir-khan-over-kell-brook 7/4 is shorter than 2/1. That makes Brook slightly better odds than Devon.

Whats the point here??? fights are won in the ring not by bookies son The odds from Sky just show how much faith they have in Kell Brook to win

What were the odds for Khan-Prescott?

Whats the point here??? fights are won in the ring not by bookies son