Is Fury champion of the worst ever HW era?

whats worst about it? even elongated bums like wilder and dimitrenko would give them hell in the 70s and prior on pure range and strength and no you don't get to "ignore" these things or do "p4p heavyweight rankings", that defeats the point of heavyweight What kind of resume's do these guys have, though? Apparently todays HW's are so piss poor they couldn't hang with any other era.

That's not true, come off it.. Many of the rounds were inseperable. Obviously the judges gave those rounds to Fury was my first thought. And in fact, as Juggernaut has provided evidence only ONE of the judges did that, the others had it fairly even!! (The way it actually was). NEITHER guy could really get up on the other, Fury just got up some more.. He landed F/A against Wladimir really. In a REAL Wlad fight you'd be calling Fury's efforts pathetic! But because Wlad performed even MORE pathetic (as nuts would claim it based on pure punch outputs) it justifies the position you want to promote. To your uneducated eyes the rounds might have been equal. To the initiated, Fury was winning almost every round and there wasn't a single round you could solidly give to Wlad. If I'm wrong please show me the round and why Wlad won. This was a real Wlad fight, he just wasn't as good as you thought he was. The only excuse for that foolish response is you were "LACED "up when you watched it .....:puppy_dog Lol what? :lol1: Damn that was bad.

Are modern HWs really that much better?

Right, OK... :lol1: Such a masterclass, that he (and Wladimir) only connected with 20% of his punch output. Quality, masterful stuff, that. I'm not taking anything away from Fury - his tactics, footwork and switching completely befuddled Wladimir - but it was by no means a dominant, quality, one-sided fight. The Brits are losing their heads (as ever...) How was it not dominant or one sided? Klitschko barely scraped a round. Back on topic though, the worst HW era just ended, and a new one is beginning.

The only excuse for that foolish response is you were "LACED "up when you watched it .....:puppy_dog ;) :lol1:

whats worst about it? even elongated bums like wilder and dimitrenko would give them hell in the 70s and prior on pure range and strength and no you don't get to "ignore" these things or do "p4p heavyweight rankings", that defeats the point of heavyweight

:lol1: :lol1: As I said, Klitschko barely won a round. That's not true, come off it.. Many of the rounds were inseperable. Obviously the judges gave those rounds to Fury was my first thought. And in fact, as Juggernaut has provided evidence only ONE of the judges did that, the others had it fairly even!! (The way it actually was). NEITHER guy could really get up on the other, Fury just got up some more.. He landed F/A against Wladimir really. In a REAL Wlad fight you'd be calling Fury's efforts pathetic! But because Wlad performed even MORE pathetic (as nuts would claim it based on pure punch outputs) it justifies the position you want to promote.

Thats not much coming from anyone who claims Klitchko won only ONE round....not only do you lie but you cant see straight either, being klitchko won no less than 4 rounds anyone who views the fight objectively would at least give him that...The REAL scores were 115/113..as many had it outside and inside of boxing who actually know how to judge a fight fairly and accurately...this does not include you simpleton.....even Battling Nelsons scores are more realistic being it actually was a hard fight to score first hand since it wasn't DOMINATED by EITHER you fool....even Fury thought the point deduction was enough to lose :dunce: :lol1: :lol1: As I said, Klitschko barely won a round.

I'd like to congratulate Fury again, and his fans who are understandably over the moon about this. But really, this is the worst ever HW era, right? Maybe Fury's accomplishment ain't even that special. Seems he will have nothing but bums and cans to defend against. At least Fury is financially secured, good for him and his family.No way Jose. This era while not deep is clearly better than the Joe Louis era, Mike Tyson era and the mid 90's period when Foreman won the lineal title and let the all of his alphabet straps fly off his rotund waist because he was scared of losing to his various mandatory opponents.

I'd like to congratulate Fury again, and his fans who are understandably over the moon about this. But really, this is the worst ever HW era, right? Maybe Fury's accomplishment ain't even that special. Seems he will have nothing but bums and cans to defend against. At least Fury is financially secured, good for him and his family. They say this almost every time a new champion is crowned now. They once said Larry Holmes was the worst champ because of his lack of competition, said the same about Lennox, they said the same about Wlad, if Fury has a long run at HW they'll say the same until he retires.

Not at all you were just clowned stating you never said something when I posted your own quote you fool.....I was referring to straighting out the pretzel of lies you twist around frequently,maybe the pretzles aren't the thing that shouls be straightened out ..its your brain !:burnout: Damn you are beyond stupid.

When they say better nutrition, do they mean the fact that food today has hormones in them?

Yup. I'm still in shock from the defeat... but it's amusing to see all the Brits claiming it was a one-sided 'masterclass'. :lol1: Not sure it was a masterclass. But it was a 8-4 Fury type fight. He clearly won,fairly easily. Hardly touched outside of the 12th round. How is that not one sided?

Allow me to demonstrate VG.. Past era HW.. http://www.toledoblade.com/image/2008/02/20/800x_b1_cCM_z/A-legend-s-rise-fall-HBO-documentary-puts-the-spotlight-on-boxing-s-Joe-Louis.jpg And a "comparable sized" fighter today... http://www.phillyboxinghistory.com/fight_stories/stories/2012/2012_images/20120706_cunningham_0001.jpg BETTER NUTRITION! That pic doesn't tell me anything. How do we know Cunningham looks like that because of better nutrition? Maybe he just works out more than Louis did. Louis isn't exactly out of shape in that pic. It's not like he looks like a fat drunk.

Allow me to demonstrate VG.. Past era HW.. http://www.toledoblade.com/image/2008/02/20/800x_b1_cCM_z/A-legend-s-rise-fall-HBO-documentary-puts-the-spotlight-on-boxing-s-Joe-Louis.jpg And a "comparable sized" fighter today... http://www.phillyboxinghistory.com/fight_stories/stories/2012/2012_images/20120706_cunningham_0001.jpg BETTER NUTRITION! what does steve cunningham do better than joe louis? sweep the deck on a ship?

Allow me to demonstrate VG.. Past era HW.. http://www.toledoblade.com/image/2008/02/20/800x_b1_cCM_z/A-legend-s-rise-fall-HBO-documentary-puts-the-spotlight-on-boxing-s-Joe-Louis.jpg And a "comparable sized" fighter today... http://www.phillyboxinghistory.com/fight_stories/stories/2012/2012_images/20120706_cunningham_0001.jpg BETTER NUTRITION!

When comparing HWs from back then to now, someone always says that modern athletes have "better nutrition". What does that even mean? How is today's food better than past food?

This is the beginning of a new era, Wlads was the worst era ever. :dance: :lol1: I said it for the last 5 years.. As SOON as Wlad retires or there is a new Western-zone champ, SUDDENLY the era will be good again. ABSOLUTE nut bag!

Ive already found the quote where you said Wlad was dominated to the post you responded to. NUMBER 54 quote to be exact....you should work in a pretzel factory really your the best twister on this site making scott/joseph look like amatuers :rofl:...You're pretty good at it too,just not good enough with anyone who can straighten them out. Straighten what out? Honestly, I think you should get your head checked. You are talking about the use of a word. Listen to yourself, I know your worst nightmare came through on Saturday, maybe see someone about it.

Wlad's era ended, this is a new one. You can't say he's the champion of the worst era ever, because his era has barely started. There are some good fighters coming up, but looking through the top 10 it's not great. But Wilder, Fury, Joshua, Povetkin and Klitschko. Those are 5 solid fighters. Fury barely got out of 2nd gear and still played with Wlad and won 8-9 rounds on every scorecard. In reality he won 10-11. Wlad connected 4 punches a round and admitted he couldn't find the punches. Yet here you are making excuses for him he or his team aren't even making. Eh no, I responded because you said the fight was close. Which it wasn't at all. It wasn't close no. Which was reflected on the judges cards too. And even that was too close. Winning rounds doesn't mean you are dominating them ...the punch stats show this,it would be IMPOSSIBLE to say anyone diominated this fight on the statistical punches thrown ,so much they set a records for least punches thrown in a HW title fight. He dominated the fight and won clearly. Dominated the tempo, the angles, the fighting - everything. It was an easier fight for Fury than most of his other fights. As you can see here, you brought up the word "dominated" as if I'd said it. I responded saying he dominated - As in angles, tempo, distance which is all true. You think dominated meaning beating the crap out of somebody, it doesn't. First off, I said it wasn't close - You used the word dominated I didn't. Now, as I said, Fury dominated what happened in the fight and won every round. Call it what you want to call it, but he won it easy. The rounds weren't really close either. oh so this isn't your quote...."He dominated the fight " Serious question....do you intentionally lie all the time or just forget? :footinmou 'but he won it easy"...yes this was established thru the punch count,not b/c Fury DOMINATED Wlad. These were all my posts in this thread - Chronologically. Feel free to see who brought what up. Clown.