Why isn't Tim Bradley on Rings p4p rankings?

I think Bradley ought to be in the top 10 as well. Got robbed by Chaves & exposed Vargas, either of which would be one of the best wins on Kell Brook's resume (who is inexplicably #10). Losing to Pac isn't a huge loss on his stock imo.

He should be somewhere in the bottom half.. He has recent wins over marqeuz Ruslan and vargas.. A lot better than most guys.. I would have him somewhere between 7-10

My honest opion is the Ring is worried that if they put Tim Bradley on the p4p list and Brandon Rios beats him, than Rios will take a top spot and the world isnt ready for a young brown champ that dont give a fvck lol **** sounds bout right haha

beats me man but they should definitely have up there! My honest opion is the Ring is worried that if they put Tim Bradley on the p4p list and Brandon Rios beats him, than Rios will take a top spot and the world isnt ready for a young brown champ that dont give a fvck lol

I think Bradley comes up short of the top 10 pfp. Pfp is not about career resume. It's about how good a boxer is for his size right now. Today, not 2 or 3 years ago. Bradley has not been very impressive lately. He is struggling too much with ordinary boxers. A disputed draw with Chavez and getting badly hurt by Vargas don't make him look like top 10 material considering how many excellent boxers he is competing with. Pfp.is just opinion and can't be proven. In my opinion Bradley used to be a top ten pfp guy but he is not as good as he used to be an there are at least ten boxers who are better than him pfp. I can agree with you but how do you explain inactive fighters being on the p4p ranking but not justify Bradley being over them?

Surely he has a better resume and is more active than AT LEAST 4. At the least I think he deserves the #10 spot. Your thoughts? beats me man but they should definitely have up there!

I think Bradley comes up short of the top 10 pfp. Pfp is not about career resume. It's about how good a boxer is for his size right now. Today, not 2 or 3 years ago. Bradley has not been very impressive lately. He is struggling too much with ordinary boxers. A disputed draw with Chavez and getting badly hurt by Vargas don't make him look like top 10 material considering how many excellent boxers he is competing with. Pfp.is just opinion and can't be proven. In my opinion Bradley used to be a top ten pfp guy but he is not as good as he used to be an there are at least ten boxers who are better than him pfp.

He thoroughly beat a young undefeated JWW champ. I wouldnt call that nothing, he shouldve got the nod over Chavez, & losing to Pac shouldnt get you thrown off the p4p rankings, hell not getting your @$$ handed to you by Pac should get you ranked by the ring... Jessie Vargas is not a great win at all man...certainly not a p4p worthy win nor in Chaves....

But I guess Frankie Gavin and Jo Jo Dan clearly get you on the rankings. I don't think Kell Brook should be in the P4P Top 10 either. It's a subjective ranking system, I don't get why dudes get all worked up as if its some official list. Put Bradley number 1 if you feel like it, it holds about as much weight as Ring Mag's list.

His last fight was Jessie Vargas :lol1: A P4P calibre fighter should consider Jessie Vargas a "break". But I guess Frankie Gavin and Jo Jo Dan clearly get you on the rankings.

he was almost KO'd by vargas in his last fight, he hasn't looked good lately

I just recently noticed that he wasn't on the p4p list and wondered the exact same thing. No, he hasn't looked dominant in his last few fights. I think its very hard to get up for guys like Chaves, Vargas, and now Rios when you have been in the ring with hall of famers like Pacquiao and Marquez. He needs a bigger challenge. But still, other than Manny and Ward, he has the best resume of active fighters in the sport. If all around body of work is considered, he should at least be ranked 3 or 4. How does GGG, Brook, and Khan make the list and not Tim??? Yes GGG has looked dominant and very impressive, but against who??? He has never faced an opponent on the level of Marquez and Pacquiao. Hell, in all honesty, he hasn't even faced an opponent on the level of Peterson, Alexander(at his best), or Provodnikov. The p4p list by Ring used to be respectable. Now it seems they have an agenda. I agree, I think Bradley has a better resume than Brook, TC, & GGG and is way more active than Rigondeaux. & Im a Ward fan but I think he should at least fight once more to be put back on the p4p list.

Recently beat two B-level fighters, going to beat a 3rd now. If he beats Brook or wins @ 154, then move him up into Top 5 again. He takes NO breaks. His last break was Casamayor. He's been fighting world class fighters nonstop just like Floyd/Manny. He's just so unoriginal, but got so much hustle, he forced his way into P4P status. Larry, Dirk, you two are morons His last fight was Jessie Vargas :lol1: A P4P calibre fighter should consider Jessie Vargas a "break".

He hasn't looked good since Marquez.

He literally has done nothing lately He thoroughly beat a young undefeated JWW champ. I wouldnt call that nothing, he shouldve got the nod over Chavez, & losing to Pac shouldnt get you thrown off the p4p rankings, hell not getting your @$$ handed to you by Pac should get you ranked by the ring...

His best win lately was over a 40 year old Jmm I mean that Marquez did just brutalize Pacquiao. Bradley deserves to be on the list over some of the guys that are on there, the reason he isn't is because he looks like he has lost a step or 10 in his last few even when he is winning.

He deserves to be on there more than Wlad.

you think he is top 10 and they don't.

I just recently noticed that he wasn't on the p4p list and wondered the exact same thing. No, he hasn't looked dominant in his last few fights. I think its very hard to get up for guys like Chaves, Vargas, and now Rios when you have been in the ring with hall of famers like Pacquiao and Marquez. He needs a bigger challenge. But still, other than Manny and Ward, he has the best resume of active fighters in the sport. If all around body of work is considered, he should at least be ranked 3 or 4. How does GGG, Brook, and Khan make the list and not Tim??? Yes GGG has looked dominant and very impressive, but against who??? He has never faced an opponent on the level of Marquez and Pacquiao. Hell, in all honesty, he hasn't even faced an opponent on the level of Peterson, Alexander(at his best), or Provodnikov. The p4p list by Ring used to be respectable. Now it seems they have an agenda.

His best win lately was over a 40 year old Jmm