And the only reason we are fvcking with ya'll is because ya'll tried to slam Mayweather anytime he did under 1 million and acted like GGG was this HUGE STAR with out anything to back it up.NOW look at ya'll trying to use any excuse and trying to deflect more then a b1tch who got caught cheating
hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
these mayweather girls are really vindictive. :rofl:
i seriously doubt anybody but mayweather and berto got rich on mayweather - berto after their garantees were subtracted from the revenue the fight brought in.
CBS made its money on canenlo - mayweather and mayweather - pacquiao.
CBS said they structure each fight deal individually. I seriously doubt they didn't profit.
say that according to sources Mayweather-Berto only did 400k ppv buys? Did fighthype ever report numbers att all?
Why do all Floyd diehards hate GGG?
I love GGG, and Floyd can suck a d1ck for his last fight.
That's the price Floyd pays for ducking Khan 4 times, if he'd fought Khan they would have generated at least 10 million views due to the 2 rematches they would have had by now after Khan whupped his @ss easy the first time around.
#trilogy
Please look up definition of profitable. It is not the same as revenue.
You shot yourself in the foot there. 150 was supposedly the break-even for Golovkin so it made zero profit. So, Mayweather was infinitely more profitable if you want to play your semantic games.
500k was damn good considering it was a fight that was panned before it even happened. The Golovkin fight was billed as the clash of the titans and it completely laid an egg. The saddest thing is that the Mayweather fight was MORE ENTERTAINING as well as being far 3x more profitable.
It did just under 400k and not 500k and was a financial loss with Floyd's 32mil guarantee and Berto's 4mil guarantee. GGG was guaranteed 2mil and Lemieux 1.5mil. Anyone who knows any math knows which card was more profitable......
500k was damn good considering it was a fight that was panned before it even happened. The Golovkin fight was billed as the clash of the titans and it completely laid an egg. The saddest thing is that the Mayweather fight was MORE ENTERTAINING as well as being far 3x more profitable.
i seriously doubt anybody but mayweather and berto got rich on mayweather - berto after their garantees were subtracted from the revenue the fight brought in.
CBS made its money on canenlo - mayweather and mayweather - pacquiao.
500k was damn good considering it was a fight that was panned before it even happened. The Golovkin fight was billed as the clash of the titans and it completely laid an egg. The saddest thing is that the Mayweather fight was MORE ENTERTAINING as well as being far 3x more profitable.
Please look up definition of profitable. It is not the same as revenue.
500k was damn good considering it was a fight that was panned before it even happened. The Golovkin fight was billed as the clash of the titans and it completely laid an egg. The saddest thing is that the Mayweather fight was MORE ENTERTAINING as well as being far 3x more profitable.
And the only reason we are fvcking with ya'll is because ya'll tried to slam Mayweather anytime he did under 1 million and acted like GGG was this HUGE STAR with out anything to back it up.NOW look at ya'll trying to use any excuse and trying to deflect more then a b1tch who got caught cheating
say that according to sources Mayweather-Berto only did 400k ppv buys? Did fighthype ever report numbers att all?
Why do all Floyd diehards hate GGG?
I don't think so but his numbers came out on the 17th five day after the fight