The instructions to the judges will be 1 scorecard for each and another one a draw. This is the loop hole in avoiding the GGG and milking a rematch. There is no winner so no one is mandated to fight GGG aand wbc will mandate a second fight after each fighter fights a tune up first. Avoiding GGG as mandatory until 2017.
The instructions to the judges will be 1 scorecard for each and another one a draw. This is the loop hole in avoiding the GGG and milking a rematch. There is no winner so no one is mandated to fight GGG aand wbc will mandate a second fight after each fighter fights a tune up first. Avoiding GGG as mandatory until 2017.
I'm not surprised. However I think Canelo knocks Cotto out.
Why are most of the responses ignoring the fact that this guy just claimed to be privy to some highly protected information about unethical practices that would have only been revealed in some clandestine meeting? You're accepting that idea? Some dude on NSB said it so it must be legit and worthy of discussion I guess.
The instructions to the judges will be 1 scorecard for each and another one a draw. This is the loop hole in avoiding the GGG and milking a rematch. There is no winner so no one is mandated to fight GGG
If it`s a draw then Cotto remains a champion and has to fight his mandatory or vacate the title.
A rematch between those two who can complain, let them fight again If that's the case and let GGG chase Lee/Saunders or Quillin/Jacobs for that time being, I mean you can't complain GGG improves his resume even more by adding one of those four guys and then he'd get to fight Canelo/Cotto with ALL the titles on the line.
The instructions to the judges will be 1 scorecard for each and another one a draw. This is the loop hole in avoiding the GGG and milking a rematch. There is no winner so no one is mandated to fight GGG aand wbc will mandate a second fight after each fighter fights a tune up first. Avoiding GGG as mandatory until 2017.
Where have you heard this?
Sad day when boxing fans come up with loopholes for boxers to duck their mandatory.
they know that against GGG their boy Cotto will get his face pushed in.........
If their is controversy the wbc can step in and call for a rematch. All i been hearing is that GGG is mandated to fight the WINNER if the fight is a draw their is no WINNER so that means the wbc find his loophole for a rematch.
Sad day when boxing fans come up with loopholes for boxers to duck their mandatory.
Anything remotely close probably goes to Canelo. He's young and has years of bringing money in ahead of him. Cotto won't be around much longer and the powers that be know it.
might want to brush up on your boxing knowledge before running your mouth.
Should Cotto-Canelo end in a draw, Cotto retains his title and STILL has the mandatory obligation to face GGG. A draw with Canelo does nothing to change that
If their is controversy the wbc can step in and call for a rematch. All i been hearing is that GGG is mandated to fight the WINNER if the fight is a draw their is no WINNER so that means the wbc find his loophole for a rematch.
The instructions to the judges will be 1 scorecard for each and another one a draw. This is the loop hole in avoiding the GGG and milking a rematch. There is no winner so no one is mandated to fight GGG aand wbc will mandate a second fight after each fighter fights a tune up first. Avoiding GGG as mandatory until 2017.
might want to brush up on your boxing knowledge before running your mouth.
Should Cotto-Canelo end in a draw, Cotto retains his title and STILL has the mandatory obligation to face GGG. A draw with Canelo does nothing to change that