Official: Bradley VS Rios RBR Master Thread

You're so fckng annoying go kill yourself fgt. And you're a useless Canelo stan...and homophobic which suggests unintelligent...Nov 21 will be fun

A win over Marquez at 40 and it was close.. I like Brook and I think he's in top 3 welters at this point, along with Pacquiao and Bradley, for exemple I rate him better than Thurman, but he hasn't fought the top level opponents yet. Porter win was nice and it showed he has the A level potential (that he has to prove yet against the top opponents) and Porter is a great guy that I like but he's still a B level fighter at best. Talking about Bradley his win against Marquez was pretty convincing, I had it 8-4 for him, plus it showed he can beat a lot of good fighters only if he choses to respect the fight plan instead of swinging mindlessly.

That not what I said...ugh try pay attention when you read I said I don't put too much value on the Pacquiao performances, not Bradley himself who is a top WW and great fighter. But overhyped to justify hype on Manny. Both Thurman and Brook hurt Bradley bad....Holt did, Provodnikov did, Vargas did....They would You're so fckng annoying go kill yourself fgt.

WTF the way Bradley was criticised for years for always working with his head and smothering himself.....wow you guys really don't follow boxing do you? Not nearly as bad as Porter. Bradley does everything better than Porter. It's not even worth going back and forth.

That not what I said...ugh try pay attention when you read I said I don't put too much value on the Pacquiao performances, not Bradley himself who is a top WW and great fighter. But overhyped to justify hype on Manny. Both Thurman and Brook hurt Bradley bad....Holt did, Provodnikov did, Vargas did....They would Huh, ok. Just woke up. Here's the thing. If Thurman or Brook were to fight/beat Bradley then they would be considered the man. It doesn't work in a scenario where Bradley is not involved though. (Not with one fight anyway) Like I said earlier, Bradley just doesn't pass the eye test to most people. Thurman and Brook do. Hell, even to me they do. But Like it or not Bradley is the most proven at WW, at the highest level right now. Also, and I hate to use this as an argument, but he's the highest paid WW right now. (Not sure what Brook makes on PPV though) so that all says something. BTW, I'm not hyping him because of manny. But since you keep bringing it up. If your saying he lost to him both times then TB should have had a UD against Marquez and Chaves.

youre a joke. You "think" Brook will knock Bradley out so you don't see much value in him. :lol1: Brook is 3-0 in title fights against the likes of Porter, jo jo Dan, and Frankie freaking Gavin. That's a real murderers row there... Bradley is 12-1 in title fights against top competition. Just because Bradley doesn't pass your "eye" test doesn't mean sh*t. He a proven champion. Brook isn't, period. Get over it. That not what I said...ugh try pay attention when you read I said I don't put too much value on the Pacquiao performances, not Bradley himself who is a top WW and great fighter. But overhyped to justify hype on Manny. Both Thurman and Brook hurt Bradley bad....Holt did, Provodnikov did, Vargas did....They would

And Ali lost to Joe Fraziers sparring partner....so what Porter beat Alexander better than Bradley did albeit a while ago now... Gave Brook a good fight..decimated Paulie, Made Broner who just beat a very good fighter look terrible.. Bradley has two losses to Manny, A win over Marquez at 40 and it was close....What else? Abregu? Who Sadam Ali stopped? Vargas who nearly knocked him out? Bull**** Lets talk facts here, Bradley is great because his supposed performances against Manny, but I think Brook would Knock both out so don't see much Value in it .... youre a joke. You "think" Brook will knock Bradley out so you don't see much value in him. :lol1: Brook is 3-0 in title fights against the likes of Porter, jo jo Dan, and Frankie freaking Gavin. That's a real murderers row there... Bradley is 12-1 in title fights against top competition. Just because Bradley doesn't pass your "eye" test doesn't mean sh*t. He a proven champion. Brook isn't, period. Get over it.

The fact that Bradley is being compared to Porter proved how underrated and disrespected he is. Porter can't even work without smothering himself. WTF the way Bradley was criticised for years for always working with his head and smothering himself.....wow you guys really don't follow boxing do you?

Porter lost (but got a draw) to Bradley's sparring partner Julio freakin Diaz :lol1: And Ali lost to Joe Fraziers sparring partner....so what Porter beat Alexander better than Bradley did albeit a while ago now... Gave Brook a good fight..decimated Paulie, Made Broner who just beat a very good fighter look terrible.. Bradley has two losses to Manny, A win over Marquez at 40 and it was close....What else? Abregu? Who Sadam Ali stopped? Vargas who nearly knocked him out? Bull**** Lets talk facts here, Bradley is great because his supposed performances against Manny, but I think Brook would Knock both out so don't see much Value in it ....

Porter lost (but got a draw) to Bradley's sparring partner Julio freakin Diaz :lol1:

The fact that Bradley is being compared to Porter proved how underrated and disrespected he is. Porter can't even work without smothering himself.

Exactly, I'd say they are about the same, Porter hitting a little harder and a little cruder while Bradley has better boxing ability. Think Brook is a step above both. Thurman....maybe Lol wtf. They have a similar style but Tim has one of th best resumes today

Bullsh*t. Porter has not proven to be on the same level as Bradley and neither has Brook. It's all hope, tough talk and speculation. Neither have consistently fought world class opposition like Bradley has. I say make these fights happen so Tim can shut these dudes down like a BOSS. :boxing:

Exactly, I'd say they are about the same, Porter hitting a little harder and a little cruder while Bradley has better boxing ability. Think Brook is a step above both. Thurman....maybe Bullsh*t. Porter has not proven to be on the same level as Bradley and neither has Brook. It's all hope, tough talk and speculation. Neither have consistently fought world class opposition like Bradley has.

I'm Bradley's new biggest fan.

Who has porter beat again?? I'll wait... Exactly, I'd say they are about the same, Porter hitting a little harder and a little cruder while Bradley has better boxing ability. Think Brook is a step above both. Thurman....maybe

Bradley looked really good. Used a lot of angles and got in and out. When Rios tried to impose himself on Bradley he went toe to toe with him and whipped him on the inside. He doesn't throw them arm punches any more either. Rios wasn't prepared and fat but Bradley impressed either way. When he threw those 4 hooks in a row and kept stepping to the side to get out of harms way, turning Rios. I've never seen Bradley do that

who has Bradley beaten again? I'll wait for all the great fighters you will name and then point out that Porter is better than them all... Who has porter beat again?? I'll wait...

brandon lookt like shiet...bradley lookt good but its hard to tell how well he really performed because brandon was so far gone.

who has Bradley beaten again? I'll wait for all the great fighters you will name and then point out that Porter is better than them all... Porter isn't better than Marquez, not Marquez coming off the Pacquiao KO hype.