The next time you have the nerve to call a fighter "scared", a p*ssy or a b*tch....

Wait isn't the TS one who rides Ortiz for quitting?

Fighting in the ring with a ref and doctor to protect you isn't hard. Try fighting in the streets where you can get shot or stabbed. btw, floyds a puzzy.

Stupid thread. Clear endorsement to easy fights and mismatches. Switch to tennis doe. Or golf. A GGG fanboy complaining about easy fights and mismatches? Looooooooooool.

no what Im sayin no what Im sayin no what Im sayin etc etc. even GGG busting this guys face apart still could not shut him up

That would be considered surrendering, and saving thousands of women from being raped, and children as well. If an army decides not to fight, maybe it is because they are outnumbered, outgunned, and they risk too many lives. War is a lot different than boxing though, in the medieval times there were 1 on 1's just for entertainment too, though I imagine more brutal, like deaths. If someone decided they didn't want to fight another particular knight out of fear of death, I don't think they would be considered a coward. I think you're understood my analogy. If 90 warriors were ready to war with the enemy and 10 weren't they would be considered cowards and probably executed. You can't just choose to be a warrior because of the fame and glory it brings but when it time for war puss out. And that pretty much what some of these guys are doing. They like the attention of being a boxer but rather pick on the weaklings. If you fight a guy on the level of Fernando Guerreroe and no problem beating up on him but soon as a real challenge comes you're no where to be found. Being a coward isn't the worst thing to be but there are boxers out there who are scared of others fighters.

Yea OP but does the same rules go for actual fighters like Mayorga talking about Floyds ****** style

Honestly if your were a warrior during the medieval time and just decided you didn't want to go to war with a certain army wouldn't you be considered a coward. If you choose not to fighting certain fighters because you're scared you might get hurt, than by definition you're a coward. Sorry but Rosado is wrong on this one. That would be considered surrendering, and saving thousands of women from being raped, and children as well. If an army decides not to fight, maybe it is because they are outnumbered, outgunned, and they risk too many lives. War is a lot different than boxing though, in the medieval times there were 1 on 1's just for entertainment too, though I imagine more brutal, like deaths. If someone decided they didn't want to fight another particular knight out of fear of death, I don't think they would be considered a coward.

Anyone that calls a guy who fights for a living a coward, world class no less, is obviously a complete moron. Obviously fighters duck fighters and avoid certain risks at times and have done throughout the sport I.e Amir Khan ducking Kell Brook at the moment but that doesn't make him a coward. This guy can die at any time during both training and obviously his fights, forr OUR entertainment. Those men aren't cowards. I'd like to see anyone who isn't a fighter try and survive one training camp that these guys go through. dude get off it. If they fought for us they wouldnt avoid each other and make outrageous demands. A guy on a construction site can fall off a scaffold, get crushed by machinery etc. and he does that for middle class wages. Spare me that these guys are martyrs. They made a choice to do this for their life, not ours. They don't like it they can always do something. You guys on here are legit groupies, acting like we're supposed to worship these guys because they fight for a living or be so grateful that they grace our t.v screens.

Are we allowed to say Riddick Bowe was scared?

I'm still not going to stop calling Peter Quillin a scared p*ssy, because that dude is a scared p*ssy. You tell 'em, tough guy.

good **** man i remember seeing him having a fight back in the late or early 00's man he could not talk at all great fighter great champion The Kid! :boxing: :boxing:

:dunce: Yes, because prize fighters and medieval warriors are analogous. If you choose to be a knight you couldn't just pick and choose when you fought. Same thing for being a boxer. I mean being a coward isn't the worst thing in life. If you want to bath in the fame and glory of being a boxer than you can't get made when the fans calls you out on your bull****. If your in this sport just to make money to feed your family and what not that's fine. And of course I'm talking about the everyday men who work full time jobs and only do it for spare change. But when you're a top rated fighter and choose to go after champioships. and rankings you fight the best, anything else is an example of cowardice. And of course there's standards, like you can't be considered a coward because you choose not to fight someone in another division.

Honestly if your were a warrior during the medieval time and just decided you didn't want to go to war with a certain army wouldn't you be considered a coward. If you choose not to fighting certain fighters because you're scared you might get hurt, than by definition you're a coward. Sorry but Rosado is wrong on this one. :dunce: Yes, because prize fighters and medieval warriors are analogous.

Honestly if your were a warrior during the medieval time and just decided you didn't want to go to war with a certain army wouldn't you be considered a coward. If you choose not to fighting certain fighters because you're scared you might get hurt, than by definition you're a coward. Sorry but Rosado is wrong on this one.

GTFO off your moral pedestal, idiot. It's all the same *****. You're exactly what I'm talking about. It has nothing to do with morals. It has everything to do with common sense and intelligence which are two things you clearly lack.

It's a different context though. Not many are going to call a boxer a pu$$y on the street, but in the realm of boxing, a fighting sport where bravery and courage should be valued, when fighters duck other fighters for years (like Floyd ducking Khan for example) it's fine to call them a pu$$y. You don't mean they are actually a real-life pu$$y, you just means they are a pu$$y within the context of boxing.

Stupid thread. Clear endorsement to easy fights and mismatches. Switch to tennis doe. Or golf. Or Cricket, for those across the pond

Stupid thread. Clear endorsement to easy fights and mismatches. Switch to tennis doe. Or golf.

You're a perfect example of the idiots he was talking about. Just plain stupid. GTFO off your moral pedestal, idiot. It's all the same *****. You're exactly what I'm talking about.

If they're scared, p*ssies, quitters or whatever else I will still call them so... whether they fight or not, they still are what they are.