Khans resume ****s all over Thurman resume. Thurman has been fighting bums after bums except the Guerrero fight. This guy hasn't beaten a prime fighter or even been in the ring with them. Just like Paulie said "there's always levels in boxing Of course your gonna look good fight a dishwasher". Thurman is no where near khans class until he proves otherwise. Talk is cheap
Damn these guys who loved Khan all turned on him and dog him in every thread as soon as Brook got 1 good win
This forum is the gay
:lol1:
Khan is basically the biggest laughingstock in all of boxing right now. Nobody but a tiny minority of irrational fanboys support or even like him anymore.
khan's been a laughingstock for years. he's always been his deluded self and an annoying figure in the sport. that didn't stop his former super fans before though.
so what changed? here's my theory: kelly brook's "dishness" stole the hearts of khan's army. they've always strayed a little gay i thought. khan fans = twilight fans
:burnout:
neither guy has set the world alight at welterweight, but i'd take mayweather's leftovers (guerrero) over porter's leftovers (alexander), and at least thurman beat two guys on good form in chaves and bundu. also, until thurman fights collazo, their only common opponent at welterweight is julio diaz, who wobbled khan and took him the distance whereas against thurman he couldn't even make it to the third round.
And just a few months before that, he fought Bundu, a guy with 11 KO's in 30 odd fights.... and couldn't even hurt him.... lol. Thurman is over-rated.
Ehm, except that he put him down in the first round? :lol1:
Khan fought someone in his last fight with less than 11 KOs and couldn't hurt him either! In fact, he was buckled by him in the first round.
Khanturds...
Yeah that sounds like a Khan move! Maybe Andre Berto, Robert Guerrero or Adrien Broner
He wouldn't fight any of those guys.
I'm telling you now, he'd fight Lamont Peterson next if he doesn't get Mayweather.
Thurman last fought Guerrero and proved himself with a good display,whereas Khan fought kickboxer Algieri,Khan always living in the last.
And just a few months before that, he fought Bundu, a guy with 11 KO's in 30 odd fights.... and couldn't even hurt him.... lol. Thurman is over-rated.
Khans resume ****s all over Thurman resume. Thurman has been fighting bums after bums except the Guerrero fight. This guy hasn't beaten a prime fighter or even been in the ring with them. Just like Paulie said "there's always levels in boxing Of course your gonna look good fight a dishwasher". Thurman is no where near khans class until he proves otherwise. Talk is cheap
Thurman last fought Guerrero and proved himself with a good display,whereas Khan fought kickboxer Algieri,Khan always living in the last.
Interesting?
Let me tell you who it'll be: Rematch with Lamont Peterson.
Yeah that sounds like a Khan move! Maybe Andre Berto, Robert Guerrero or Adrien Broner
Carl Froch is a legitimate 3 time world champion and it was in one of the strongest divisions at the time. He lost in the Super Six Final so how could he be 4th in the division? :pat:
Anyway we know Khantards hate Froch so that explains your retarded comments and now trying to deflect to Thurman :lol1:
No one in boxing right now is a bigger liar and hypocrite than Amir Khan.
He lost to a faded one eyed Kessler who was coming off a bad loss to Ward in the super 6.
He also got a disgrace full gift against Dirrell unless you count rabbit punches and shots well after a break is called as scoring shots.
Every title he won was vacant apart from the ibf one, unless you count the "Regular" belt he got for barely beating a shot to **** Kessler.
Thurman said Khan needs to fight real welters yet fought Diaz and the Ghost is that not hypocritical?
Depends on how well you rate him though this may be blasphemous on here but in reality Carl was a paper champion in historically the weakest division in the history of boxing.
After the super 6 he was the 3rd or 4th best fighter in the division depending on your view of the Dirrell fight and talks like he is an ATG which I find cringe.
Khan has always been full of **** like most boxers are in fact just look at Thurmans recent antics.
Carl Froch is a legitimate 3 time world champion and it was in one of the strongest divisions at the time. He lost in the Super Six Final so how could he be 4th in the division? :pat:
Anyway we know Khantards hate Froch so that explains your retarded comments and now trying to deflect to Thurman :lol1:
No one in boxing right now is a bigger liar and hypocrite than Amir Khan.
Can't you watch the video?
He said that he was looking at Senchenko as a possible opponent and then when Kell Brook beat Senchenko, he said that Senchenko was finished and that Hatton was beating him up before he got stopped :lol1:
Carl Froch actually talks sense most of the time. Khan is a complete hypocrite and liar.
Depends on how well you rate him though this may be blasphemous on here but in reality Carl was a paper champion in historically the weakest division in the history of boxing.
After the super 6 he was the 3rd or 4th best fighter in the division depending on your view of the Dirrell fight and talks like he is an ATG which I find cringe.
Khan has always been full of **** like most boxers are in fact just look at Thurmans recent antics.
What did he actually say? I find Khan cringe and not funny similar to Carl Froch in that respect.
Can't you watch the video?
He said that he was looking at Senchenko as a possible opponent and then when Kell Brook beat Senchenko, he said that Senchenko was finished and that Hatton was beating him up before he got stopped :lol1:
Carl Froch actually talks sense most of the time. Khan is a complete hypocrite and liar.
Skip to 1.20 for the appropriate bit but watch the whole thing if you want a real laugh :lol1:
What did he actually say? I find Khan cringe and not funny similar to Carl Froch in that respect.