Thurman, Khan, Brook, who fought the best comp

limiting it to last 3 fights is stupid as hell and there is only 7 pounds difference between 140/147. hatton moved up from 140 to fight floyd at 147 didnt he? so did he have 0 credibility? does floyd win over him mean nothing because hatton hadnt fought at 147 before? who the fvck did duran fight at 147 before he beat leonard? u guys put way too much emphasis on 7 pounds

Kell has the best single win but Dan and Gavin are also the worst of the bunch. Khan has decent wins but none were punchers or real threats Thurman's last 3 have been pretty poor. Bundu is a bit better than Gavin while I've never really rated Guerrero.

Kell Brook is so over-rated in here.

khans win are most impressive algeiri beat provodnikov and fought pacquiao,alexander (3 time world champ) beat maidana with ease,collazo(i dont rate that win that highly but hes facing thurman and is better then brooks last 2 opponents.) Its khan,thurman,then brook for me. I rate kell for that porter win but hes been fighting bums recently.

Thurman's win over Chaves is pretty good. Stopped Chaves when he was undefeated and Chaves gave Bradley a rough fight and was beating Rios before he got himself DQ'd for some reason. Bundu was a top level amateur and he did stop Julio Diaz. As far as Welterweight, Khan's win over Alexander was impressive but its hard to rate the Algieri win because I think Algieri is a little underrated on here. Algieri beat Taylor a lot easier than Broner did. He was still getting caught by Diaz's left hook although pulling out the victory. Brook probably has the most impressive win because he handled Porter with relative ease and Porter beat beat Alexander, Broner, and Julio Diaz. There's nothing probable about that.

Well Khan has only had 3 welterweight fights, it would be unfair to mention others. Ah, my bad. Missed the part about WW.

Thurman's win over Chaves is pretty good. Stopped Chaves when he was undefeated and Chaves gave Bradley a rough fight and was beating Rios before he got himself DQ'd for some reason. Bundu was a top level amateur and he did stop Julio Diaz. As far as Welterweight, Khan's win over Alexander was impressive but its hard to rate the Algieri win because I think Algieri is a little underrated on here. Algieri beat Taylor a lot easier than Broner did. He was still getting caught by Diaz's left hook although pulling out the victory. Brook probably has the most impressive win because he handled Porter with relative ease and Porter beat beat Alexander, Broner, and Julio Diaz.

OP limits the comparison to their last 3 opponents & asks who fought the best opponents? WTF is this :lol1: ? Well Khan has only had 3 welterweight fights, it would be unfair to mention others.

OP limits the comparison to their last 3 opponents & asks who fought the best opponents? WTF is this :lol1: ?

Tim Bradley... he deserves it more than all 3 of them... however controversial, he has a w over Pac... non of these 3 have anything like that

Brook wins in my opinion. His win over Porter is the best win of all and looking better than ever after Porter's wins over Paulie and Broner. Collazo is no where near as good as Rios. Rios is a top 10 guy still dangerous and in his prime. Collazo is ranked about 40th and he is washed up and no threat at all to Thurman who should be ashamed to call fighting Collazo a title defense :lol1::lol1::lol1:

You should consider taking a look at their last 15 opponents. No doubt khan has the best overall resume, but at WW they are all pretty much even. I rather khan get the fight than the other two.

Brook obviously. He beat the guy who beat Khan's best win at welterweight. As for the fluff around each of their best wins.. meh

Porter is the best win of the nine, so Brook.

Khan easy Algeiri Alexander Collazo Diaz Maidana Malanagi Kontelnik Judah Barrera McCloskey

In their last three fights. Since khan moved up to WW he fought 3 times. Amir Khan - Collazo, Alexander, Algieri Keith Thurman - Julio Diaz, Leanard Bundu, Robert Guerrero Kell Brook - Shawn Porter, Jo Jo Dan, Frankie Gavin Honestly all of their resumes dont look good. The best single win was Brook over Porter followed by Khan over Alexander and then Thurman over Guerrero. Non of them really have an advantage over the other. Also Thurman is fighting Collazo next and Brook most likely will fight Rios, neither fight is any better. You should consider taking a look at their last 15 opponents.

Brook wins in my opinion. His win over Porter is the best win of all and looking better than ever after Porter's wins over Paulie and Broner. Collazo is no where near as good as Rios. Rios is a top 10 guy still dangerous and in his prime. Collazo is ranked about 40th and he is washed up and no threat at all to Thurman who should be ashamed to call fighting Collazo a title defense Kinda gotta agree with this... None are great resumes, but the Porter win is the best between all of them

Brook wins in my opinion. His win over Porter is the best win of all and looking better than ever after Porter's wins over Paulie and Broner. Collazo is no where near as good as Rios. Rios is a top 10 guy still dangerous and in his prime. Collazo is ranked about 40th and he is washed up and no threat at all to Thurman who should be ashamed to call fighting Collazo a title defense