USADA should be investigated ! ! !

This thread is just so hilarious.

Having an argument with Rath is like having a conversation with a chimpanzee. You sense there might be hints of human intelligence in him, but what comes out of him is pure gibberish who's stupid then? you arguing with a chimpanzee and losing or the chimpanzee arguing with you and winning? LOL

Again, you have no idea why the crowd booed. Yes, he did have 2 exciting moments in the 4th and 6 th rounds, which is why I gave him those rounds. The other 10 he did virtually nothing, which is why he lost 90-100% of them on virtually every credible scorecard. There is no denying Manny lost. He just isn't as good as Floyd, never was, never will be. The judges got the score right, maybe even gave Manny 1 more round than he actually deserved. You mean the biased judges that were hand selected by the NSAC, and the biased ref that gave Fraud several warnings without deducting a single point? Let's not forget the biased CompuBox system that counted missed punches for Fraud. http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/5-22-2015/Jtqcdn.gif That right hand from Fraud clearly missed but CompuBox still counted it. :rofl:

Again, you have no idea why the crowd booed. Yes, he did have 2 exciting moments in the 4th and 6 th rounds, which is why I gave him those rounds. The other 10 he did virtually nothing, which is why he lost 90-100% of them on virtually every credible scorecard. There is no denying Manny lost. He just isn't as good as Floyd, never was, never will be. The judges got the score right, maybe even gave Manny 1 more round than he actually deserved. You mean the biased judges that were hand selected by the NSAC, and the biased ref that gave Fraud several warnings without deducting a single point? Let's not forget the biased CompuBox system that counted missed punches for Fraud. http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/5-22-2015/Jtqcdn.gif That right hand from Fraud clearly missed but CompuBox still counted it. :rofl:

They were booing Fraud's underhanded tactics; e.g., excessive clinching, constant backpeddling, ducking below the waistline, headlocks and low blows. The most exciting moments in the fight belonged to Pacquiao, he had the audience out of their seats when he hurt Fraud in rounds 4 and 6. And for the record, I'm not denying the fact that Pacquiao lost, and that Fraud was given the decision by the NSAC. :lol1: Again, you have no idea why the crowd booed. Yes, he did have 2 exciting moments in the 4th and 6 th rounds, which is why I gave him those rounds. The other 10 he did virtually nothing, which is why he lost 90-100% of them on virtually every credible scorecard. There is no denying Manny lost. He just isn't as good as Floyd, never was, never will be. The judges got the score right, maybe even gave Manny 1 more round than he actually deserved.

You have no idea why fans were booing. My guess, they booed Manny's non effort. Doesn't really matter, the better man won. The only people still complaining are Manny fans that can't or won't admit Manny lost. Go to Vegas and tell the bookies you thought Manny won and see if they pay you. They were booing Fraud's underhanded tactics; e.g., excessive clinching, constant backpeddling, ducking below the waistline, headlocks and low blows. The most exciting moments in the fight belonged to Pacquiao, he had the audience out of their seats when he hurt Fraud in rounds 4 and 6. And for the record, I'm not denying the fact that Pacquiao lost, and that Fraud was given the decision by the NSAC. :lol1:

see, now would be the perfect time to demand video evidence, official bank statements w-2's. :haha: :haha:

The only one who let the fans down is Fraud. That's why the audience reacted with an explosion of boos after he was announced the winner. :lol1: You have no idea why fans were booing. My guess, they booed Manny's non effort. Doesn't really matter, the better man won. The only people still complaining are Manny fans that can't or won't admit Manny lost. Go to Vegas and tell the bookies you thought Manny won and see if they pay you.

was there an official documentation of his positive drug test result that he don't want to show Pac's lawyer? probably the same reason they have videos but don't want to release it. LOL No, there was no official documentation about a positive result. Only official documentation that he tested negative.

Bob said a week ago Manny was 100% going into the fight. The workout being short and no hooks is just you fishing. At some point, no matter how much it hurts, its time to accept the fact that Floyd is just superior to Manny inside the ring. I'm sorry Manny let his fans down, but instead of enabling him, why not hold him accountable. The only one who let the fans down is Fraud. That's why the audience reacted with an explosion of boos after he was announced the winner. :lol1:

Having an argument with Rath is like having a conversation with your chimpanzee. You sense there might be hints of human intelligence in him, but what comes out of him is pure gibberish Hints? Surely you jest.

Having an argument with Rath is like having a conversation with a chimpanzee. You sense there might be hints of human intelligence in him, but what comes out of him is pure gibberish

why do you think not having one out of 19 times was not? for the sake of argument, does sechback has editor? I don't because there have been other fights where both were tested and there was no video evidence yet I was sure both got tested. why do you think its suspicious? If Floyd didn't test, what does it mean in your mind?

So how would being a retiree living "a bit comfortably" make you wealthier than someone on here who has a job? For all you know they could make more a year in interest than your entire retirement fund yet still be employed in some capacity. see, now would be the perfect time to demand video evidence, official bank statements w-2's.

So how would being a retiree living "a bit comfortably" make you wealthier than someone on here who has a job? For all you know they could make more a year in interest than your entire retirement fund yet still be employed in some capacity. i never said i am a retiree i never said i am wealthy i just said i don't need job to live because i am settled for life.

being settled for life does not mean i own infinite wealth. it was just i worked so hard and save enough to live a bit comfortably without working So how would being a retiree living "a bit comfortably" make you wealthier than someone on here who has a job? For all you know they could make more a year in interest than your entire retirement fund yet still be employed in some capacity.

Yes, how will I ever recover from one of the most deluded posters on here proclaiming his infinite wealth to an internet forum? Oh the humanity, it burns my soul. being settled for life does not mean i own infinite wealth. it was just i worked so hard and save enough to live a bit comfortably without working

after what i've said, i don't think you could recover from that. Yes, how will I ever recover from one of the most deluded posters on here proclaiming his infinite wealth to an internet forum? Oh the humanity, it burns my soul.

I guess some of you are probably in assisted living of some kind. You're right, it was rude of me not to consider the mentally disabled among us. after what i've said, i don't think you could recover from that. edit: sorry i was mean, it was uncalled for and i am talking all i said to you back.

Manny is better Floyd at this point and I said the opposite before the fightbetter at what boxing? Bwahahahahahahahaha. Gtfoh!!!!