Mayweather's No Win Legacy Dilemma - Catch 22

Slow-mo is too controversial. Watch the fight on pause. With the sound down ... wait, that's not enough -- turn off the screen as well. Then it will be clear to you who really won. exactly!!!

hbo and showtime show the best punch of the round in slow motion. a hbo slow motion highlight never helped me score a damn fight. stop with the bull**** bro. did you go back and watch leonard/hagler in slow motion? how about barrera/morales? or what about pacquiao/marquez 2 or mayweather/de la hoya im sure the answer is no. you know why? BECAUSE NOBODY WATCHES BOXING IN SLOW MO. now all of a sudden watching boxing at real speed, and scoring boxing at real speed makes you a nuthugger. Damn I miss the 90's Yeah, the notion one has to watch a fight in slow motion 2 days later to properly score a fight is retarded.

I guess you are not boxing fan, just a nuthuggeer too. Like I said, both fighters were extremely fast that Slow Motion is needed to actually see what is really happening in the fight. Hell why do HBO and Showtime highlights the best punches of the round in slow mo. To show us if the fighter connects or not and to have a clear view of that particular round (who wins the round). hbo and showtime show the best punch of the round in slow motion. a hbo slow motion highlight never helped me score a damn fight. stop with the bull**** bro. did you go back and watch leonard/hagler in slow motion? how about barrera/morales? or what about pacquiao/marquez 2 or mayweather/de la hoya im sure the answer is no. you know why? BECAUSE NOBODY WATCHES BOXING IN SLOW MO. now all of a sudden watching boxing at real speed, and scoring boxing at real speed makes you a nuthugger. Damn I miss the 90's

Stopped reading at "all of us know"

Salt sammichez anyone??????

Come on guys, it's over no need for rematch. I scored it live, and it was a clear 7-5 to Money. NO it wasnt a schooling from Mayweather, was a very tactical fight, some people find this boring. It is what it is, Maywheather a little better boxer than Pacquiao. Please no more dumb post about it. ahh and I am a Pac supporter and yes I already watch the slow-mo videos. But you know what?, this is like soccer, when something is sanctioned thats it(a Goal for example), you are screwed even if you have a video showing the contrary.

Man, watching the fight in slow motion is torture. Bad enough watching in real time. I understand maybe a point is trying to be made but I will not suffer to see that.

Meanwhile Canelo is the biggest talk in boxing! And Mayweather already undressed him, took his manhood, and made him look like a bum level fighter in front of the world.... Exactly why i don't want Mayweather fighting up and comers, he's ruining them he's from Oscars time frame....The sport can't pass the baton with Floyd there halting the sport going forward in a way...

Slow-mo is too controversial. Watch the fight on pause. With the sound down ... wait, that's not enough -- turn off the screen as well. Then it will be clear to you who really won. you don't even need to watch the fight. just listen to the boos and you know who really won

Slow-mo is too controversial. Watch the fight on pause. With the sound down ... wait, that's not enough -- turn off the screen as well. Then it will be clear to you who really won.

Daaaaayyuuuuum.... eric kelly just bodied TS :lol1::nutkick::sombrero::omfg:

exactly how i saw it as well. floyd never hurt manny, whereas manny rocked him at least 2-3 times. what i found impressive was how many was actually the one going forward, and evading/blocking most of floyd's shots. what floyd did manage to land, was mostly soft jabs. bear in mind, its even more impressive when you realize manny only had 1 arm. floyd just had no answer for the straight left unfortunately. Mayweather hurt him with a low blow :lol1:

As all of us know, Floyd - I like how this idiot starts his post off with "As all of us know..." So you're thinking for other people now? You set your comment up to try and rally up as much people as possible to agree with >YOUR< statement. As if those of us who don't agree with you will stray away from the post because you just rallied up your soldiers by says "as all of us know...". Well, perhaps you meant as all of us IDIOTS know. Fighters have been fighting injured for decades, win lose or draw and you don't hear them using their injury as an excuse to why they lost or why they won, etc. Bottom line is that Floyd beat Pacquiao, simple as that. Floyd's been fighting most of his fights with ****ed up hands, you don't hear him making excuses as to why some fights were close or went the distance. Ward, etc all have fought with injuries and some parts broken. Be a man and stop being a so full of hate and disdain.

my gawd. You guys really had your hearts in this fight. *lives.....

As all of us know, Floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed for the boringness of the so-called "Fight of the Century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a man who medical verification proved was fighting with only one arm. Now, he wants to blame Pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming Pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness. The problem is: The more Mayweather blames shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and making meaningless his so-called "win." Besides accepting a rematch offer from Pacquiao, he can Floyd Mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late? Awwww. Another thread.

:lol1: agenda?!?...you're the one in here defending f*ckery...not me!! LOL. What ****ery I'm defending. I'm very vocal about Arum being a liar. Look at my old post. I know Bob is a liar and you won't see me here defending him for being a liar because he is.

boxing matches are not fought in slow motion, so why the hell would I watch it in slow motion. I have heard it all now. we have too watch fights in slow motion now to determine a winner. I guess you are not boxing fan, just a nuthuggeer too. Like I said, both fighters were extremely fast that Slow Motion is needed to actually see what is really happening in the fight. Hell why do HBO and Showtime highlights the best punches of the round in slow mo. To show us if the fighter connects or not and to have a clear view of that particular round (who wins the round).

I thought Bob Arum is a Liar. Now you believe him when it fits to your agenda. SMH :lol1: agenda?!?...you're the one in here defending f*ckery...not me!!

I have yet too see one scorecard from hbo showtime, the 3 official judges or any media member that had pacquiao winning the fight. when your own network doesn't defend you, that says something. jim lampley is the biggest pacquiao groupie in the world and even he said pacquiao lost Then I guess you need to rewatch the fight in slow mo and score it for yourself and turn off the volume to avoid the biased commentating. Don't be a sheep. Both fighters were actually fast that some of their clean punches we didn't saw live.

This some North Korea type sh*t. Really makes me feel bad for them tbh.