Yes it is the sweet science, but you can still display this science while being a bit more entertaining. Floyd fought a good fight, and I knew he'd win but he did it in a boring fashion. Why not up his punch count a bit? Why not throw combos? Lomachenko is a beautiful display of the sport of boxing, but he at least throws beautiful combos and lots more punches. He moves, he fights defensively and controls range all the while being entertaining. I wish guys like Rigo and Mayweather and Klitschko would use their skills and try to entertain more
I don't even feel like Floyd won, even though he won. Does that make sense??? It was like, OK, you tapped the guy more than he hit you. Good job.
Of course u dont. Of course u doing. All u whiny ass *****es, find a new sport. Seriously. U sound like casuals.
I don't even feel like Floyd won, even though he won. Does that make sense??? It was like, OK, you tapped the guy more than he hit you. Good job.
i agree in a way
The onus was on Pacquiao to throw a million punches and make him him fight. He ends up afraid of being countered and throws less punches than Mayweather.
It was Pacquiao that needed to make changes, not Mayweather. Also, how can you be stupid enough to bring up Lomachenko when he hasn't faced anything like Pacquiao? Mayweather was showing more versatility than the names your bringing up at the same exact age/ against that level of opposition as well.