You gotta be an idiot to believe Khan would duck Bradley. Do people actually believe this fight would have any chance of happening given the still unresolved cold war issues and animosity between Haymon and Arum? If it's that easy, why not expand the possibility with other fighters, not just these two? I'd be glad to see Rios vs Broner, for instance.
I hope he stays true to his word on Bradley, but you're right, I don't expect him to. He'll probably fold like the rest of the Haymon yes-men.
Sadly he is so desperate for the Floyd fight, Haymon is his only chance, so he will just ignore this
Al Haymon has been a disaster for Khan as far as public relations
More like the IBF did contact u
but ur advisor Al Haymon withheld the information
What use is Al if he cant let u know whats on the table?
In the process u are made too look like a div
Khan is the only fighter who says "Fight me b*tch." Followed by "he needs to come to me first doe." Why don't you make an offer Khan, shut the f*ck up already.
I hope he stays true to his word on Bradley, but you're right, I don't expect him to. He'll probably fold like the rest of the Haymon yes-men.
Isn't it clear that he already has?
Even if his team didn't tell him, I don't see him ragging on them
I hope he stays true to his word on Bradley, but you're right, I don't expect him to. He'll probably fold like the rest of the Haymon yes-men.
It's in boxing scene's top headlines that the IBF confirmed he was offered the Bradley fight so somebody is lying. My money is on Khan. What reason would Dan or the IBF have to lie about it?
The other theory is Khan didn't know, so let's see what he says now.
It's in boxing scene's top headlines that the IBF confirmed he was offered the Bradley fight so somebody is lying. My money is on Khan. What reason would Dan or the IBF have to lie about it?
Khan is a proven liar. Damn Khan vs Bradley just like Khan vs Brook would've been a great fight.
Khan robbed us if seeing multiple great welterweight fights in the same month of May.
:ugh1:
Nah. He was about 90% certain it wasn't happening. Because of Floyd he said. Truth is most of his reporting in that negotiation was utter crap.
I remember when he was hearing "strong chatter" that Mayweather was fighting Cotto :lol1:
Nah. He was about 90% certain it wasn't happening. Because of Floyd he said. Truth is most of his reporting in that negotiation was utter crap.
In that Steven A. Smith interview he said that in his opinion the fight wouldn't happen in May, and that if it didn't it was because of Floyd.
That's completely different to this story where he explicitly cites the IBF as the source of the information that Khan had been offered an eliminator. That distinction is important.
So he will fight Bradley in a heartbeat but not Kell Brook. Why?
From what I understand the whole UK want the Brook fight...
the fight isnt as big as its being made out to be, Khan is the draw in this one but he wont be able to sell out Wembley with Brook, not yet anyway. It would be better suited to the O2 or a smaller footy venue.
No he didn't. He said that if it didn't happen it would be because of Floyd.
Nah. He was about 90% certain it wasn't happening. Because of Floyd he said. Truth is most of his reporting in that negotiation was utter crap.
Dan Rafael has no clue
Sure he gets inside info
But whenever he passes judgement , he has no clue
He said within 2 weeks of Floyd PAC being announced that it will not happen and because of Floyd
No he didn't. He said that if it didn't happen it would be because of Floyd.