Comments Thread For: Hearn on Froch's Options: Ward, Chavez, Golovkin, More

Chavez is good money, just not the best money around. But best risk/reward, and Vegas is a big plus, Froch wants that American exposure. Should come out a winner in a crowd pleasing fight. Its all good, I'll watch. It's literally a fact that Chavez is the biggest money fight for Froch. Why do you think Golovkin was so desperate to secure Chavez? I guess there was some other reason for your little butt buddy to want the fight? :lol1: :lol1:@ wants American exposure at 38 years old in potentially his last fight but he doesn't want the most money. You might as well smack yourself in the face repeatedly because that's what you've done metaphorically in this thread.

Why doesn't he just take a UK fight against a low risk fighter? Doesn't have to be Chavez. Are you going to continue to argue that Froch hates money or admit that you're speaking out of your arse again? Cos this is getting tiresome watching you absolutely embarrass yourself in yet another thread Chavez is good money, just not the best money around. But best risk/reward, and Vegas is a big plus, Froch wants that American exposure. Should come out a winner in a crowd pleasing fight. Its all good, I'll watch.

Or he's willing to take a discount for a Vegas fight vs a low risk draw. As far as Chavez' offer, really hard to see it happening, seems something a high Chavez would tweet before consulting his team then keep quiet when called on it, like the 1m bet vs GGG. Why doesn't he just take a UK fight against a low risk fighter? Doesn't have to be Chavez. Are you going to continue to argue that Froch hates money or admit that you're speaking out of your arse again? Cos this is getting tiresome watching you absolutely embarrass yourself in yet another thread

Chavez said in a recent interview he would fight in the UK but Froch wants Vegas. Of course because Froch hates money and wants to fight for less. Or he's willing to take a discount for a Vegas fight vs a low risk draw. As far as Chavez' offer, really hard to see it happening, seems something a high Chavez would tweet before consulting his team then keep quiet when called on it, like the 1m bet vs GGG.

Chavez is not fighting Froch in the UK lol. There you go again with your poor knowledge of boxing. Nor does Chavez bring anything extra in the UK vs GGG for example, just a much steeper price tag. Chavez said in a recent interview he would fight in the UK but Froch wants Vegas. Of course because Froch hates money and wants to fight for less.

Why doesn't Froch just fight Chavez in the UK then? Or fight anyone in the UK. Why is he so amendment on Vegas? Oh yeah cos he wants to lose money, I forgot :lol1: Chavez is not fighting Froch in the UK lol. There you go again with your poor knowledge of boxing. Nor does Chavez bring anything extra in the UK vs GGG for example, just a much steeper price tag.

Don't get so butthurt buddy. It all depends, what they're making at home, what's there for them in the US. Froch is doing great domestically, with only 1 ppv option stateside: buma$$ Chavez, unreliable mid size draw. If you're a welter there's more and much better options Why doesn't Froch just fight Chavez in the UK then? Or fight anyone in the UK. Why is he so amendment on Vegas? Oh yeah cos he wants to lose money, I forgot :lol1:

So all these UK fighters are losing money by going to America. Terrific argument genius. Don't get so butthurt buddy. It all depends, what they're making at home, what's there for them in the US. Froch is doing great domestically, with only 1 ppv option stateside: buma$$ Chavez, unreliable mid size draw. If you're a welter there's more and much better options

Lewis never really was a UK fighter, sold ppvs etc. Khan went to the Us to rebuild. Whole different stage of career, ditto Hatton. Froch took a while to get that big, Vegas is his victory lap. Which is fine, he's earned it and should be a good fight. Hope he beats down Chavez and he should. Degale might even net him more money, but its more risk for less exposure. GGG would get him more exposure but unacceptably high risk I suppose, despite many advantages on paper So all these UK fighters are losing money by going to America. Terrific argument genius.

Was Floyd the only guy Hatton fought in Vegas? What about Khan? Lennox Lewis? Why are all these UK fighters going to Vegas when it badly affects the "UK sales doe"? Lewis never really was a UK fighter, sold ppvs etc. Khan went to the Us to rebuild. Whole different stage of career, ditto Hatton. Froch took a while to get that big, Vegas is his victory lap. Which is fine, he's earned it and should be a good fight. Hope he beats down Chavez and he should. Degale might even net him more money, but its more risk for less exposure. GGG would get him more exposure but unacceptably high risk I suppose, despite many advantages on paper

Hate to break it to you, but Chavez is not Floyd lol. But I get the appeal of a Vegas fight for Froch, its legit. I don't think its a better move financially or in terms of legacy or current standing in boxing. Its much better on risk/reward sure. But if hes not passing Froch risk/reward filter, how the hell does he get fights vs the name guys, who are smaller, weaker or just plain worse like Chavez? Was Floyd the only guy Hatton fought in Vegas? What about Khan? Lennox Lewis? Why are all these UK fighters going to Vegas when it badly affects the "UK sales doe"?

It makes you wonder why Ricky Hatton ever came to Vegas. I mean, he sold up to 50k tickets at home against opponents who came cheap and were on prime time UK PPV. Why did he lose all that money by going to Vegas and fighting at 5 in the morning as the b-side? :lol1: Hate to break it to you, but Chavez is not Floyd lol. But I get the appeal of a Vegas fight for Froch, its legit. I don't think its a better move financially or in terms of legacy or current standing in boxing. Its much better on risk/reward sure. But if hes not passing Froch risk/reward filter, how the hell does he get fights vs the name guys, who are smaller, weaker or just plain worse like Chavez?

Top reply. That's not why Froch won't face him, its the risk duh. Those are some of the reasons for, comes cheap, but lots of exposure and p4p points, nevermind for someone smaller and unproven It makes you wonder why Ricky Hatton ever came to Vegas. I mean, he sold up to 50k tickets at home against opponents who came cheap and were on prime time UK PPV. Why did he lose all that money by going to Vegas and fighting at 5 in the morning as the b-side? :lol1:

"Froch won't face Golovkin because he wants less money for the fight and he wants to give up home advanatage" - HeroBando :lol1: Wow....Froch really is sick and crazy Top reply. That's not why Froch won't face him, its the risk duh. Those are some of the reasons for, comes cheap, but lots of exposure and p4p points, nevermind for someone smaller and unproven

They demand it cause its an out. Listen Im not saying GGG is the biggest money out there for Froch. Its up there, and IMO it does make him more than the much less risky Chavez. But no doubt GGG carries a ton of momentum and p4p points way beyond Chavez. Unlike Jr, smaller guy coming up in weight, gives up homecourt advantage. What's not to like, other than your chances? "Froch won't face Golovkin because he wants less money for the fight and he wants to give up home advanatage" - HeroBando :lol1: Wow....Froch really is sick and crazy

So why do Froch and Hearn demand that the Golovkin fight be a duel PPV? You're literally saying that Froch and Hearn want to take less money to fight Golovkin. Absolutely owning and making a right tit out of yourself again. Dear oh dear. :lol1: They demand it cause its an out. Listen Im not saying GGG is the biggest money out there for Froch. Its up there, and IMO it does make him more than the much less risky Chavez. But no doubt GGG carries a ton of momentum and p4p points way beyond Chavez. Unlike Jr, smaller guy coming up in weight, gives up homecourt advantage. What's not to like, other than your chances?

No sh1t Sherlock, of course Froch GGG is a bigger fight in the UK than here. And it would do far better on Uk ppv than Chavez vs B side Froch at 5am. Hence lost UK sales, slow fcuk So why do Froch and Hearn demand that the Golovkin fight be a duel PPV? You're literally saying that Froch and Hearn want to take less money to fight Golovkin. Absolutely owning and making a right tit out of yourself again. Dear oh dear. :lol1:

Well no because the people who are actually behind making these fights are aware of this. You, a rabid and desperate Golovkin fantard is not and refuses to accept reality. Neither Chavez or Golovkin are big names in the UK so the "lost UK sales" isn't as large as you're desperately trying to make out and it becomes even more negligible given the fact that the price of Sky PPV is far less. Just for the kicker, if what you're saying is true, wouldn't that make Froch-Golovkin a bigger money fight in the UK than in the US? So are you saying that Hearn/Froch want to take less money to fight Golovkin since their demand is for a duel PPV Vegas fight? "Lost UK sales doe" :lol1: What a fuking idiot. No sh1t Sherlock, of course Froch GGG is a bigger fight in the UK than here. And it would do far better on Uk ppv than Chavez vs B side Froch at 5am. Hence lost UK sales, slow fcuk

Notice how they avoid mentioning the man they robbed, how they stole his 0 away to not reward him, the deserved wbc super middleweight belt. Froch has always been scared to say Andre Dirrell's name.

There's no way to tell who's right here. Hard to tell whether the Us ppv would offset the lost UK sales, given that ppv numbers have been dropping here, and most importantly, the far lower percentage Froch would be taking in the Us. Well no because the people who are actually behind making these fights are aware of this. You, a rabid and desperate Golovkin fantard is not and refuses to accept reality. Neither Chavez or Golovkin are big names in the UK so the "lost UK sales" isn't as large as you're desperately trying to make out and it becomes even more negligible given the fact that the price of Sky PPV is far less. Just for the kicker, if what you're saying is true, wouldn't that make Froch-Golovkin a bigger money fight in the UK than in the US? So are you saying that Hearn/Froch want to take less money to fight Golovkin since their demand is for a duel PPV Vegas fight? "Lost UK sales doe" :lol1: What a fuking idiot.