Been reading that Tyson thinks Pac's style could give Floyd's some serious problems.
Just read that Ali thinks Floyd has too much skill for Pacquiao.
Basically, Tyson leans towards Pacquiao and Ali leans towards Floyd. Who is the more reliable source? Ali or Tyson?
Correction. Who is the more "objective" analyst?
There's the fantasy match in people's minds of Tyson vs Ali.. but as far as being a more objective, and yes, also a more "reliable" source, between the two, whose knowledge would you trust more? Ali or Tyson's?
Well both are subjective opinions made by each person.
What are you trying to get at?
That might be the most diplomatic answer in the history of this whole thread.
Lol that sounded funny... Seeing as how this thread had like 4 minutes of "history"
In the end, it will be pacs willingness to smoother floyd completely vs floyds great defense...
Like the guy said, they both can be right...
I just don't want to see pac try and "box" with floyd...
What does it have to do with reliability?
Correction. Who is the more "objective" analyst?
There's the fantasy match in people's minds of Tyson vs Ali.. but as far as being a more objective, and yes, also a more "reliable" source, between the two, whose knowledge would you trust more? Ali or Tyson's?
both statements can be true the same time.
pac can give floyd problems but floyd has better skill. I chose Ali and Tyson.
That might be the most diplomatic answer in the history of this whole thread.