EDIT: BIGJAVI973 TRIED TO REDIT COTTO'S PAGE AND HAS NOW RUINED IT ENTIRELY. EVERYONE THANK BIGJAVI973
Well, just his win over Martinez which did not mention ANYTHING about Martinez' knee and how it hindered his performance. Had I not edited you would think the knee was of no circumstance. That's dishonest and not fair. It's funny though, had Cotto suffered a cut or something it would have totally been in the description of the fight. Martinez DRAGGING his knee through the ring wasn't worthy enough to be mentioned though. Disgust at whichever of you stans wrote that.
Anyways, I also added a small segment on the Canelo negotiations. Kept it 100% too. If you feel a fighter's history and/or record is dishonest head to that wiki page and do something about it brah! :boxing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Cotto#Middleweight
Mentioned that it was speculation so nothing wrong with what is written, it adds interest to the article without stating it as fact.
I would move it to the end though.
He then stated it was a fact.....
Mentioned that it was speculation so nothing wrong with what is written, it adds interest to the article without stating it as fact.
I would move it to the end though.
No, just the ones who look to discredit somebody by typing in nonsense. Look at any fight in history and you can come up with an excuse as to why the loser lost and take credit away from the winner. Plus look at your sig, guys like you who spend their days insulting or trying to discredit a guy because you're not a fan come off as childish to me, just my opinion though.
Martinez won a fight in his country on messed up legs. He managed to keep Murray off of him, although he was dropped. People stated that version of Martinez would still destroy Cotto. He got caught cold early and was damaged live with it people. He didnt even make excuses. Was he 100% no. But he still had movement. Haters Haters...
EDIT: BIGJAVI973 TRIED TO REDIT COTTO'S PAGE AND HAS NOW RUINED IT ENTIRELY. EVERYONE THANK BIGJAVI973
Well, just his win over Martinez which did not mention ANYTHING about Martinez' knee and how it hindered his performance. Had I not edited you would think the knee was of no circumstance. That's dishonest and not fair. It's funny though, had Cotto suffered a cut or something it would have totally been in the description of the fight. Martinez DRAGGING his knee through the ring wasn't worthy enough to be mentioned though. Disgust at whichever of you stans wrote that.
Anyways, I also added a small segment on the Canelo negotiations. Kept it 100% too. If you feel a fighter's history and/or record is dishonest head to that wiki page and do something about it brah! :boxing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Cotto#Middleweight
What a f*cking butt hurt douche. GTFO!!! Martinez had no excuses and made non after the fight. He even got checked the next day and his doctor said he was fine. That was reported by his camp. Martinez himself said he was affected by the hook and never recovered. What you never saw that happen in boxing.
Didn't the post fight mri say his knee was fine? I am pretty sure that was said in an article they released. I mean he def didn't have a good training camp, that could be why he performed liked crap. but Cotto was on point that night. Very disciplined and with a great game plan. And Martinez said that the first big hook Cotto landed messed him up for the rest of the night. And those are Facts as well.
Hey Threadstarter, while you are at it, update Morales, Salido, and Vargas wiki, to factor in that good tainted beef/roids info. Don't forget to mention Abner Mares 50 low blows, and how the referee Richard Steele, beat Meldrick Taylor with seconds to go. Oh, and please update Marquez's chest acne KO over Manny at age 38.
Thanks bro! :boxing:
Yeap, keep it consistent OP! LMAO
should also be noted in the wikipedia page...
"trolls and haters from nsb (boxingscene.com sub forum) also picked maravilla martinez to whip cotto even with a bum knee. After winning they changed their tune and downgraded martinez to a cripple hence giving cotto absolutely no credit for demolishing the lineal middleweight champion."
this this this this this this
110% true
Wait, so you're saying only facts go on there. So why doesn't it say anything about Cotto snogging dudes? he does it all the time. In front of like tens of thousands of people. ATG face chewer.
How is my input nonsense? It's FACT.
In any case, isn't this also discrediting then?:
From the Cotto-Margarito I segment on wikipedia: "Cotto's loss to Margarito has since come under suspicion due to Margarito's subsequent attempted use of illegal hand-wraps in a fight against Shane Mosley."
Be consistent bro. And yeah, it's pretty obvious I dislike Cotto's huggers. Doesn't mean I'm not stating facts though. Two separate things entirely.
You have to much time on your hands dude. Your facts are based on your opinion.....which means it's not a fact.
it's a fact that people think sergio's knee was bad and he had an op on it. It's also a fact he himself said his knee was fine, mri was clean, he darted across the ring when cotto thought the round was over.
looking at that most things point to it coming down to cottos performance and that first hook that landed cleanly.
if your going to edit something on a major website you should include all the factors....unless of course you want to be a hater.....which you clearly are otherwise there would be no point in coming here to brag about it!
It should also be added Margarito is selling meat out of a truck in Tijuana with a bum eye paying child support to his hooker ex wife
Pass the Churrasco!
http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rejoice.png
http://tinyurl.com/2exj4p9
Lmao dude.....!!!!!!
OP: should add more to the margarito beating on wikipedia. It's vague on the details. Add the part about Cotto having blood come from his eyes, his wife and children crying (add this gif if you can http://i35.tinypic.com/25fkpdy.gif), and how he earned the reputation as "kneeguel" after that fight.
Also, add how after the second margarito fight, cotto admitted margarito's punches felt the same as the first fight, implying margarito did not cheat in the first fight.
Lastly, you should add that Margarito is legally Cotto's father.
It should also be added Margarito is selling meat out of a truck in Tijuana with a bum eye paying child support to his hooker ex wife
Pass the Churrasco!
http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rejoice.png
no it is not. YOU were the one that said I got on twitter and youtube and look for my name blah blah blah... I defend cotto on cotto threads when I see canela fans like you being butt hurt all the time... while being happy canela is fighting almost 2 year inactive kirkland and ducked clottey.
How can "Canela" fans be butt hurt yet happy at the same time? There would be no reason to be butt hurt about the fight not falling through if you're content about the end result, Kirkland fight.