Which possible* fight is better: Mayweather vs Pacquiao or W. Klitschko vs Briggs?

You're glob damn right I voted for Klitschko/Briggs. Let's Go Champ!

Wow ATG & Champion in waiting Briggs vs Klutchko wins over the two paper champs Mayfeather & Patmeow. Finally NSB sees sense for once in a millenia.

Any fight involving two good fighters against each other is 100 times better than a great champion Wlad wasting his time fighting a classless stupid washed up Briggs who hasn't had a good win in years. Canelo-Kirkland, Matthysse- Rusland, Matthysse-Garcia, Rigo-Santa Cruz, GGG-Cotto Maidana-Thurman Brook-Khan Kovalev-Pascal, Kovalev-Stevenson, Bradley-Khan, Bradley-Brook, Bradley-Thurman,Brook-Thurman and a few hundred other fights would be better and more meaningful fights than Wlad vs. Briggs. But if Wlad-Briggs is the fight you want then enjoy it because it will happen. The only attention that will come from the fierce beating Wlad will give to Briggs is negative attention. It's the attraction though. More people have watched Briggs vs Wlad videos than the amount of people willing to watch, let's say Rigondeaux vs Lomachenko. All the fights you named are better, 100%. But it's what gets fans attention. Shannon Briggs YT videos bothering Wlad have well over 3 million views combined, a quick count shows Wlad/Briggs videos have a combined 3.6 million views on YT.

The Wlad-Briggs Youtube videos have gained a lot of attention. With Wilder vs Stiverne coming out with the preferred winner and Briggs antics on Wlad, HW division is getting some much needed attention. I think Wlad-Briggs rivals Mayweather-Pacquiao as far as attention goes. If you disagree, name the next fight on the horizon after Mayweather vs Pacquiao, that brings worldwide attention to the sport? Canelo-Cotto is off so we cannot mention that.Any fight involving two good fighters against each other is 100 times better than a great champion Wlad wasting his time fighting a classless stupid washed up Briggs who hasn't had a good win in years. Canelo-Kirkland, Matthysse- Rusland, Matthysse-Garcia, Rigo-Santa Cruz, GGG-Cotto Maidana-Thurman Brook-Khan Kovalev-Pascal, Kovalev-Stevenson, Bradley-Khan, Bradley-Brook, Bradley-Thurman,Brook-Thurman and a few hundred other fights would be better and more meaningful fights than Wlad vs. Briggs. But if Wlad-Briggs is the fight you want then enjoy it because it will happen. The only attention that will come from the fierce beating Wlad will give to Briggs is negative attention.

Who looks more past prime, Pacquaio or Briggs?

:lol1: Da Fuck!?!?!? Dumb thread to be honest. Your not wrong there , and look at the clowns that voted for Klit Briggs , there is some serious empty heads on this site .

Reported for post unrelated to thread topic :lol1: What the hell is with you and reporting everyone? Is this some sort of running joke?

If you really did report me, we are no longer e-friends. If you are kidding, you may continue to post in my thread. Reporting for complaining about report for post unrelated to thread topic.

Reported for post unrelated to thread topic If you really did report me, we are no longer e-friends. If you are kidding, you may continue to post in my thread.

Can anyone refute that Wladimir Klitschko vs Shannon Briggs is the second most popular fight that has been verbally agreed upon this year? Like I said, Canelo-Cotto is a fantasy fight so we cannot talk about that right now. If Khan fights Brook, that fight would be huge, Canelo-Cotto even bigger, but neither Khan or Cotto are trying to make that fight so we are stuck with Mayweather-Pacquiao, Wladimir-Briggs, Wilder-Fury(maybe).

Are you the bizzaro version of me? You're name is mine backwards. Reported for post unrelated to thread topic

Is this a joke Kev? Mayweather-Pacquiao is by far the biggest fight in boxing. It's the fight most fans would love to see. Briggs is a washed up fighter who Vitali already slaughtered years ago. Briggs does not deserve a fight with Wlad. Briggs wouldn't stand a chance in hell of beating Wlad. Only a fan who wanted to see a total mismatch and Briggs get another vicious beating would want this fight. Briggs would never land a punch but Briggs showed in his fight with Vitali that he can take a terrible beating and stay standing. The Wlad-Briggs Youtube videos have gained a lot of attention. With Wilder vs Stiverne coming out with the preferred winner and Briggs antics on Wlad, HW division is getting some much needed attention. I think Wlad-Briggs rivals Mayweather-Pacquiao as far as attention goes. If you disagree, name the next fight on the horizon after Mayweather vs Pacquiao, that brings worldwide attention to the sport? Canelo-Cotto is off so we cannot mention that.

LETS GO CHAMP. ok im sure all teh votes for briggs vs klinchko are voted with the same intent as me.... to skew the truth and troll :dance::dance: Are you the bizzaro version of me? You're name is mine backwards.

LETS GO CHAMP. ok im sure all teh votes for briggs vs klinchko are voted with the same intent as me.... to skew the truth and troll :dance::dance:

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3H4PwROpxS0/hqdefault.jpg :sucks:

reported for troll thread

Salmon steak and coconut water!!! LETS GO CHAMP

Is this a joke Kev? Mayweather-Pacquiao is by far the biggest fight in boxing. It's the fight most fans would love to see. Briggs is a washed up fighter who Vitali already slaughtered years ago. Briggs does not deserve a fight with Wlad. Briggs wouldn't stand a chance in hell of beating Wlad. Only a fan who wanted to see a total mismatch and Briggs get another vicious beating would want this fight. Briggs would never land a punch but Briggs showed in his fight with Vitali that he can take a terrible beating and stay standing.

The Ring/WBC/WBA Welterweight champion Floyd Mayweather Jr, can possibly defend his title vs the #1 ranked Welterweight Manny Pacquiao, who holds the WBO Welterweight title. The Ring/IBF/WBA/WBO Heavyweight champion is lined up to fight non top 10 ranked, 43 year old Shannon Briggs.

:lol1: Da Fuck!?!?!? Dumb thread to be honest. :lol1: Doesn't it remind you of something?